Cited by 102Tendon Structure and TreatmentElbow and Forearm Trauma TreatmentMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Epidemiology and Disease Burden of Lateral Epicondylitis in the USA: Analysis of 85, 318 Patients

Open access
Degen, Ryan M., Conti, Matthew S., Camp, Christopher L., Altchek, David W., Dines, Joshua S., Werner, Brian C.·2018·HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery

Abstract

Background: National rates of lateral epicondylitis and surgical treatment are poorly defined. Disease burden of lateral epicondylitis (LE) continues to increase annually. Further study is necessary to optimize treatment algorithms to reduce associated health-care expenditures. Questions/Purposes: The purpose of this study is to review the annual incidence of LE, surgical rates, and associated health-care costs in a population setting. Methods: A national database was queried for LE from 2007 to 2014. Surgical cases were identified and annual rates were recorded. Demographic and epidemiologic data were reported with descriptive statistics, while trends over time were analyzed using linear regression. Results: Eighty-five thousand three hundred eighteen cases of LE were identified. The annual incidence per 10, 000 patients remained constant ( p = 0.304). The proportion of diagnoses in patients <65 years decreased ( p ≤ 0.002) and ≥65 years increased ( p < 0.001) over the study period. One thousand six hundred ninety-four patients (2%) required operative treatment. The annual rate of surgical intervention remained constant ( p = 0.623). The proportion of patients <40 years requiring surgery decreased ( p < 0.001) as the proportion of patients ≥65 years needing surgery increased ( p = 0.003). Total reimbursement for LE procedures during the study period was $7, 220,912. Average per-patient reimbursement was $4263. Both annual total reimbursement ( p = 0.006) and per-patient reimbursement rates ( p = 0.002) significantly increased. Conclusion: The annual incidence of LE and rate of surgical intervention have remained constant from 2007 to 2014. The proportion of patients over >65 years diagnosed with, and receiving surgical treatment for, LE has significantly increased in recent years. Total reimbursement and average per-patient reimbursement have steadily risen, demonstrating the increasing burden of cost on the health-care system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11420-017-9559-3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The general consensus has been to prioritize conservative interventions and restrict surgery to the small proportion of patients who have failed conservative care.

    “Despite a lack of strong evidence regarding optimal management, the general consensus has been to prioritize conservative interventions [18,19] and restrict surgery to the small proportion of patients who have failed conservative care [3,4,19,20].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kachooei AR, Talaei-Khoei M, Faghfouri A, Ring D (2016) Factors associated with operative treatment of enthesopathy of the extensor carpi radialis brevis origin. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. Elsevier Inc. 25:666-670.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Degen, R. M., Conti, M. S., Camp, C. L., Altchek, D. W., Dines, J. S., & Werner, B. C.
Affiliations
  • Hospital for Special Surgery (US)
  • University of Virginia Health System (US)
Corresponding author
Werner, Brian C.
Venue
HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery
Published
2018-02
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
9-14
ISSN
  • 1556-3316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3324
OpenAlex
W2623107492
Cited by
102
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Arthrex
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
lateral epicondylitis, incidence, surgical treatment rates, health care costs, reimbursement, disease burden, older adults, temporal trends, musculoskeletal disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review