The Spiral Model of Collaborative Knowledge Improvement: An Exploratory Study of a Networked Collaborative Classroom
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is difficult to effectively orchestrate collaborative activities in classrooms.
“However, many studies have shown that it is difficult to effectively orchestrate collaborative activities in classrooms (Chen et al., 2021; Dimitriadis, 2011; Järvenoja et al., 2020; Van Leeuwen & Janssen, 2019).”
From A Feasibility and Implementation Integrity Study of the Community Builder (CoBi): An AI-based Collaboration Support System in K-12 Classrooms (2025) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2021
Cites
Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning
(2012) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6 · Cited by 1,091 · see citing works
Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.748005 · Cited by 525 · see citing works
Design for classroom orchestration
Dillenbourg, P. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.013 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Socio-Cognitive Scaffolding with Computer-Supported Collaboration Scripts: a Meta-Analysis
Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2017) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-016-9361-7 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Effects of prior knowledge on collaborative and individual learning
Zambrano R., J., Kirschner, F., Sweller, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2019) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.05.011 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Popov, V., Biemans, H. J. A., Brinkman, D., Kuznetsov, A. N., & Mulder, M. (2013) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.08.002 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Breideband, T., Bush, J. B., Reitman, J. G., Rose, S., Weatherley, J., Penuel, W. R., & D’Mello, S. K. (2025) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-025-00509-2 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“However, many studies have shown that it is difficult to effectively orchestrate collaborative activities in classrooms (Chen et al., 2021; Dimitriadis, 2011; Järve-noja et al., 2020; Van Leeuwen & Janssen, 2019).”
- Authors
- Chen, W., Tan, J. S. H., & Pi, Z.
- Affiliations
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Wenli
- Tan, Jesmine S. H.
- Pi, Zhongling
- Venue
- International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-35
- ISSN
- 1556-1607 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-1615
- OpenAlex
- W3134571737
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8
- FWCI
- 19.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (publishedVersion)
- NIE Digital Repository (National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Education EDUCATION RESEARCH FUNDING PROGRAMME (OER 17/19 CWL)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- computer-supported collaborative learning, pre-service teachers, teaching model, scaffolding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
