CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 71

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Characterizing natural riparian vegetation for modeling of flow and suspended sediment transport

Västilä, Kaisa, Järvelä, Juha·2018·Journal of Soils and Sediments
DOI 10.1007/s11368-017-1776-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11368-017-1776-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. Aberle J, Järvelä J (2013) Flow resistance of emergent rigid and flexible vegetation. J Hydraul Res 51(1):33–45 · DOI
  2. Aberle J, Järvelä J (2015) Hydrodynamics of vegetated channels. In: Rowinski P, Radecki-Pawlik A (eds) Rivers—physical, fluvial and environmental processes. GeoPlanet: earth and planetary sciences. Springer, Berlin, pp 519–541 · DOI
  3. Arboleda AM, Crosato A, Middelkoop H (2010) Reconstructing the early 19th century Waal River by means of a 2D physics-based numerical model. Hydrol Process 24(25):3661–3675 · DOI
  4. Ayotte KW, Finnigan JJ, Raupach MR (1999) A second-order closure for neutrally stratified vegetative canopy flows. Bound-Layer Meteorol 90:189–216 · DOI
  5. Belcher SE, Harman IN, Finnigan JJ (2012) The wind in the willows: flows in forest canopies in complex terrain. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 44:479–504 · DOI
  6. Boothroyd RJ, Hardy RJ, Warburton J, Marjoribanks TI (2015) The importance of accurately representing submerged vegetation morphology in the numerical prediction of complex river flow. Earth Surf Process Landforms 41(4):567–576 · DOI
  7. Bos AR, Bouma TJ, de Kort GLJ, van Katwijk MM (2007) Ecosystem engineering by annual intertidal seagrass beds: sediment accretion and modification. Estuar Coast Shelf S 74:344–348 · DOI
  8. Branß T, Dittrich A, Núñez-González F (2016) Reproducing natural levee formation in an experimental flume. In: Constantinescu G, Garcia M, Hanes D (eds) River flow 2016. CRC Press, London, pp 1122–1128 · DOI
  9. Corenblit D, Steiger J, Gurnell AM, Tabacchi E, Roques L (2009) Control of sediment dynamics by vegetation as a key function driving biogeomorphic succession within fluvial corridors. Earth Surf Process Landforms 34(13):1790–1810 · DOI
  10. Di Stefano C, Ferro V, Mirabile S (2010) Comparison between grain-size analyses using laser diffraction and sedimentation methods. Biosyst Eng 106:105–115 · DOI
  11. Dittrich A, Aberle J, Schoneboom T (2012) Drag forces and flow resistance of flexible riparian vegetation. In: Rodi W, Uhlmann M (eds) Environmental fluid mechanics: memorial volume in honour of prof. Gerhard H. Jirka, IAHR monographs. CRC Press, London, pp 195–215
  12. Droppo I (2001) Rethinking what constitutes suspended sediment. Hydrol Process 15:1551–1564 · DOI
  13. Fleischer P, Soyeaux R (2013) Technical-biological bank protection on waterways with high traffic frequency—first experience gained from a test stretch at the River Rhine with regard to bank stability. In: Rigo P, Wolters M (eds) Proceedings, 6th International PIANC-Smart Rivers Conference, 23–27 September 2013, Liège, Belgium/Maastricht, the Netherlands, 10 pp
  14. Ganthy F, Soissons L, Sauria PG, Verney R, Sottolichio A (2015) Effects of short flexible seagrass Zostera noltei on flow, erosion and deposition processes determined using flume experiments. Sedimentology 62:997–1023 · DOI
  15. Geerling GW, Kater E, van den Brink C, Baptist MJ, Ragas AMJ, Smits AJM (2008) Nature rehabilitation by floodplain excavation: the hydraulic effect of 16 years of sedimentation and vegetation succession along the Waal River, NL. Geomorphology 99(1–4):317–328 · DOI
  16. Gurnell A (2014) Plants as river system engineers. Earth Surf Process Landforms 39:4–25 · DOI
  17. Jalonen J, Järvelä J (2014) Estimation of drag forces caused by natural woody vegetation of different scales. J Hydrodyn 26:608–623 · DOI
  18. Jalonen J, Järvelä J, Aberle J (2013) Leaf area index as vegetation density measure for hydraulic analyses. J Hydraul Eng 139(5):461–469 · DOI
  19. Jalonen J, Järvelä J, Virtanen J-P, Vaaja M, Kurkela M, Hyyppä H (2015) Determining characteristic vegetation areas by terrestrial laser scanning for floodplain flow modeling. Water 7(2):420–437 · DOI
  20. Järvelä J (2004) Determination of flow resistance caused by non-submerged woody vegetation. Int J River Basin Manag 2(1):61–70 · DOI
  21. Jeffries R, Darby SE, Sear DA (2003) The influence of vegetation and organic debris on flood plain sediment dynamics: case study of a loworder stream in the New Forest, England. Geomorphology 51:61–80 · DOI
