Exploring the Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom on STEM Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis
Open accessAI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This meta-analysis of 53 studies found a small, statistically significant positive effect of flipped classrooms over traditional instruction on STEM higher-education student achievement. Moderator analyses suggest effects vary with course design features, especially in-class activity type, but not with discipline, class level, study duration, or most control variables.
Key findings
- Across 53 studies involving 3,740 flipped-classroom students and 3,793 traditional-classroom students, flipped learning produced an overall significant effect: Hedges’ g = 0.263, 95% CI [0.190, 0.337], Z = 7.03, p < 0.0001.
- Heterogeneity was moderate (Q = 108.68, df = 52, p = 0.0001; I² = 52.2%), and publication bias was not significant (Begg z = 0.74, p = 0.4615; Egger t = 0.62, p = 0.5350; fail-safe N = 1,034).
- Significant discipline effects appeared only for mathematics (g = 0.316), medical science (g = 0.273), and technology (g = 0.210); other disciplines had non-significant effects, often based on few studies.
- Course design mattered: in-class activities combining group and individual tasks had g = 0.380 versus group-only g = 0.115 and individual-only g = 0.278 (between-level Q = 15.08, df = 2, p = 0.0005); post-class quizzes plus exercises had g = 0.578 versus quizzes g = 0.275 and exercises g = 0.220; link activities had g = 0.338 versus no link activity g = 0.208.
Methods
- PRISMA-guided meta-analysis searching PubMed, Scopus, ERIC, Web of Science, and Cochrane for English-language, peer-reviewed studies from January 2010 to July 2023; inclusion required higher-education STEM courses comparing flipped and traditional classrooms with adequate quantitative outcome data.
- From 1,942 records, 53 articles were included after screening; data extracted included discipline, class level, study duration, group/instructor equivalence, and pre-class, link, in-class, and post-class activities.
- Effect sizes were computed as Hedges’ g using a random-effects model in R 4.1.2 with the metafor package; heterogeneity was assessed with Q and I², and publication bias with funnel plot, Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation, Egger’s regression, and classic fail-safe N.
Limitations
- The authors state that intervention and course-design descriptions varied in quality and completeness, making accurate coding difficult, and they call for clearer reporting of video duration, time allocation, and small-group organization.
- The authors state that the review covered only a few STEM subsets, was limited to English-language publications, and did not account for potential language bias; they also note that academic performance is not the only relevant educational outcome.
- Evident from the text: several moderator subgroups were based on very few studies—e.g., technology k = 3, mathematics k = 5, instructor “not equal” k = 3, group equivalence “not equal” k = 1—so those subgroup estimates should be treated cautiously.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
5 of 36 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
This finding is in line with previous meta-analyses showing that formative assessments between pre-class and in-class activities can greatly enhance learning.
“This finding is in line with previous meta-analyses (Hew & Lo, 2018b;Låg & Sæle, 2019;Lo & Hew, 2019;van Alten et al., 2019) showing that formative assessments (e.g., quizzes or reviews) used between pre-class activities and in-class activities can greatly enhance students' learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Hew & Lo, 2018b source
The Discussion and Conclusions report that quizzes assessing pre-class material at the start of an in-class session made flipped classrooms more effective in health professions education. They do not establish the same result for formative assessments such as reviews generally, or quantify the added benefit as a great enhancement. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Låg & Sæle, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Lo & Hew, 2019 source
- Findingown data
The flipped classroom had a significant positive effect on student performance in mathematics (g = 0.316).
“There were only three significant effects: mathematics (g = 0.316), medical science (g = 0.273), and technology (g = 0.210).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Instructor equivalence did not result in any difference in effect sizes (Q = 5.30, df = 2, p = 0.0705).
“Both group equivalence (Q = 4.36, df = 2, p = 0.1130) and instructor equivalence (Q = 5.30, df = 2, p = 0.0705) did not result in any difference in the effect sizes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The between-level difference for pre-class activity was not statistically significant (Q = 0.28, df = 2, p = 0.869).
“The effects of between-level difference of the link activity (Q = 3.13, df = 1, p = 0.077), pre-class activity (Q = 0.28, df = 2, p = 0.869), and post-class activity (Q = 4.39, df = 4, p = 0.3562) were not statistically significant while the between-level difference was statistically significant for the in-class activity (Q = 15.08,df = 2, p = 0.0005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The flipped classroom effect was highest in studies using both quizzes and exercises after class (g = 0.578) compared with when only one of these activities was used.
“The flipped classroom effect was highest in studies using both quizzes and exercises (g = 0.578) compared with when only one of these activities was used after class.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
The flipped classroom had a moderate effect on student performance when students used video lectures only for pre-class activity (g = 0.252).
“The flipped classroom had a moderate effect on student performance when students used video lectures only (g = 0.252) or both video lectures and text-based materials (g = 0.286).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The effect of text-based materials alone for pre-class activity was non-significant (g = 0.213).
