Cited by 272Tendon Structure and TreatmentElbow and Forearm Trauma TreatmentShoulder Injury and Treatment

The Epidemiology and Health Care Burden of Tennis Elbow: A Population-Based Study

Sanders, Thomas L., Maradit Kremers, Hilal, Bryan, Andrew J., Ransom, Jeanine E., Smith, Jay, Morrey, Bernard F.·2015·The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background: Lateral elbow tendinosis (epicondylitis) is a common condition both in primary care and specialty clinics. Purpose: To evaluate the natural history (ie, incidence, recurrence, and progression to surgery) of lateral elbow tendinosis in a large population. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: The study population comprised a population-based incidence cohort of patients with new-onset lateral elbow tendinosis between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2012. The medical records of a 10% random sample (n = 576) were reviewed to ascertain information on patient and disease characteristics, treatment modalities, recurrence, and progression to surgery. Age- and sex-specific incidence rates were calculated and adjusted to the 2010 US population. Results: The age- and sex-adjusted annual incidence of lateral elbow tendinosis decreased significantly over time from 4.5 per 1000 people in 2000 to 2.4 per 1000 in 2012 ( P < .001). The recurrence rate within 2 years was 8.5% and remained constant over time. The proportion of surgically treated cases within 2 years of diagnosis tripled over time, from 1.1% during the 2000-2002 time period to 3.2% after 2009 ( P < .00001). About 1 in 10 patients with persistent symptoms at 6 months required surgery. Conclusion: The decrease in incidence of lateral elbow tendinosis may represent changes in diagnosis patterns or a true decrease in disease incidence. Natural history data can be used to help guide patients and providers in determining the most appropriate course at a given time in the disease process. The study data suggest that patients without resolution after 6 months of onset may have a prolonged disease course and may need surgical intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0363546514568087

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanders, T. L., Maradit Kremers, H., Bryan, A. J., Ransom, J. E., Smith, J., & Morrey, B. F.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Corresponding author
Sanders, Thomas L.
Venue
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2015-02-05
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
1066-1071
ISSN
  • 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3365
OpenAlex
W2063304669
Cited by
257
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 4
FWCI
16.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The American Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG034676)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Keywords
lateral epicondylitis, epicondylitis, incidence, recurrence, surgical treatment, natural history (disease), healthcare burden, persistent symptoms, diagnosis patterns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review