  22. Kang H, Choi S-U (2006) Turbulence modeling of compound open-channel flows with and without vegetation on the floodplain using the Reynolds stress model. Adv Water Res 29:1650–1664 · DOI
  23. Kasvi E, Alho P, Lotsari E, Wang Y, Kukko A, Hyyppä H, Hyyppä J (2015) Two-dimensional and three-dimensional computational models in hydrodynamic and morphodynamic reconstructions of a river bend: sensitivity and functionality. Hydrol Process 29:1604–1629 · DOI
  24. Konings AG, Katul GG, Thompson SE (2012) A phenomenological model for the flow resistance over submerged vegetation. Water Resour Res 48:W02522. doi: 10.1029/2011WR011000 · DOI
  25. Kouwen N, Fathi-Moghadam M (2000) Friction factors for coniferous trees along rivers. J Hydraul Eng 126:732–740 · DOI
  26. de Langre E (2008) Effects of wind on plants. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 40:141–168 · DOI
  27. Li M-H, Eddleman KE (2002) Biotechnical engineering as an alternative to traditional engineering methods: a biotechnical streambank stabilization design approach. Landscape Urban Plan 60:225–242 · DOI
  28. Li X, Zhang L, Zhang Z (2006) Soil bioengineering and the ecological restoration of riverbanks at the airport town, Shanghai, China. Ecol Eng 26:304–314 · DOI
  29. López F, García M (1998) Open-channel flow through simulated vegetation: suspended sediment transport modeling. Water Resour Res 34(9):2341–2352 · DOI
  30. Luhar M, Nepf H (2013) From the blade scale to the reach scale: a characterization of aquatic vegetative drag. Adv Water Resour 51:305–316 · DOI
  31. Luhar M, Rominger J, Nepf H (2008) Interaction between flow, transport and vegetation spatial structure. Environ Fluid Mech 8:423–439 · DOI
  32. Ma L, Zheng G, Eitel JUH, Magney TS, Moskal LM (2016) Determining woody-to-total area ratio using terrestrial laser scanning (TLS). Agric For Meteorol 228–229:217–228 · DOI
  33. Mahl UH, Tank JL, Roley SS, Davis RT (2015) Two-stage ditch floodplains enhance N-removal capacity and reduce turbidity and dissolved P in agricultural streams. JAWRA 51(4):923–940
  34. Manners R, Wilcox AC, Kui L, Lightbody A, Stella J, Sklar L (2015) When do plants modify fluvial processes? Plant-hydraulic interactions under variable flow and sediment supply rates. Water Resour Res 120(2):325–345
  35. McGahey C, Samuels PG, Knight DW, O’Hare MT (2008) Estimating river flow capacity in practice. J Flood Risk Manage 1(1):23–33 · DOI
  36. Middelkoop H, Asselman NEM (1998) Spatial variability of floodplain sedimentation at the event scale in the Rhine-Meuse Delta, the Netherlands. Earth Surf Process Landforms 23:561–573 · DOI
  37. Naiman RJ, Décamps H (1997) The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:621–658 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Nepf H (2012) Flow and transport in regions with aquatic vegetation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 44:123–142 · DOI
  39. Niklas KJ (1997) Size- and age-dependent variation in the properties of sap- and heartwood in black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) Annal Bot 79:473–478
  40. O’Hare M (2015) Aquatic vegetation—a primer for hydrodynamic specialists. J Hydraul Res 53(6):687–698 · DOI
  41. Osterkamp WR, Hupp CR, Stoffel M (2012) The interactions between vegetation and erosion: new directions for research at the interface of ecology and geomorphology. Earth Surf Process Landforms 37:23–36 · DOI
  42. Owens PN, Batalla RJ, Collins AJ, Gomez B, Hicks DM, Horowitz AJ, Kondolf GM, Marden M, Page MJ, Peacock DH, Petticrew EL, Salomons W, Trustrum NA (2005) Fine-grained sediment in river systems: environmental significance and management issues. River Res Applic 21:693–717 · DOI
  43. Pasquale N, Perona P, Francis R, Burlando P (2014) Above-ground and be-low-ground Salix dynamics in response to river processes. Hydrol Process 28:5189–5203 · DOI
  44. Peltola HM (2006) Mechanical stability of trees under static loads. Am J Bot 93(10):1501–1511 · DOI
  45. Peralta G, van Duren LA, Morris EP, Bouma TJ (2008) Consequences of shoot density and stiffness for ecosystem engineering by benthic macrophytes in flow dominated areas: a hydrodynamic flume study. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 368:103–115 · DOI
  46. Schuurman F, Marra WA, Kleinhans MG (2013) Physics-based modeling of large braided sand-bed rivers: bar pattern formation, dynamics, and sensitivity. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 118:2509–2527 · DOI
  47. Sellin RHJ, van Beesten DP (2004) Conveyance of a managed vegetated two-stage river channel. Water Management 157(1):21–33