“The effect of text-based materials alone (k = 2) was non-significant (g = 0.213).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For studies with a duration of a semester or more, the flipped classroom had a trivial to weak effect on student performance (g = 0.242).
“As shown in Table 4, the study duration of a semester or more represented the majority of studies (k = 40), with an overall trivial to weak effect size (g = 0.242).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The flipped classroom was associated with better student performance across all class levels.
“The flipped classroom was associated with better student performance across all class levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The flipped classroom was likely to have a stronger effect on student performance at the introductory level (g = 0.281) than at the upper level (g = 0.216).
“The flipped classroom was likely to have a stronger effect on student performance if the class was taught at the introductory level (g = 0.281), compared with the upper level (g = 0.216).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The flipped classroom had a significant positive effect on student performance in medical science (g = 0.273).
“There were only three significant effects: mathematics (g = 0.316), medical science (g = 0.273), and technology (g = 0.210).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In this meta-analysis, the flipped classroom had an advantage in medical science, mathematics, and technology.
“In our meta-analysis, there was an advantage of the flipped classroom in medical science, mathematics, and technology, but no significant effect was found in the other seven STEM disciplines analyzed, although one should be cautious about interpreting effect sizes based on small numbers of studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The flipped classroom effect was weaker when students were at equivalent levels across traditional and flipped modes (g = 0.237) than when students were not equal at the beginning (g = 0.326) or when this information was not given (g = 0.375).
“The flipped classroom was likely to have a weaker effect on student performance if the students were at equivalent levels across the traditional and flipped modes of teaching (g = 0.237), compared with when the students were not equal at the beginning (g = 0.326) or studies where this information was not given (g = 0.375).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The flipped classroom had a significant positive effect on student performance in technology (g = 0.210).
“There were only three significant effects: mathematics (g = 0.316), medical science (g = 0.273), and technology (g = 0.210).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The between-level difference for post-class activity was not statistically significant (Q = 4.39, df = 4, p = 0.3562).
“The effects of between-level difference of the link activity (Q = 3.13, df = 1, p = 0.077), pre-class activity (Q = 0.28, df = 2, p = 0.869), and post-class activity (Q = 4.39, df = 4, p = 0.3562) were not statistically significant while the between-level difference was statistically significant for the in-class activity (Q = 15.08,df = 2, p = 0.0005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The between-level difference for link activity was not statistically significant (Q = 3.13, df = 1, p = 0.077).
“The effects of between-level difference of the link activity (Q = 3.13, df = 1, p = 0.077), pre-class activity (Q = 0.28, df = 2, p = 0.869), and post-class activity (Q = 4.39, df = 4, p = 0.3562) were not statistically significant while the between-level difference was statistically significant for the in-class activity (Q = 15.08,df = 2, p = 0.0005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Discipline did not significantly moderate the effect size (Q = 3.01, df = 9, p = 0.964).
“The results indicated that the between-level difference was not statistically significant for discipline (Q = 3.01, df = 9, p = 0.964), class level (Q = 0.87, df = 1, p = 0.351), and study duration (Q = 0.71, df = 1, p = 0.398), which suggested no evidence of heterogeneity across studies for these three moderators.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Group equivalence did not result in any difference in effect sizes (Q = 4.36, df = 2, p = 0.1130).
“Both group equivalence (Q = 4.36, df = 2, p = 0.1130) and instructor equivalence (Q = 5.30, df = 2, p = 0.0705) did not result in any difference in the effect sizes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The flipped classroom had a moderate effect on student performance when students used both video lectures and text-based materials for pre-class activity (g = 0.286).
“The flipped classroom had a moderate effect on student performance when students used video lectures only (g = 0.252) or both video lectures and text-based materials (g = 0.286).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In this meta-analysis, no significant effect of the flipped classroom was found in the other seven STEM disciplines analyzed.
“In our meta-analysis, there was an advantage of the flipped classroom in medical science, mathematics, and technology, but no significant effect was found in the other seven STEM disciplines analyzed, although one should be cautious about interpreting effect sizes based on small numbers of studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The between-level difference for in-class activity was statistically significant (Q = 15.08, df = 2, p = 0.0005).
“The effects of between-level difference of the link activity (Q = 3.13, df = 1, p = 0.077), pre-class activity (Q = 0.28, df = 2, p = 0.869), and post-class activity (Q = 4.39, df = 4, p = 0.3562) were not statistically significant while the between-level difference was statistically significant for the in-class activity (Q = 15.08,df = 2, p = 0.0005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Study duration did not significantly moderate the effect size (Q = 0.71, df = 1, p = 0.398).
“The results indicated that the between-level difference was not statistically significant for discipline (Q = 3.01, df = 9, p = 0.964), class level (Q = 0.87, df = 1, p = 0.351), and study duration (Q = 0.71, df = 1, p = 0.398), which suggested no evidence of heterogeneity across studies for these three moderators.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A subgroup comparison based on class level found no statistically significant difference between the summary effect sizes of the various groups.
