Cited by 1,066Philosophy and History of SciencePhilosophy, Science, and HistoryDiverse Historical and Scientific Studies

Conceptual Revolutions

Thagard, Paul·1992·Princeton University Press eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9780691186672

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thagard, P.
Corresponding author
Thagard, Paul
Venue
Princeton University Press eBooks
Published
1992-12-31
OpenAlex
W4235165656
Cited by
1,066
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 31
FWCI
51.79
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies
Keywords
conceptual revolutions, conceptual change, scientific revolution, philosophy of science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review