The effects of using mobile devices on language learning: a meta-analysis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chen et al. examined the effects of mobile devices on language learning across different intervention durations.
“For example, Chen et al. [50] examined the effects of mobile devices on language learning across different intervention durations.”
From A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Effect of Chatbot Technology Use in Sustainable Education (2023) · cites this paper as [50]
Cites
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645 · see citing works
Publication bias in clinical research
Easterbrook, P. J., Gopalan, R., Berlin, J. A., & Matthews, D. R. (1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-y · Cited by 3,109 · see citing works
A Fail-Safe N for Effect Size in Meta-Analysis
Orwin, R. G. (1983) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164923 · Cited by 2,064 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The third approach uses Orwin’s Fail-safe N proposed by Orwin (1983).”
MethodSung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Liu, T.-C. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008 · Cited by 1,574 · see citing works
Mobile-assisted ESL/EFL vocabulary learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Lin, J.-J., & Lin, H. (2019) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1541359 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Testing enhances learning: A review of the literature
Binks, S. (2018) · Journal of Professional Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.08.008 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deng, X., & Yu, Z. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15042940 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
“[50], the researchers decided to recode this variable as a categorical one for further analysis.”
BackgroundExploring the Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom on STEM Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis
Gong, J., Cai, S., & Cheng, M. (2024) · Technology, Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-023-09700-7 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chen, Z., Chen, W., Jia, J., & An, H.
- Affiliations
- Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
- University of Virginia (US)
- Peking University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Zhenzhen
- Venue
- Educational Technology Research and Development
- Published
- 2020-06-27
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1769-1789
- ISSN
- 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6501
- OpenAlex
- W3037824762
- Semantic Scholar
- 46d646823e8cf6132f8e36b75b0fd28b2a6840d1
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 2.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Technology Research and Development (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Education Sciences Planning Office (DCA170308)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- mobile-assisted language learning, mobile devices, language learning effectiveness, language skills, target language, first and second language, moderators, effect size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