“After performing a subgroup comparison based on class level, the analysis revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between the summary effect sizes of the various groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A random-effects meta-analysis of 53 included articles (3740 flipped-classroom students and 3793 traditional-classroom students) showed a statistically significant overall effect favoring the flipped classroom on student performance (Hedges' g = 0.263, 95% CI [0.190, 0.337], Z = 7.03, p < 0.0001).
“As Fig. 2 indicates, a random-effects meta-analysis of the 53 included articles involving 3740 students exposed to flipped classrooms and 3793 students exposed to traditional classrooms showed an overall significant effect in favor of the flipped classroom in terms of student performance (Hedges' g = 0.263, 95% [0.190, 0.337], Z = 7.03, p < 0.0001).”
- Also stated in: § 4.1. Flipped classroom promotes student achievement · plain
“Overall, we found a small positive effect (g = 0.26) of the flipped classroom on assessed student learning outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 4.1. Flipped classroom promotes student achievement · plain
- Findingown data
The flipped classroom effect was slightly stronger when the study used a link activity (pre-class quiz or questionnaire) (g = 0.233) than when it used no link activity (g = 0.108).
“As shown in Table 7, the flipped classroom effect was slightly stronger when the study used a link activity (pre-class quiz or questionnaire) (g = 0.233), compared to when the study used no link activity (g = 0.108).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Class level did not significantly moderate the effect size (Q = 0.87, df = 1, p = 0.351).
“The results indicated that the between-level difference was not statistically significant for discipline (Q = 3.01, df = 9, p = 0.964), class level (Q = 0.87, df = 1, p = 0.351), and study duration (Q = 0.71, df = 1, p = 0.398), which suggested no evidence of heterogeneity across studies for these three moderators.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The meta-analysis of 53 studies covering various STEM disciplines revealed that the flipped classroom in higher education had a moderate positive effect on student performance.
“The meta-analysis of 53 studies covering various STEM disciplines revealed that the flipped classroom in higher education had a moderate positive effect on student performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When instructors were the same across both groups, the flipped classroom effect was slightly smaller (g = 0.271, k = 28).
“However, we observed a slightly smaller flipped classroom effect (g = 0.271, k = 28) when the instructors were the same across both groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In our review, video lectures as pre-class learning materials yielded a stronger effect on student performance than reading materials only.
“Our review found that the use of video lectures as pre-class learning materials yielded a stronger effect on student performance than the use of reading materials only.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In our review, flipped classroom studies using link activities had a bigger influence on student performance (g = 0.338) than those that did not (g = 0.208).
“In our review, the flipped classroom studies that used link activities (g = 0.338) had a bigger influence on student performance than those that did not (g = 0.208).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In our review, the combination of different post-class tasks (quizzes and exercises) produced a larger effect size.
“Similarly, concerning post-class activities, it was the combination of different tasks -quizzes, and exercises -which produced a larger effect size in our review.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The overall effect size remained relatively consistent (g = 0.237).
“Consequently, the overall effect size remained relatively consistent (g = 0.237).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The majority of studies in the meta-analysis (k = 46) reported using a pre-test to ensure initial equivalence between the control and experimental groups.
“The majority of studies in our meta-analysis (k = 46) reported using a pre-test to ensure initial equivalence between the control and experimental groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Studies combining individual and group activities have a higher average effect (g = 0.380) than studies using only one of these activity types.
“Concerning in-class learning activities, the results of our meta-analysis indicate that studies that combined individual activities and group activities have a higher average effect (g = 0.380) than studies that reported using only one of these activity types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
A mixture of group activities and individual activities during class improves student achievement in STEM education.
“Testing of the moderating factors link activity, pre-class activity, in-class activity, and post-class activity suggests that link activities to gauge home learning at the beginning of class, a mixture of group activities and individual activities during class and setting a combination of quizzes and exercises after class, all serve to improve student achievement in STEM education.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Setting a combination of quizzes and exercises after class improves student achievement in STEM education.
“Testing of the moderating factors link activity, pre-class activity, in-class activity, and post-class activity suggests that link activities to gauge home learning at the beginning of class, a mixture of group activities and individual activities during class and setting a combination of quizzes and exercises after class, all serve to improve student achievement in STEM education.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Link activities to gauge home learning at the beginning of class improve student achievement in STEM education.
“Testing of the moderating factors link activity, pre-class activity, in-class activity, and post-class activity suggests that link activities to gauge home learning at the beginning of class, a mixture of group activities and individual activities during class and setting a combination of quizzes and exercises after class, all serve to improve student achievement in STEM education.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In software engineering education, the MATLAB toolkit and design exercises can be better demonstrated by teachers directly in videos than through text-based materials.
“For example, in the software engineering education (Etemi & Uzunboylu, 2020), the MATLAB toolkit and design exercises can be better demonstrated by teachers directly in videos than through text-based materials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Etemi & Uzunboylu, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
The finding that effect sizes decrease with longer duration is consistent with previous meta-analyses.
“This result was consistent with the findings of previous metaanalyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationown data
Video lectures are a better form of pre-class learning materials in STEM education.