  48. Sharpe RG, James CS (2006) Deposition of sediment from suspension in emergent vegetation. Water SA 32(2):211–218
  49. Shields FD Jr, Coulton KG, Nepf H (2017) Representation of vegetation in two-dimensional hydrodynamic models. J Hydraul Eng 02517002. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001320 · DOI
  50. Shiono K, Muto Y (1998) Complex flow mechanisms in compound meandering channels with overbank flow. J Fluid Mech 376:221–261 · DOI
  51. Solari L, van Oorschot M, Belletti B, Hendriks D, Rinaldi M, Vargas-Luna A (2016) Advances on modeling riparian vegetation–hydromorphology interactions. River Res Applic 32:164–178 · DOI
  52. Sukhodolov AN, Sukhodolova TA (2012) Vegetated mixing layer around a finite-size patch of submerged plants: part 2. Turbulence statistics and structures. Water Resour Res 48:W12506. doi: 10.1029/2011WR011805 · DOI
  53. Thonon I, Roberti JR, Middelkoop H, van der Perk M, Burrough PA (2005) In situ measurements of sediment settling characteristics in floodplains using a LISST-ST. Earth Surf Process Landforms 30:1327–1343 · DOI
  54. Thornton CI, Abt SR, Clary WP (1997) Vegetation influence on small stream siltation. J Am Water Resour As 33(6):1279–1288 · DOI
  55. Uusitalo R, Yli-Halla M, Turtola E (2000) Suspended soil as a source of potentially bioavailable phosphorus in surface runoff waters from clay soils. Water Res 34(9):2477–2482 · DOI
  56. Vargas-Luna A, Crosato A, Calvani G, Uijttewaal WSJ (2015a) Representing plants as rigid cylinders in experiments and models. Adv Water Resourc 93(B):205–222
  57. Vargas-Luna A, Crosato A, Uijttewaal WSJ (2015b) Effects of vegetation on flow and sediment transport: comparative analyses and validation of predicting models. Earth Surf Process Landforms 40:157–176 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Västilä K (2015) Flow–plant–sediment interactions: vegetative resistance modeling and cohesive sediment processes. Doctoral thesis, Aalto University School of Engineering, Espoo, Finland. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-60-6597-7
  59. Västilä K, Järvelä J (2011) Environmentally preferable two-stage drainage channels: considerations for cohesive sediments and conveyance. Int J River Basin Manage 9(3–4):171–180 · DOI
  60. Västilä K, Järvelä J (2014) Modeling the flow resistance of woody vegetation using physically-based properties of the foliage and stem. Water Resour Res 50(1):229–245 · DOI
  61. Västilä K, Järvelä J, Jalonen J (2015) Effect of floodplain vegetation on flow and transport of cohesive particles in an environmental two-stage channel. In: Proceedings, 36th IAHR World Congress, 28.6.–3.7.2015, Delft – The Hague, the Netherlands
  62. Västilä K, Järvelä J, Koivusalo H (2016) Flow–vegetation–sediment interaction in a cohesive compound channel. J Hydraul Eng 142(1):04015034. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001058 · DOI
  63. Vogel S (1994) Life in moving fluids—the physical biology of flow, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton
  64. Whittaker P, Wilson C, Aberle J (2015) An improved Cauchy number approach for predicting the drag and reconfiguration of flexible vegetation. Adv Water Res 83:28–35 · DOI
  65. Wood PJ, Armitage PD (1997) Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment. Environ Manag 21(2):203–217 · DOI
  66. Xavier P (2009) Floodplain woodland hydrodynamics. Doctoral thesis, Cardiff School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
  67. Zinke P (2011) Modelling of flow and levee depositions in a freshwater delta with natural vegetation. Doctoral thesis. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
  68. Zinke P, Olsen NRB, Bogen J (2011) Three-dimensional numerical modelling of levee depositions in a Scandinavian freshwater delta. Geomorphology 129:320–333 · DOI
  69. Zong L, Nepf H (2011) Spatial distribution of deposition within a patch of vegetation. Water Resour Res 47:W03516. doi: 10.1029/2010WR009516 · DOI
  70. Zou J, Yan G, Zhu L, Zhang W (2009) Woody-to-total area ratio determination with a multispectral canopy imager. Tree Physiol 29:1069–1080 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Västilä, K., & Järvelä, J.
Venue
Journal of Soils and Sediments
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-07-18
Volume
18
Issue
10
Pages
3114-3130
ISSN
  • 1439-0108
  • 1614-7480
DOI
10.1007/s11368-017-1776-3
Cited by
71
References
0
Language
en
Update notices
correction (2017-11-04)
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Funders
Maa- ja vesitekniikan tuki ry (700693)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review