Epidemiology and Disease Burden of Lateral Epicondylitis in the USA: Analysis of 85, 318 Patients
Open accessAbstract
Background: National rates of lateral epicondylitis and surgical treatment are poorly defined. Disease burden of lateral epicondylitis (LE) continues to increase annually. Further study is necessary to optimize treatment algorithms to reduce associated health-care expenditures. Questions/Purposes: The purpose of this study is to review the annual incidence of LE, surgical rates, and associated health-care costs in a population setting. Methods: A national database was queried for LE from 2007 to 2014. Surgical cases were identified and annual rates were recorded. Demographic and epidemiologic data were reported with descriptive statistics, while trends over time were analyzed using linear regression. Results: Eighty-five thousand three hundred eighteen cases of LE were identified. The annual incidence per 10, 000 patients remained constant ( p = 0.304). The proportion of diagnoses in patients <65 years decreased ( p ≤ 0.002) and ≥65 years increased ( p < 0.001) over the study period. One thousand six hundred ninety-four patients (2%) required operative treatment. The annual rate of surgical intervention remained constant ( p = 0.623). The proportion of patients <40 years requiring surgery decreased ( p < 0.001) as the proportion of patients ≥65 years needing surgery increased ( p = 0.003). Total reimbursement for LE procedures during the study period was $7, 220,912. Average per-patient reimbursement was $4263. Both annual total reimbursement ( p = 0.006) and per-patient reimbursement rates ( p = 0.002) significantly increased. Conclusion: The annual incidence of LE and rate of surgical intervention have remained constant from 2007 to 2014. The proportion of patients over >65 years diagnosed with, and receiving surgical treatment for, LE has significantly increased in recent years. Total reimbursement and average per-patient reimbursement have steadily risen, demonstrating the increasing burden of cost on the health-care system.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The general consensus has been to prioritize conservative interventions and restrict surgery to the small proportion of patients who have failed conservative care.
“Despite a lack of strong evidence regarding optimal management, the general consensus has been to prioritize conservative interventions [18,19] and restrict surgery to the small proportion of patients who have failed conservative care [3,4,19,20].”
From Digital Rehabilitation for Elbow Pain Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study (2022) · cites this paper as [4]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Epidemiology and Health Care Burden of Tennis Elbow: A Population-Based Study
Sanders, T. L., Maradit Kremers, H., Bryan, A. J., Ransom, J. E., Smith, J., & Morrey, B. F. (2015) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546514568087 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kachooei AR, Talaei-Khoei M, Faghfouri A, Ring D (2016) Factors associated with operative treatment of enthesopathy of the extensor carpi radialis brevis origin. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. Elsevier Inc. 25:666-670.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Efficacy of Nonoperative Treatments for Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Kim, Y. J., Wood, S. M., Yoon, A. P., Howard, J. C., Yang, L. Y., & Chung, K. C. (2021) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000007440 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Janela, D., Costa, F., Molinos, M., Moulder, R. G., Lains, J., Bento, V., Scheer, J. K., Yanamadala, V., Cohen, S. P., & Correia, F. D. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19159198 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Despite a lack of strong evidence regarding optimal management, the general consensus has been to prioritize conservative interventions [18,19] and restrict surgery to the small proportion of patients who have failed conservative care [3,4,19,20].”
BackgroundResult
- Authors
- Degen, R. M., Conti, M. S., Camp, C. L., Altchek, D. W., Dines, J. S., & Werner, B. C.
- Affiliations
- Hospital for Special Surgery (US)
- University of Virginia Health System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Werner, Brian C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-14
- ISSN
- 1556-3316 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-3324
- PMC
- PMC5786580
- OpenAlex
- W2623107492
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Arthrex
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Keywords
- lateral epicondylitis, incidence, surgical treatment rates, health care costs, reimbursement, disease burden, older adults, temporal trends, musculoskeletal disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review