“It can be concluded that video lectures are a better form of pre-class learning materials in STEM education.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The flipped classroom allows students to study the content at their own pace.
- Rests on an assumption: With pre-recorded videos, students can pause, review, and reflect as many times as they want before class.
- Interpretationreasoning
Feedback may play a crucial role in driving the effectiveness of the flipped classroom approach.
“Given that feedback is one of the most potent factors affecting learning and achievement (Hattie & Timperley, 2007;Shute, 2008), we suggest that it may play a crucial role in driving the effectiveness of the flipped classroom approach.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Previous meta-analyses found that effects gradually decreased as durations increased.
“In meta-analyses that compared studies that were shorter and longer than a semester (Cheng et al., 2019b;Shi, Ma, et al., 2020) and compared studies that lasted 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16 weeks, and more than 16 weeks (Karagöl & Esen, 2019;Tutal & Yazar, 2021), the effects gradually decreased as the durations increased.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
These assessments are often followed by feedback from instructors during class.
“These assessments are often followed by feedback from instructors during class (Ng, 2023;Sezer & Esenay, 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ng, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Sezer & Esenay, 2022 source
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
- May combine two claims. 24
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationOnly peer-reviewed journal studies were included, as their results are believed to be of sufficient quality.
“Only peer-reviewed journal studies were included, as their results are believed to be of sufficient quality (Cheng et al., 2019a;Hew & Lo, 2018a;Korpershoek et al., 2016;Lo et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPrevious reviews found small effect sizes under a random effects model across engineering, mathematics, and health profession education.
“According to some previous reviews (Chen et al., 2018;Hew & Lo, 2018a;Lo et al., 2017), the effect sizes were small under a random effect sizes model across three disciplines (engineering, mathematics, and health profession education).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2018 source
The Methods (Data synthesis; page unavailable) say the review pooled effect sizes using a random-effects model. The Results (Main and subgroup meta-analyses; page unavailable) report effects for health-science education, including an examination-score effect of 0.53 in medical education, but do not establish that the effects were uniformly small. This source does not separately report findings for engineering or mathematics; the other citations may address those disciplines. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Hew & Lo, 2018a source
- cites Lo et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHew & Lo (2018a) found that using quizzes at the start of face-to-face courses can help students recall knowledge, identify misconceptions, and improve learning outcomes.
“(Hew & Lo, 2018a) found in their meta-analysis that using quizzes at the start of face-to-face courses can help students recall knowledge and identify possible misconceptions and so improve learning outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Hew & Lo, 2018a source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost studies in the meta-analysis were conducted within 8 weeks; one lasted half a semester and two lasted only a few days.
“Most of the studies in our meta-analysis were conducted within 8 weeks (Cabi & Emine, 2018;Karabatak & Polat, 2020;Meng et al., 2022;Muzyk et al., 2015;Senousy et al., 2017;Wang et al., 2022;Wilson & Hobbs, 2023), and one studies lasted for half a semester (Chien & Hsieh, 2018) and two studies only lasted for a few days (Arya et al., 2020;Casselman et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPublication bias tests showed symmetry: Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation z = 0.74, one-tailed p = 0.4615; Egger's linear regression t = 0.62, one-tailed p = 0.5350; and fail-safe N = 1034 additional missing studies with zero mean effect size would be required to make the overall effect statistically insignificant.
“We conducted two statistical analyses which supported the presence of symmetry: the Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation test (z = 0.74, one-tailed p = 0.4615); and Egger's Linear regression test (t = 0.62, one-tailed p = 0.5350).Both tests indicated that publication bias was not significant.We also conducted a classic fail-safe N test which showed that 1034 additional missing studies with zero mean”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataFlipped classroom courses lasting less than a semester produced better student performance (g = 0.343) than courses lasting a semester or more (g = 0.242), and effect sizes were smaller in studies with longer durations than shorter durations.
“We found that where flipped classroom courses lasted less than a semester, the students performed better (g = 0.343) than those in flipped classroom courses extending for a semester or more (g = 0.242).”
- Also stated in: § 4.1. Flipped classroom promotes student achievement · plain
“However, it was observed that the effect sizes of the flipped classroom intervention were smaller in studies with longer durations than those with shorter durations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 4.1. Flipped classroom promotes student achievement · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe flipped classroom effect was stronger when students were engaged in both group activities and individual tasks (g = 0.380) than when they participated only in group activities (g = 0.115) or only in individual tasks (g = 0.278).
“The flipped classroom effect was stronger when students were engaged in both group activities and individual tasks (g = 0.380), compared to when they participated only in group activities (g = 0.115) or only in individual tasks (g = 0.278).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor both shorter and longer durations of study intervention, students in the flipped classroom demonstrated a significant performance advantage over those in the traditional classroom.
“For both shorter and longer durations of study intervention, students in the flipped classroom demonstrated a significant performance advantage over those in the traditional classroom.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe meta-analysis found no evidence of publication bias; the overall mean effect size was not inflated by publication bias.
