Cited by 119Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsArtificial Intelligence in Education

Preparing students for future learning with Teachable Agents

Chin, Doris B., Dohmen, Ilsa M., Cheng, Britte H., Oppezzo, Marily A., Chase, Catherine C., Schwartz, Daniel L.·2010·Educational Technology Research and Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11423-010-9154-5

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another AI system used path traversal algorithms to establish causal chains, by which students were provided with elaborated feedback and hints rather than the correct answers; the learning-by-teaching context was constructed by learners' self-organization of interactions and their interpretation of feedback.

    “Another AI system used path traversal algorithms to establish causal chains, by which students were provided with elaborated feedback and hints rather than the correct answers.e learning-by-teaching context was constructed by learners' self-organization of interactions and their interpretation of feedback [38].”
  • AI techniques generally fail to bring 'added-value' to large-scale students because of the concern of costs, and the mainstream is still occupied by 'basic value'.

    “Although AI techniques displayed and predicted smart computation in the education domain, they generally fail to bring”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chin, D. B., Dohmen, I. M., Cheng, B. H., Oppezzo, M. A., Chase, C. C., & Schwartz, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • SRI International (US)
Corresponding author
Chin, Doris B.
Venue
Educational Technology Research and Development
Published
2010-03-05
Volume
58
Issue
6
Pages
649-669
ISSN
  • 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6501
OpenAlex
W2093782067
Cited by
119
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Educational Technology Research and Development (publishedVersion)
  • Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
teachable agents, concept maps, artificial intelligence in education, elementary school science, transfer of learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review