CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 97scientometrics and bibliometrics researchEducational Technology in LearningDiverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trends of educational technology research: more than a decade of international research in six SSCI-indexed refereed journals

Hsu, Yu-Chang, Hung, Jui-Long, Ching, Yu-Hui·2013·Educational Technology Research and Development
DOI 10.1007/s11423-013-9290-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11423-013-9290-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Brown, L. D., & Gardner, J. C. (1985). Using citation analysis to assess the impact of journals and articles on contemporary accounting research (CAR). Journal of Accounting Research, 23(1), 84–109. · DOI
  2. Cameron, T., & Bennett, S. (2010). Learning objects in practice: The integration of reusable learning objects in primary education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 897–908. · DOI
  3. Chang, C. K., Chen, G. D., & Li, L. Y. (2008). Constructing a community of practice to improve coursework activity. Computers & Education, 50(1), 235–247. · DOI
  4. Chang, M., Wang, C.-Y., & Chen, G. D. (2009). National program for e-learning in Taiwan. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 5–17.
  5. Chen, L.-H. (2010). Web-based learning programs: Use by learners with various cognitive styles. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1028–1035. · DOI
  6. Davies, I., & Schwen, T. (1971). Toward a definition of instructional development. Washington: AECT.
  7. Delwiche, A. (2006). Massively multiplayer online games (MMOs) in the new media classroom. Educational Technology & Society, 9(3), 160–172.
  8. Ely, D. P. (1963). The changing role of the audiovisual process: A definition and glossary of related terms. Audiovisual Communication Review, 11((1), Supplement 6), 1–6.
  9. Fayyad, U. M., Pitatesky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P., & Uthurasamy, R. (1996). Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Anaheim, CA: AAAI/MIT Press.
  10. Feenberg, A. (2005). The critical theory of technology: An overview. Tailoring Biotechnologies, 1(1), 47–64.
  11. Feldman, R., & Sanger, J. (2007). The text mining handbook: Advanced approaches in analyzing unstructured data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Flem, J. A., McCracken, J., & Carran, D. (2004). A comparison of two methods of determining interrater reliability. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 29(2), 39–51. · DOI
  13. Gall, J. E., Ku, H.-Y., Gurney, K., Tseng, H.-W., Yeh, H.-T., & Chen, Q. (2010). Citations of ETR&D and related journals, 1990–2004. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(3), 343–353. · DOI
  14. Hsu, C.-K., Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, C.-K. (2010). Development of a reading material recommendation system based on a knowledge engineering approach. Computers & Education, 55(1), 76–83. · DOI
  15. Hsu, Y.-C., Ching, Y.-H., & Grabowski, B. (2009). Web 2.0 technologies as cognitive tools of the new media age. In L. W. H. Tan & R. Subramaniam (Eds.), Handbook of research on new media literacy at the K-12 level: Issues and challenges (pp. 353–371). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. · DOI
  16. Hung, J. L. (2012). Trends of e-learning research from 2000–2008: Use of text mining and bibliometrics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 5–16. · DOI
  17. Hung, J. L., & Zhang, K. (2012). Examining mobile learning trends 2003–2008: A categorical meta-trend analysis using text mining techniques. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24(1), 1–17. · DOI
  18. Jain, A. K., Murthy, M. N., & Flynn, P. J. (1999). Data clustering: A review. ACM Computing Reviews, 31(3), 264–323. · DOI
  19. Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (2007). Definition. In A. Januszewski & M. Molenda (Eds.), Educational technology: A definition with commentary (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.
  20. Johnson, E. P., Perry, J., & Shamir, H. (2010). Variability in reading ability gains as a function of computer-assisted instruction method of presentation. Computers & Education, 55(1), 209–217. · DOI
  21. Kostoff, R. N., Del Río, J. A., Cortés, H. D., Smith, C., Smith, A., Wagner, C., et al. (2007a). Clustering methodologies for identifying country core competencies. Journal of Information Science, 33(1), 21–40. · DOI
  22. Kostoff, R. N., Koytcheff, R. G., & Lau, C. G. Y. (2007b). Technical structure of the global nanoscience and nanotechnology literature. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 9, 701–724. · DOI
  23. Lee, C. B. (2010). The interactions between problem solving and conceptual change: System dynamic modeling as a platform for learning. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1145–1158. · DOI
  24. Lee, M.-H., Wu, Y.-T., & Tsai, C–. C. (2009). Research trends in Science Education from 2003 to 2007: A content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 1999–2020. · DOI
  25. Lu, H. M., Wu, C. Y., & Chiu, C. H. (2009). Research trends in E-learning from 2005 to 2007: A content analysis of the articles published in selected journals. In G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2009 (pp. 2619–2628). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  26. Luppicini, R. (2008). Educational technology at a crossroads: Examining the development of the academic field in Canada. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 281–296.
