Cited by 42Innovative Teaching MethodsInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsOnline and Blended Learning

Exploring the Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom on STEM Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis

Open access
Gong, Jin, Cai, Sanfa, Cheng, Ming·2024·Technology, Knowledge and Learning

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This meta-analysis of 53 studies found a small, statistically significant positive effect of flipped classrooms over traditional instruction on STEM higher-education student achievement. Moderator analyses suggest effects vary with course design features, especially in-class activity type, but not with discipline, class level, study duration, or most control variables.

Key findings

  • Across 53 studies involving 3,740 flipped-classroom students and 3,793 traditional-classroom students, flipped learning produced an overall significant effect: Hedges’ g = 0.263, 95% CI [0.190, 0.337], Z = 7.03, p < 0.0001.
  • Heterogeneity was moderate (Q = 108.68, df = 52, p = 0.0001; I² = 52.2%), and publication bias was not significant (Begg z = 0.74, p = 0.4615; Egger t = 0.62, p = 0.5350; fail-safe N = 1,034).
  • Significant discipline effects appeared only for mathematics (g = 0.316), medical science (g = 0.273), and technology (g = 0.210); other disciplines had non-significant effects, often based on few studies.
  • Course design mattered: in-class activities combining group and individual tasks had g = 0.380 versus group-only g = 0.115 and individual-only g = 0.278 (between-level Q = 15.08, df = 2, p = 0.0005); post-class quizzes plus exercises had g = 0.578 versus quizzes g = 0.275 and exercises g = 0.220; link activities had g = 0.338 versus no link activity g = 0.208.

Methods

  • PRISMA-guided meta-analysis searching PubMed, Scopus, ERIC, Web of Science, and Cochrane for English-language, peer-reviewed studies from January 2010 to July 2023; inclusion required higher-education STEM courses comparing flipped and traditional classrooms with adequate quantitative outcome data.
  • From 1,942 records, 53 articles were included after screening; data extracted included discipline, class level, study duration, group/instructor equivalence, and pre-class, link, in-class, and post-class activities.
  • Effect sizes were computed as Hedges’ g using a random-effects model in R 4.1.2 with the metafor package; heterogeneity was assessed with Q and I², and publication bias with funnel plot, Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation, Egger’s regression, and classic fail-safe N.

Limitations

  • The authors state that intervention and course-design descriptions varied in quality and completeness, making accurate coding difficult, and they call for clearer reporting of video duration, time allocation, and small-group organization.
  • The authors state that the review covered only a few STEM subsets, was limited to English-language publications, and did not account for potential language bias; they also note that academic performance is not the only relevant educational outcome.
  • Evident from the text: several moderator subgroups were based on very few studies—e.g., technology k = 3, mathematics k = 5, instructor “not equal” k = 3, group equivalence “not equal” k = 1—so those subgroup estimates should be treated cautiously.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10758-023-09700-7

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

5 of 36 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationcitation

    This finding is in line with previous meta-analyses showing that formative assessments between pre-class and in-class activities can greatly enhance learning.

    “This finding is in line with previous meta-analyses (Hew & Lo, 2018b;Låg & Sæle, 2019;Lo & Hew, 2019;van Alten et al., 2019) showing that formative assessments (e.g., quizzes or reviews) used between pre-class activities and in-class activities can greatly enhance students' learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hew & Lo, 2018b source

      The Discussion and Conclusions report that quizzes assessing pre-class material at the start of an in-class session made flipped classrooms more effective in health professions education. They do not establish the same result for formative assessments such as reviews generally, or quantify the added benefit as a great enhancement. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Låg & Sæle, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Lo & Hew, 2019 source
  • Findingown data

    The flipped classroom had a significant positive effect on student performance in mathematics (g = 0.316).

    “There were only three significant effects: mathematics (g = 0.316), medical science (g = 0.273), and technology (g = 0.210).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Instructor equivalence did not result in any difference in effect sizes (Q = 5.30, df = 2, p = 0.0705).

    “Both group equivalence (Q = 4.36, df = 2, p = 0.1130) and instructor equivalence (Q = 5.30, df = 2, p = 0.0705) did not result in any difference in the effect sizes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The between-level difference for pre-class activity was not statistically significant (Q = 0.28, df = 2, p = 0.869).

