Cited by 384Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityUsability and User Interface Design

Freedom to roam: a study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities

Kane, Shaun K., Jayant, Chandrika, Wobbrock, Jacob O., Ladner, Richard E.·2009·Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility

Abstract

Mobile devices provide people with disabilities new opportunities to act independently in the world. However, these empowering devices have their own accessibility challenges. We present a formative study that examines how people with visual and motor disabilities select, adapt, and use mobile devices in their daily lives. We interviewed 20 participants with visual and motor disabilities and asked about their current use of mobile devices, including how they select them, how they use them while away from home, and how they adapt to accessibility challenges when on the go. Following the interviews, 19 participants completed a diary study in which they recorded their experiences using mobile devices for one week. Our results show that people with visual and motor disabilities use a variety of strategies to adapt inaccessible mobile devices and successfully use them to perform everyday tasks and navigate independently. We provide guidelines for more accessible and empowering mobile device design.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1639642.1639663

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some blind users prefer to buy cheaper options despite awareness of more accessible devices.

    “despite the awareness of more accessible devices, some blind users prefer to buy cheaper options [7].”
  • Voice interaction on mobile devices is not always accurate, is difficult in noisy environments, and can be undesirable due to privacy or etiquette concerns.

    “Still, voice interaction has its complications: it is not always accurate, it is difficult to use in noisy environments [10], and can be undesirable due to privacy or etiquette concerns [7].”
  • Users with motor impairments still express enthusiasm about touchscreen devices' potential to empower them with more independence in daily life.

    “Despite those challenges, users with motor impairments still express enthusiasm about touchscreen de vices' potential to empower them with more independence in daily life [2,15,33].”
  • Research suggests difficulties continue to be experienced when using mobile devices despite assistive technologies translating visual content into a non-visual format.

    “While these assistive technologies provide a vital role translating visual content into a non-visual format, research suggests difficulties continue to be experienced when using mobile devices [8,19].”
  • AT, though designed to enhance accessibility, can unintentionally create social barriers and stigma if they visibly mark users as 'other', leading students to avoid otherwise beneficial devices.

    “previous HCI research has shown that AT, though designed to enhance accessibility, can unintentionally create social barriers and stigma if they visibly mark users as 'other' [84], leading students to avoid otherwise beneficial devices [45, 84].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kane, S. K., Jayant, C., Wobbrock, J. O., & Ladner, R. E.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
Publisher
ACM
Published
2009-10-25
Pages
115-122
OpenAlex
W2168842329
Cited by
383
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 11
FWCI
16.24
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
visual impairment, motor impairment, assistive technology, independent navigation, people with disabilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review