Cited by 1,009Technology Adoption and User BehaviourGender and Technology in EducationEducation and Technology Integration

Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers

Teo, Timothy·2009·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teo, T.
Affiliations
Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Corresponding author
Teo, Timothy
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
302-312
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121918274
Cited by
1,009
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 33
FWCI
42.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
Keywords
technology acceptance, pre-service teachers, teacher professional development, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, computer self-efficacy, technological complexity, facilitating conditions, behavioral intention, technology acceptance model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review