“with no evidence of publication bias.”
- Also stated in: § 3.4. Analysis of publication bias · boosted
“Based on the visual inspection of the funnel plot, the statistical analyses, and the fail-safe N test, it can be concluded that the overall mean effect size was not inflated by publication bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 3.4. Analysis of publication bias · boosted
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor studies with a duration of less than a semester, the flipped classroom had a slightly stronger effect (g = 0.343), and students in the flipped classroom significantly outperformed those in the traditional classroom.
“The study duration of less than a semester (k = 13) had a slightly stronger effect size (g = 0.343).When the study duration for flipped classrooms was less than a semester, students in the flipped classroom condition significantly outperformed students in the traditional classroom.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe flipped classroom had a moderate effect on student performance when students engaged in either exercises (g = 0.220) or quizzes (g = 0.275) after class.
“The flipped classroom had a moderate effect on student performance when students engaged in either exercises or quizzes after class (g = 0.220, g = 0.275).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe flipped classroom had a weak effect on student performance when the instructor was the same between the two models (g = 0.227) or when this information was not reported (g = 0.270).
“The flipped classroom had a weak effect on student performance where the instructor was the same between the two models (g = 0.227) or where this information was not reported (g = 0.270).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataStudies using different instructors across traditional and flipped classroom conditions yielded a moderate effect size (g = 0.471), based on only three studies.
“Studies using different instructors across the traditional and flipped classroom conditions yielded a moderate effect size (g = 0.471), although this result was based on only three studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOur results were inconsistent with previous findings, with the effect size of 0.316 for mathematics being the largest of the disciplines analyzed.
“Our results were inconsistent with these findings, with the effect size of 0.316 for mathematics being the largest of the disciplines analyzed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was statistically significant and moderate heterogeneity among the 53 included studies (Q = 108.68, df = 52, p = 0.0001; I2 = 52.2%).
“The heterogeneity analyses showed statistically significant variation among the 53 studies (Q = 108.68,df = 52, p = 0.0001), and the level of observed heterogeneity was moderate (I 2 = 52.2%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data28 of the studies included in the meta-analysis were published after 2020, and only two of them considered the influence of Covid-19 on the delivery mode of in-class activities.
“It is also noticeable that even though 28 of the studies included in our meta-analysis were published after 2020, only two of them considered the influence of Covid-19 on the delivery mode of in-class activities (Ng, 2023;Sezer & Esenay, 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ng, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Sezer & Esenay, 2022 source
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationcitationAn effect size of 0.26 is comparable to student-focused interventions and instructional strategies such as individualized instruction, matching style of learning, student-centered teaching, collaborative learning, discovery-based learning, and adjunct aids, and is significantly larger than effect sizes due to feedback strategies and technology approaches such as one-on-one laptops and web-based学习.
“According to analysis standards for influences on student outcomes (Hattie, 2017), an effect size of 0.26 is comparable to those associated with student-focused interventions such as individualized instruction, matching style of learning, and student-centered teaching, as well as those associated with instructional strategies such as collaborative learning, discovery-based learning, and adjunct ai”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hattie, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIf STEM teaching and learning were not already well structured and scaffolded, the added value of the flipped classroom might be more significant.
“If this were not the case, the added value of the flipped classroom might be more significant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe literature selection process followed the PRISMA Statement.
“The literature selection process followed the Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Statement (Moher et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Moher et al., 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn STEM courses, the flipped classroom's advantages may translate to only modest impacts on student performance partly because teaching and learning is already well structured and incorporates scaffolding for students.
“It is possible that in STEM courses the advantages of the flipped classroom approach translate to only modest impacts on student performance partly because the teaching and learning is already well structured and incorporates scaffolding for students.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: STEM teaching and learning is already well structured and incorporates scaffolding for students.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe review used standard tests to identify publication bias: funnel plot assessment, Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation, Egger's linear regression, and classic fail-safe N.
“Therefore, the following standard tests were used to identify whether the present review suffered from publication bias, including: 1) assessing the funnel plot (J.Light & B. Pillemer, 1986); 2) computing the Begg & Mazumdar rank correlation (Begg & Mazumdar, 1994); 3) calculating Egger's linear regression (Egger et al., 1997); 4) conducting the classic fail-safe N test (Rosenthal, 1979).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe flipped classroom promotes student achievement in STEM education, with students in flipped classrooms outperforming those in traditional classrooms by 0.26 standard deviations.
“Overall, we found a small positive effect (g = 0.26) of the flipped classroom on assessed student learning outcomes.In other words, students in the flipped classroom outperformed their counterparts in the traditional classroom by 0.26 standard deviations.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“It showed an overall significant effect in favor of flipped learning over traditional learning models for STEM education”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenTwo authors independently extracted the data, and discrepancies were reviewed, discussed, and resolved.
“Two authors independently extracted the data, and any discrepancies between their extracted data were reviewed, discussed, and resolved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe articles in this review only covered a few subsets of STEM disciplines, and it is not clear whether the conclusions can be applied to all STEM education contexts.