  27. Maurer, H., & Khan, M. S. (2010). Research trends in the field of e-learning from 2003 to 2008: A scientometric and content analysis for selected journals and conferences using visualization. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 7(1), 5–18. · DOI
  28. McKinney, D., Dyck, J. L., & Luber, E. S. (2009). iTunes university and the classroom: Can podcasts replace professors? Computers & Education, 52(3), 617–623. · DOI
  29. Mihalca, L., & Miclea, M. (2007). Current trends in educational technology research. Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 11(1), 115–129.
  30. Oral, B. (2008). The evaluation of the student teachers’ attitudes toward internet and democracy. Computers & Education, 50(1), 437–445. · DOI
  31. Ozcinar, Z. (2009). The topic of instructional design in research journals: A citation analysis for the years 1980–2008. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(4), 559–580. · DOI
  32. Park, J. (2010). Constructive multiple-choice testing system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 1054–1064. · DOI
  33. Pozzi, F. (2010). Using Jigsaw and Case Study for supporting online collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 55(1), 67–75. · DOI
  34. Ross, S. M., Morrison, G. R., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Educational technology research past and present: Balancing rigor and relevance to impact school learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1(1), 17–35.
  35. Roytek, M. A. (2010). Enhancing instructional design efficiency: Methodologies employed by instructional designers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 170–180. · DOI
  36. Seels, B., & Richey, R. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
  37. Simonson, M., Schlosser, C., & Orellana, A. (2011). Distance education research: A review of the literature. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 23(2–3), 124–142. Retrieved from https://springerlink3.metapress.com/content/k7w20300243822u5/resource-secured/?target=fulltext.pdf&sid=xo5ugt455ilzpwvm02buinzl&sh=www.springerlink.com . Accessed 26 Sept 2011. · DOI
  38. Teo, T. (2009). Modeling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(2), 302–312. · DOI · Paper page
  39. Thelwall, M. (2008). Bibliometrics to webometrics. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 605–621. · DOI
  40. Thomson Reuters (2009). 2009 Journal Citation Reports ® Social Sciences Edition. Retrieved from http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/science_products/a-z/journal_citation_reports/ . Accessed 10 Nov 2010.
  41. Tiernan, P. (2010). Enhancing the learning experience of undergraduate technology students with LabVIEW™ software. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1579–1588. · DOI
  42. Uzunboylu, H., Eriş, H., & Ozcinar, Z. (2011). Results of a citation analysis of knowledge management in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 527–538. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01018.x . · DOI
  43. Wagner, N., Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2008). Who is responsible for e-learning success in higher education? A stakeholders’ analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 26–36.
  44. Wang, Q. (2008). Student-facilitators’ roles in moderating online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 859–874. · DOI
  45. Wang, S., & Heffernan, N. (2010). Ethical issues in computer-assisted language learning: Perceptions of teachers and learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 796–813. · DOI
  46. Winn, W. D. (2002). Current trends in educational technology research: The study of learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 1(3), 331–351. · DOI
  47. Wisdom, J. P., White, N., Goldsmith, K., Bielavitz, S., Rees, A., & Davis, C. (2007). Systems limitations hamper integration of accessible information technology in northwest U.S. K-12 schools. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 222–232.
  48. Zhang, K., & Hung, J. L. (2006). E-learning in Taiwan: Policies, practices, and problems. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 2(1), I37–I52. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hsu, Y.-C., Hung, J.-L., & Ching, Y.-H.
Affiliations
Boise State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hsu, Yu-Chang
ORCID
Venue
Educational Technology Research and Development
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2013-04-10
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
685-705
ISSN
  • 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6501
DOI
10.1007/s11423-013-9290-9
OpenAlex
W1981490978
Cited by
97
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
7.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Educational Technology Research and Development (publishedVersion)
  • Scholar Works (Boise State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology in Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
Keywords
educational technology research, research trends, research areas, research productivity, critical theory of technology, international research collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review