The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Guitton, H., & Siegel, S. (1958) · Revue économique · doi:10.2307/3498751 · Cited by 35,245
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282
Hapeman, D. E. (1991) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1991.10484817 · Cited by 9,373
Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences
McGinn, L. C. (1957) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(57)90766-4 · Cited by 7,204
Journal of The American Statistical Association
Fienberg, S. E. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences · doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess1317 · Cited by 6,125
The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning
Pintrich, P. R. (2000) · Handbook of Self-Regulation · doi:10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50043-3 · Cited by 5,173
Handbook of educational psychology
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3084 · Cited by 4,825
(2000) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-109890-2.x5027-6 · Cited by 4,409
Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543065003245 · Cited by 3,334
Handbook of Educational Psychology
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203053874 · Cited by 3,212
Cited by
Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2012) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.003 · Cited by 713
ChatGPT improves creative problem-solving performance in university students: An experimental study
Urban, M., Děchtěrenko, F., Lukavský, J., Hrabalová, V., Svacha, F., Brom, C., & Urban, K. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105031 · Cited by 396
GREENE, J. A., & AZEVEDO, R. (2010) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2010.515935 · Cited by 267
Zepeda, C. D., Richey, J. E., Ronevich, P., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2015) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000022 · Cited by 167
A comparison of high and low achieving students on self-regulated learning variables
DiFrancesca, D., Nietfeld, J. L., & Cao, L. (2016) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.010 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Schraw, G.
- Venue
- Metacognition and Learning
- Published
- 2008-10-24
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-45
- ISSN
- 1556-1623 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-1631
- OpenAlex
- W2052941964
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 18.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11409-008-9031-3
- The paper
- Schraw, G. (2009). A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9031-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