“Second, although we searched for publications across different databases, the articles in this review only covered a few subsets of STEM disciplines, and it is not clear whether the conclusions can be applied to all STEM education contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe difference in effect when instructors were the same might be attributed to instructors applying flipped classroom skills, such as motivating students towards active learning, even in the traditional classroom, which could moderate the effects.
“This difference might be attributed to the instructors applying the skills utilized in the flipped classroom approach, such as motivating students towards more active learning, even within the traditional classroom setting, which could moderate the effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe impact of potential language bias was not taken into consideration.
“The impact of potential language bias was not taken into consideration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMurphy et al. found that the combined post-class approach was an effective way for students to reflect on knowledge learned in class and to help instructors evaluate student learning performance and reflect on the flipped classroom model as a whole.
“The researchers found that this combined approach to post-class activity was an effective way for students to reflect on knowledge learned in class and to help instructors evaluate student learning performance and reflect on the flipped classroom model as a whole.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Murphy et al., 2016 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationEducational goals extend to areas including ethics, lifelong career orientation, civic engagement, and communication.
“They extend to areas including ethics, lifelong career orientation, civic engagement, and communication (National Academies of Sciences & Medicine, 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites National Academies of Sciences & Medicine, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationFeedback is one of the most potent factors affecting learning and achievement.
“Given that feedback is one of the most potent factors affecting learning and achievement (Hattie & Timperley, 2007;Shute, 2008), we suggest that it may play a crucial role in driving the effectiveness of the flipped classroom approach.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThis result is consistent with Lo & Hew (2019), which found that the combination of individual tasks and small-group activities produced a larger effect size.
“This result is consistent with the study by (Lo & Hew, 2019) which also found that the combination of individual tasks and small-group activities produced a larger effect size.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lo & Hew, 2019 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe selection of reviewed articles was limited to those published in English.
“Although the reviewed articles are from across different continents, the selection was limited to those published in English.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCombining group activities and individual tasks during class and providing quizzes and exercises after class are beneficial components that can improve student achievement in STEM education.
“Combining group activities and individual tasks during class and providing quizzes and exercises after class are beneficial components that can improve student achievement in STEM education, offering promising directions for the future implementation of flipped classroom courses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningStudents can acquire a deeper understanding of the subject through arguing, collaborating, and knowledge sharing during group activities, which can also enhance their learning when they study individually.
“It may be that students can acquire a deeper understanding of the subject through arguing, collaborating, and knowledge sharing during group activities, which can also enhance their learning when they study individually.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe results of the moderator analysis imply that the flipped classroom can significantly improve students' academic performance in engineering, mathematics, and health profession education.
“The results of the moderator analysis imply that the flipped classroom can significantly improve students' academic performance in the fields of engineering, mathematics, and health profession education.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThis finding aligns with Murphy et al. (2016), who required students to do online quizzes and hand in assigned homework problems from the textbook.
“This finding aligns with a study by (Murphy et al., 2016) who required students to do online quizzes and hand in assigned homework problems from the textbook.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Murphy et al., 2016 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe effect may be due to interactions among students during small-group activities, which can have additional cognitive benefits for individual learning performance.
“The effect may be due to interactions among students during small-group activities which can have additional cognitive benefits for their individual learning performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenDescriptions of interventions and course designs in the reviewed articles varied in quality and completeness, making them difficult to code accurately.
“First, the descriptions of the interventions and course designs in the reviewed articles varied in quality and completeness, making them difficult to code accurately.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenMany articles only mentioned small group activities or collaborative team-based learning but did not specify how the activities were organized and how long they lasted.
“Many articles only mentioned the use of small group activities or collaborative team-based learning but did not specify how the activities were organized and how long they lasted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEducational goals encompass more than academic attainment.
“Finally, educational goals encompass more than academic attainment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites National Academies of Sciences & Medicine, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a lack of systematic and quantitative assessments of the effectiveness of the flipped classroom model on student performance.
“However, there is a lack of systematic and quantitative assessments of the effectiveness of the flipped classroom model on student performance.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The flipped classroom allows students to study the content at their own pace.
“One beneficial aspect of the flipped classroom is that it allows students to study the content at their own pace.”
The paper relies on this without support.
With pre-recorded videos, students can pause, review, and reflect as many times as they want before class.
“With pre-recorded videos, students can pause, review, and reflect as many times as they want before class.”
The paper relies on this without support.
STEM teaching and learning is already well structured and incorporates scaffolding for students.
“It is possible that in STEM courses the advantages of the flipped classroom approach translate to only modest impacts on student performance partly because the teaching and learning is already well structured and incorporates scaffolding for students.”
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentz = 7.03reported p < .0001 · recomputed p < .001
“Z = 7.03, p < .0001”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Conclusion names the wrong disciplines with significant effects
MajorThe conclusion identifies engineering, mathematics, and health profession education as fields with significant improvement. The results instead identify mathematics, medical science, and technology as the only three disciplines with significant effects.
