Designing Motion Gesture Interfaces in Mobile Phones for Blind People
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent studies designed gesture-based commands and tangible bendable gestures for blind users.
“Recent studies have designed and developed a gesture-based set of commands [90] and tangible bendable gestures for blind users [91].”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [90]
Audio augmentation techniques can be interfered with by background noise.
“However, audio augmentation techniques can be interfered with by background noise [90], and the performance of audio augmentation techniques is also influenced by algorithm recognition accuracy.”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [90]
A common practice is to use audio augmentation techniques such as voice-over and speech recognition.
“A common practice is to use audio augmentation techniques, such as voice-over (a.k.a.screen reader) and speech recognition [90,91].”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [90]
Cites
Kane, S. K., Jayant, C., Wobbrock, J. O., & Ladner, R. E. (2009) · Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility · doi:10.1145/1639642.1639663 · Cited by 383 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Keywords design, motion gesture, user-defined study”
Kane, S. K., Bigham, J. P., & Wobbrock, J. O. (2008) · Proceedings of the 10th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/1414471.1414487 · Cited by 374 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This study was thus motivated to elicit the most preferable and ergonomic gestures for such interactions.”
BackgroundUsable gestures for blind people: understanding preference and performance
Kane, S. K., Wobbrock, J. O., & Ladner, R. E. (2011) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1978942.1979001 · Cited by 314 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This study was thus motivated to elicit the most preferable and ergonomic gestures for such interactions.”
BackgroundAdaptive blind interaction technique for touchscreens
Yfantidis, G., & Evreinov, G. (2006) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-004-0109-7 · Cited by 73 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Audio-based text entry systems were also developed by Sánchez and Aguayo([28]) and Yfantidis and Evreinov([29]).”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review
Punchoojit, L., & Hongwarittorrn, N. (2017) · Advances in Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1155/2017/6787504 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Mobile device accessibility for the visually impaired: problems mapping and recommendations
Damaceno, R. J. P., Braga, J. C., & Mena-Chalco, J. P. (2018) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-017-0540-1 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Huang, H. (2018) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-017-0550-z · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dim, N. K., & Ren, X.
- Affiliations
- Kochi University of Technology (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Ren, Xiangshi
- ORCID
- Ren, Xiangshi
- Venue
- Journal of Computer Science and Technology
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 812-824
- ISSN
- 1000-9000 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-4749
- OpenAlex
- W2017628824
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Computer Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25330241)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- blind users, smartphone accessibility, speech feedback, vibration feedback, usability, user experience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