    “The effects of between-level difference of the link activity (Q = 3.13, df = 1, p = 0.077), pre-class activity (Q = 0.28, df = 2, p = 0.869), and post-class activity (Q = 4.39, df = 4, p = 0.3562) were not statistically significant while the between-level difference was statistically significant for the in-class activity (Q = 15.08,df = 2, p = 0.0005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The flipped classroom effect was highest in studies using both quizzes and exercises after class (g = 0.578) compared with when only one of these activities was used.

    “The flipped classroom effect was highest in studies using both quizzes and exercises (g = 0.578) compared with when only one of these activities was used after class.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
  • May combine two claims. 24
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Only peer-reviewed journal studies were included, as their results are believed to be of sufficient quality.

    “Only peer-reviewed journal studies were included, as their results are believed to be of sufficient quality (Cheng et al., 2019a;Hew & Lo, 2018a;Korpershoek et al., 2016;Lo et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cheng et al., 2019a source
    • cites Hew & Lo, 2018a source
    • cites Korpershoek et al., 2016 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Previous reviews found small effect sizes under a random effects model across engineering, mathematics, and health profession education.

    “According to some previous reviews (Chen et al., 2018;Hew & Lo, 2018a;Lo et al., 2017), the effect sizes were small under a random effect sizes model across three disciplines (engineering, mathematics, and health profession education).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Chen et al., 2018 source

      The Methods (Data synthesis; page unavailable) say the review pooled effect sizes using a random-effects model. The Results (Main and subgroup meta-analyses; page unavailable) report effects for health-science education, including an examination-score effect of 0.53 in medical education, but do not establish that the effects were uniformly small. This source does not separately report findings for engineering or mathematics; the other citations may address those disciplines. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Hew & Lo, 2018a source
    • cites Lo et al., 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Hew & Lo (2018a) found that using quizzes at the start of face-to-face courses can help students recall knowledge, identify misconceptions, and improve learning outcomes.

    “(Hew & Lo, 2018a) found in their meta-analysis that using quizzes at the start of face-to-face courses can help students recall knowledge and identify possible misconceptions and so improve learning outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hew & Lo, 2018a source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Most studies in the meta-analysis were conducted within 8 weeks; one lasted half a semester and two lasted only a few days.

    “Most of the studies in our meta-analysis were conducted within 8 weeks (Cabi & Emine, 2018;Karabatak & Polat, 2020;Meng et al., 2022;Muzyk et al., 2015;Senousy et al., 2017;Wang et al., 2022;Wilson & Hobbs, 2023), and one studies lasted for half a semester (Chien & Hsieh, 2018) and two studies only lasted for a few days (Arya et al., 2020;Casselman et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cabi & Emine, 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Karabatak & Polat, 2020 source
    • cites Meng et al., 2022 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Publication bias tests showed symmetry: Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation z = 0.74, one-tailed p = 0.4615; Egger's linear regression t = 0.62, one-tailed p = 0.5350; and fail-safe N = 1034 additional missing studies with zero mean effect size would be required to make the overall effect statistically insignificant.

    “We conducted two statistical analyses which supported the presence of symmetry: the Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation test (z = 0.74, one-tailed p = 0.4615); and Egger's Linear regression test (t = 0.62, one-tailed p = 0.5350).Both tests indicated that publication bias was not significant.We also conducted a classic fail-safe N test which showed that 1034 additional missing studies with zero mean”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Flipped classroom courses lasting less than a semester produced better student performance (g = 0.343) than courses lasting a semester or more (g = 0.242), and effect sizes were smaller in studies with longer durations than shorter durations.

    “We found that where flipped classroom courses lasted less than a semester, the students performed better (g = 0.343) than those in flipped classroom courses extending for a semester or more (g = 0.242).”
    • Also stated in: § 4.1. Flipped classroom promotes student achievement · plain
      “However, it was observed that the effect sizes of the flipped classroom intervention were smaller in studies with longer durations than those with shorter durations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The flipped classroom effect was stronger when students were engaged in both group activities and individual tasks (g = 0.380) than when they participated only in group activities (g = 0.115) or only in individual tasks (g = 0.278).