“The results of the moderator analysis imply that the flipped classroom can significantly improve students' academic performance in the fields of engineering, mathematics, and health profession education.”
“There were only three significant effects: mathematics (g = 0.316), medical science (g = 0.273), and technology (g = 0.210).”
Abstract claims an association with research control methods
MajorThe abstract says student performance was associated with research control methods, but the reported tests found no effect-size difference for either control-level moderator.
“Moderator analysis showed that student performance was associated with the implementation strategies of flipped learning and the research control methods.”
“Both group equivalence (Q = 4.36, df = 2, p = 0.1130) and instructor equivalence (Q = 5.30, df = 2, p = 0.0705) did not result in any difference in the effect sizes.”
Link-activity effect sizes disagree with Table 7
MinorThe prose gives g = 0.233 with a link activity and g = 0.108 without one. Table 7 reports g = 0.338 and g = 0.208, respectively; the prose values appear to come from the table's confidence-interval limits.
“As shown in Table 7, the flipped classroom effect was slightly stronger when the study used a link activity (pre-class quiz or questionnaire) (g = 0.233), compared to when the study used no link activity (g = 0.108).”
“Yes 20 0,338 0,233 0,443 0,157 36,26 47,60% No 30 0,208 0,108 0,307 0,202 68,76 53,50%”
Same-instructor effect size differs from Table 6
MinorThe discussion reports g = 0.271 for the 28 same-instructor studies, whereas Table 6 reports g = 0.227 for those studies.
“However, we observed a slightly smaller flipped classroom effect (g = 0.271, k = 28) when the instructors were the same across both groups.”
“equal 28 0,227 0,116 0,338 0,222 65,53 58,80%”
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042 · see citing works
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139 · see citing works
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722 · see citing works
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552 · see citing works
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955 · see citing works
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225 · see citing works
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · see citing works
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111 · Cited by 9,787 · see citing works
(2000) · Cited by 9,198 · see citing works
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…from publication bias, including: (1) assessing the funnel plot (Light & Pillemer, 1986); (2) computing the Begg & Mazumdar rank correlation (Begg & Mazumdar, 1994); (3) calculating Egger’s linear regression (Egger et al., 1997); (4) conducting the classic fail-safe N test (Rosenthal, 1979).”
A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.12 · Cited by 6,793 · see citing works
Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect Size and Related Estimators
Hedges, L. V. (1981) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164588 · Cited by 5,695 · see citing works
Shute, V. J. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307313795 · Cited by 4,631 · see citing works
Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment
Lage, M., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000) · The Journal of Economic Education · doi:10.1080/00220480009596759 · Cited by 2,735 · see citing works
The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x · Cited by 2,037 · see citing works
The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811311500307 · Cited by 1,638 · see citing works
Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis
HEW, K. F., & LO, C. K. (2018) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z · Cited by 1,207 · see citing works
STATISTICAL ISSUES IN ECOLOGICAL META-ANALYSES
Gurevitch, J., & Hedges, L. V. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1142:siiema]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,084 · see citing works
Estimation of effect size from a series of independent experiments.
Hedges, L. V. (1982) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.490 · Cited by 1,065 · see citing works
Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000) · The Journal of Economic Education · doi:10.2307/1183338 · Cited by 771 · see citing works
Müller, C., & Mildenberger, T. (2021) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394 · Cited by 654 · see citing works
Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis
van Alten, D. C. D., Phielix, C., Janssen, J. J. H. M., & Kester, L. (2019) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003 · Cited by 635 · see citing works
Korpershoek, H., Harms, T., de Boer, H., van Kuijk, M., & Doolaard, S. (2016) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654315626799 · Cited by 633 · see citing works
Emerging Practice and Research in Blended Learning
Graham, C. R. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203803738.ch21 · Cited by 598 · see citing works
A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education
Karabulut‐Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N., & Jahren, C. T. (2018) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12548 · Cited by 581 · see citing works
Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic review of journal publications
Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Handbook of Distance Education
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203803738 · Cited by 576 · see citing works
How Methodological Features Affect Effect Sizes in Education
Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2016) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x16656615 · Cited by 529 · see citing works
Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
Blended learning: A dangerous idea?
