Cited by 93Gender and Technology in EducationDigital literacy in educationICT in Developing Communities

Are gender differences in perceived and demonstrated technology literacy significant? It depends on the model

Hohlfeld, Tina N., Ritzhaupt, Albert D., Barron, Ann E.·2013·Educational Technology Research and Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11423-013-9304-7

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hohlfeld, T. N., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Barron, A. E.
Affiliations
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Hohlfeld, Tina N.
Venue
Educational Technology Research and Development
Published
2013-06-11
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
639-663
ISSN
  • 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6501
OpenAlex
W2126325885
Cited by
92
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Technology Research and Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
Keywords
gender differences, ICT literacy, technological literacy, perceived skills, attitudes toward computers, computer use frequency, eighth grade students, multilevel modeling, performance-based assessment, career choice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review