    “The flipped classroom effect was stronger when students were engaged in both group activities and individual tasks (g = 0.380), compared to when they participated only in group activities (g = 0.115) or only in individual tasks (g = 0.278).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For both shorter and longer durations of study intervention, students in the flipped classroom demonstrated a significant performance advantage over those in the traditional classroom.

    “For both shorter and longer durations of study intervention, students in the flipped classroom demonstrated a significant performance advantage over those in the traditional classroom.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The meta-analysis found no evidence of publication bias; the overall mean effect size was not inflated by publication bias.

    “with no evidence of publication bias.”
    • Also stated in: § 3.4. Analysis of publication bias · boosted
      “Based on the visual inspection of the funnel plot, the statistical analyses, and the fail-safe N test, it can be concluded that the overall mean effect size was not inflated by publication bias.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For studies with a duration of less than a semester, the flipped classroom had a slightly stronger effect (g = 0.343), and students in the flipped classroom significantly outperformed those in the traditional classroom.

    “The study duration of less than a semester (k = 13) had a slightly stronger effect size (g = 0.343).When the study duration for flipped classrooms was less than a semester, students in the flipped classroom condition significantly outperformed students in the traditional classroom.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The flipped classroom had a moderate effect on student performance when students engaged in either exercises (g = 0.220) or quizzes (g = 0.275) after class.

    “The flipped classroom had a moderate effect on student performance when students engaged in either exercises or quizzes after class (g = 0.220, g = 0.275).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The flipped classroom had a weak effect on student performance when the instructor was the same between the two models (g = 0.227) or when this information was not reported (g = 0.270).

    “The flipped classroom had a weak effect on student performance where the instructor was the same between the two models (g = 0.227) or where this information was not reported (g = 0.270).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Studies using different instructors across traditional and flipped classroom conditions yielded a moderate effect size (g = 0.471), based on only three studies.

    “Studies using different instructors across the traditional and flipped classroom conditions yielded a moderate effect size (g = 0.471), although this result was based on only three studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Our results were inconsistent with previous findings, with the effect size of 0.316 for mathematics being the largest of the disciplines analyzed.

    “Our results were inconsistent with these findings, with the effect size of 0.316 for mathematics being the largest of the disciplines analyzed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There was statistically significant and moderate heterogeneity among the 53 included studies (Q = 108.68, df = 52, p = 0.0001; I2 = 52.2%).

    “The heterogeneity analyses showed statistically significant variation among the 53 studies (Q = 108.68,df = 52, p = 0.0001), and the level of observed heterogeneity was moderate (I 2 = 52.2%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    28 of the studies included in the meta-analysis were published after 2020, and only two of them considered the influence of Covid-19 on the delivery mode of in-class activities.

    “It is also noticeable that even though 28 of the studies included in our meta-analysis were published after 2020, only two of them considered the influence of Covid-19 on the delivery mode of in-class activities (Ng, 2023;Sezer & Esenay, 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ng, 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Sezer & Esenay, 2022 source
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    An effect size of 0.26 is comparable to student-focused interventions and instructional strategies such as individualized instruction, matching style of learning, student-centered teaching, collaborative learning, discovery-based learning, and adjunct aids, and is significantly larger than effect sizes due to feedback strategies and technology approaches such as one-on-one laptops and web-based学习.

    “According to analysis standards for influences on student outcomes (Hattie, 2017), an effect size of 0.26 is comparable to those associated with student-focused interventions such as individualized instruction, matching style of learning, and student-centered teaching, as well as those associated with instructional strategies such as collaborative learning, discovery-based learning, and adjunct ai”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hattie, 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    If STEM teaching and learning were not already well structured and scaffolded, the added value of the flipped classroom might be more significant.

    “If this were not the case, the added value of the flipped classroom might be more significant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The literature selection process followed the PRISMA Statement.

    “The literature selection process followed the Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Statement (Moher et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Moher et al., 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In STEM courses, the flipped classroom's advantages may translate to only modest impacts on student performance partly because teaching and learning is already well structured and incorporates scaffolding for students.

    “It is possible that in STEM courses the advantages of the flipped classroom approach translate to only modest impacts on student performance partly because the teaching and learning is already well structured and incorporates scaffolding for students.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: STEM teaching and learning is already well structured and incorporates scaffolding for students.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The review used standard tests to identify publication bias: funnel plot assessment, Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation, Egger's linear regression, and classic fail-safe N.

    “Therefore, the following standard tests were used to identify whether the present review suffered from publication bias, including: 1) assessing the funnel plot (J.Light & B. Pillemer, 1986); 2) computing the Begg & Mazumdar rank correlation (Begg & Mazumdar, 1994); 3) calculating Egger's linear regression (Egger et al., 1997); 4) conducting the classic fail-safe N test (Rosenthal, 1979).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites J.Light & B. Pillemer, 1986 source
    • cites Begg & Mazumdar, 1994 source
    • cites Egger et al., 1997 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The flipped classroom promotes student achievement in STEM education, with students in flipped classrooms outperforming those in traditional classrooms by 0.26 standard deviations.

    “Overall, we found a small positive effect (g = 0.26) of the flipped classroom on assessed student learning outcomes.In other words, students in the flipped classroom outperformed their counterparts in the traditional classroom by 0.26 standard deviations.”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
      “It showed an overall significant effect in favor of flipped learning over traditional learning models for STEM education”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Two authors independently extracted the data, and discrepancies were reviewed, discussed, and resolved.

    “Two authors independently extracted the data, and any discrepancies between their extracted data were reviewed, discussed, and resolved.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The articles in this review only covered a few subsets of STEM disciplines, and it is not clear whether the conclusions can be applied to all STEM education contexts.

    “Second, although we searched for publications across different databases, the articles in this review only covered a few subsets of STEM disciplines, and it is not clear whether the conclusions can be applied to all STEM education contexts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The difference in effect when instructors were the same might be attributed to instructors applying flipped classroom skills, such as motivating students towards active learning, even in the traditional classroom, which could moderate the effects.

    “This difference might be attributed to the instructors applying the skills utilized in the flipped classroom approach, such as motivating students towards more active learning, even within the traditional classroom setting, which could moderate the effects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The impact of potential language bias was not taken into consideration.

    “The impact of potential language bias was not taken into consideration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Murphy et al. found that the combined post-class approach was an effective way for students to reflect on knowledge learned in class and to help instructors evaluate student learning performance and reflect on the flipped classroom model as a whole.

    “The researchers found that this combined approach to post-class activity was an effective way for students to reflect on knowledge learned in class and to help instructors evaluate student learning performance and reflect on the flipped classroom model as a whole.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Murphy et al., 2016 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Educational goals extend to areas including ethics, lifelong career orientation, civic engagement, and communication.

    “They extend to areas including ethics, lifelong career orientation, civic engagement, and communication (National Academies of Sciences & Medicine, 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites National Academies of Sciences & Medicine, 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Feedback is one of the most potent factors affecting learning and achievement.

    “Given that feedback is one of the most potent factors affecting learning and achievement (Hattie & Timperley, 2007;Shute, 2008), we suggest that it may play a crucial role in driving the effectiveness of the flipped classroom approach.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hattie & Timperley, 2007 source
    • cites Shute, 2008 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    This result is consistent with Lo & Hew (2019), which found that the combination of individual tasks and small-group activities produced a larger effect size.

    “This result is consistent with the study by (Lo & Hew, 2019) which also found that the combination of individual tasks and small-group activities produced a larger effect size.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lo & Hew, 2019 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The selection of reviewed articles was limited to those published in English.

    “Although the reviewed articles are from across different continents, the selection was limited to those published in English.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Combining group activities and individual tasks during class and providing quizzes and exercises after class are beneficial components that can improve student achievement in STEM education.

    “Combining group activities and individual tasks during class and providing quizzes and exercises after class are beneficial components that can improve student achievement in STEM education, offering promising directions for the future implementation of flipped classroom courses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Students can acquire a deeper understanding of the subject through arguing, collaborating, and knowledge sharing during group activities, which can also enhance their learning when they study individually.

    “It may be that students can acquire a deeper understanding of the subject through arguing, collaborating, and knowledge sharing during group activities, which can also enhance their learning when they study individually.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The results of the moderator analysis imply that the flipped classroom can significantly improve students' academic performance in engineering, mathematics, and health profession education.

    “The results of the moderator analysis imply that the flipped classroom can significantly improve students' academic performance in the fields of engineering, mathematics, and health profession education.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    This finding aligns with Murphy et al. (2016), who required students to do online quizzes and hand in assigned homework problems from the textbook.

    “This finding aligns with a study by (Murphy et al., 2016) who required students to do online quizzes and hand in assigned homework problems from the textbook.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Murphy et al., 2016 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The effect may be due to interactions among students during small-group activities, which can have additional cognitive benefits for individual learning performance.

    “The effect may be due to interactions among students during small-group activities which can have additional cognitive benefits for their individual learning performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Descriptions of interventions and course designs in the reviewed articles varied in quality and completeness, making them difficult to code accurately.

    “First, the descriptions of the interventions and course designs in the reviewed articles varied in quality and completeness, making them difficult to code accurately.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Many articles only mentioned small group activities or collaborative team-based learning but did not specify how the activities were organized and how long they lasted.

    “Many articles only mentioned the use of small group activities or collaborative team-based learning but did not specify how the activities were organized and how long they lasted.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Educational goals encompass more than academic attainment.

    “Finally, educational goals encompass more than academic attainment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites National Academies of Sciences & Medicine, 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

39 of 39
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a lack of systematic and quantitative assessments of the effectiveness of the flipped classroom model on student performance.

    “However, there is a lack of systematic and quantitative assessments of the effectiveness of the flipped classroom model on student performance.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The flipped classroom allows students to study the content at their own pace.

    “One beneficial aspect of the flipped classroom is that it allows students to study the content at their own pace.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    With pre-recorded videos, students can pause, review, and reflect as many times as they want before class.

    “With pre-recorded videos, students can pause, review, and reflect as many times as they want before class.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    STEM teaching and learning is already well structured and incorporates scaffolding for students.

    “It is possible that in STEM courses the advantages of the flipped classroom approach translate to only modest impacts on student performance partly because the teaching and learning is already well structured and incorporates scaffolding for students.”
4 of 4

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentz = 7.03reported p < .0001 · recomputed p < .001

    “Z = 7.03, p < .0001”

1 of 1

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conclusion names the wrong disciplines with significant effects

    Major

    The conclusion identifies engineering, mathematics, and health profession education as fields with significant improvement. The results instead identify mathematics, medical science, and technology as the only three disciplines with significant effects.

  • Abstract claims an association with research control methods

    Major

    The abstract says student performance was associated with research control methods, but the reported tests found no effect-size difference for either control-level moderator.

  • Link-activity effect sizes disagree with Table 7

    Minor

    The prose gives g = 0.233 with a link activity and g = 0.108 without one. Table 7 reports g = 0.338 and g = 0.208, respectively; the prose values appear to come from the table's confidence-interval limits.

  • Same-instructor effect size differs from Table 6

    Minor

    The discussion reports g = 0.271 for the 28 same-instructor studies, whereas Table 6 reports g = 0.227 for those studies.

4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P. (2019b). Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 793–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7 · DOI · Paper page
  2. DeSantis, J., Van Curen, R., Putsch, J., & Metzger, J. (2015). Do students learn more from a flip? An exploration of the efficacy of flipped and traditional lessons. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 26(1), 39–63.
  3. Etemi, B. P., & Uzunboylu, H. (2020). The effects of flipped learning method on students’ perception and learning of java programming. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(4), 1372–1382.
  4. Hattie, J. (2017). Visible learning plus: 250+ Influences on student achievement. Visible learning plus.
  5. Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2018b). Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: A meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z · DOI · Paper page
  6. Låg, T., & Sæle, R. G. (2019). Does the flipped classroom improve student learning and satisfaction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aera Open, 5(3), 1–17. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gong, J., Cai, S., & Cheng, M.
Affiliations
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
Corresponding author
Gong, Jin
Venue
Technology, Knowledge and Learning
Published
2023-11-15
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
1129-1150
ISSN
  • 2211-1662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2211-1670
OpenAlex
W4388701437
Cited by
42
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 9
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Technology Knowledge and Learning (publishedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
flipped classroom, STEM education, academic performance, higher education, active learning, pre-class activities, classroom activities, implementation strategies, conventional instruction comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-26.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-26.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review