Moskal, P. D., Dziuban, C. D., & Hartman, J. (2012) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.001 · Cited by 496 · see citing works
Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P. (2019) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Chen, G. (2017) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.002 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Chen (2018) · doi:10.1111/medu.13616 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Låg, T., & Sæle, R. G. (2019) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/2332858419870489 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Hew, K. F., Jia, C., Gonda, D. E., & Bai, S. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-020-00234-x · Cited by 281 · see citing works
González‐Gómez, D., Jeong, J. S., Airado‐Rodríguez, D., & Cañada, F. C. (2016) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-016-9605-9 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
To Flip or Not to Flip? A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Flipped Learning in Higher Education
Bredow, C. A., Roehling, P. V., Knorp, A. J., & Sweet, A. M. (2021) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543211019122 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Investigating Strategies for Pre-Class Content Learning in a Flipped Classroom
Jensen, J. L., Holt, E. A., Sowards, J. B., Ogden, T. H., & West, R. E. (2018) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-018-9740-6 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
The Impact of the Flipped Classroom Model on Students' Academic Achievement
Cabı, E. (2018) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3482 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Shi, Y., Ma, Y., MacLeod, J., & Yang, H. H. (2019) · Journal of Computers in Education · doi:10.1007/s40692-019-00142-8 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2019) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20293 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Blended learning models for introductory programming courses: A systematic review
Alammary, A. S. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221765 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
The flipped classroom in second language learning: A meta-analysis
Vitta, J. P., & Al‐Hoorie, A. H. (2020) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168820981403 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Lin, Y.-T. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.036 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
The effects of using mobile devices on language learning: a meta-analysis
Chen, Z., Chen, W., Jia, J., & An, H. (2020) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09801-5 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Pharmacy Students’ Performance and Perceptions in a Flipped Teaching Pilot on Cardiac Arrhythmias
Wong, T. H., Ip, E. J., Lopes, I., et al. (2014) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe7810185 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
The flipped classroom: now or never?
Hawks, S. J. (2014) · PubMed · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Hu, R., Gao, H., Ye, Y., Ni, Z., Jiang, N., & Jiang, X. (2017) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.11.012 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Influences on the Development of Academic Self-Regulatory Processes
Wigfield, A., Klauda, S. L., & Cambria, J. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203839010.ch3 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Xu, P., Chen, Y., Nie, W., Wang, Y., Song, T., Li, H., Li, J., Yi, J., & Zhao, L. (2019) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2019.06.005 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Fleagle, T. R., Borcherding, N. C., Harris, J., & Hoffmann, D. S. (2017) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1755 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Meta-analyses of flipped classroom studies: A review of methodology
Hew, K. F., Bai, S., Dawson, P., & Lo, C. K. (2021) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100393 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Alt, D. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104806 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
(2008) · Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Student performance and attitudes in a collaborative and flipped linear algebra course
Murphy, J., Chang, J.-M., & Suaray, K. (2016) · International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/0020739x.2015.1102979 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Rahman, T., & Lewis, S. E. (2019) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21610 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
The Effect of Flipped Learning Approach on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study
Karagöl, İ., & Esen, E. (2018) · Hacettepe University Journal of Education · doi:10.16986/huje.2018046755 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Flipped classroom improves nursing students’ theoretical learning in China: A meta-analysis
Li, B., Cao, N., Ren, C.-X., Chu, X., Zhou, H., & Guo, B. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237926 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Seeing Change in Time: Video Games to Teach about Temporal Change in Scientific Phenomena
Corredor, J., Gaydos, M., & Squire, K. (2014) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-013-9466-4 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Effectiveness of flipped classroom vs traditional lectures in radiology education
Ge, L., Chen, Y., Yan, C., et al. (2020) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000022430 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Shi, Y., Yang, H., MacLeod, J., Zhang, J., & Yang, H. H. (2020) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633119881477 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Supporting Students' College Success
Board on Testing and Assessment, Education, D. O. B. A. S. S. A., & National Academies of Sciences, E. (2017) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/24697 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Karabatak, S., & Polat, H. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-019-09985-1 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Casselman, M. D., Atit, K., Henbest, G., Guregyan, C., Mortezaei, K., & Eichler, J. F. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00767 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Tutal, Ö., & Yazar, T. (2021) · Asia Pacific Education Review · doi:10.1007/s12564-021-09706-9 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Flipped classroom—comparative case study in engineering higher education
Castedo, R., López, L. M., Chiquito, M., Navarro, J. G., Cabrera, J., & Ortega, M. F. (2018) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22069 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Flipped classroom in engineering: The influence of gender
Chiquito, M., Castedo, R., Santos, A. P., López, L. M., & Alarcón, C. (2019) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22176 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
The Testing Effect for Learning Principles and Procedures from Texts
Dirkx, K., Liesbeth Kester, A., & Kirschner, P. A. (2014) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2013.823370 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Wang, A., Xiao, R., Zhang, C., Yuan, L., Lin, N., Yan, L., Wang, Y., Yu, J., Huang, Q., Gan, P., et al. (2022) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03538-w · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Social sciences suffer from severe publication bias
Peplow, M. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature.2014.15787 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Textbooks and Teaching: A Lesson from Students
Besser, D., Stone, G. C., & Nan, L. (1998) · Journalism & Mass Communication Educator · doi:10.1177/107769589805300401 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Nagendrababu, V., Pulikkotil, S. J., Sultan, O. S., Jayaraman, J., Soh, J. A., & Dummer, P. M. H. (2018) · International Endodontic Journal · doi:10.1111/iej.12995 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Effects of board game play on nursing students’ medication knowledge: A randomized controlled trial
Chang, Y.-S., Sophia Huey-Lan, H. U., Kuo, S.-W., Chang, K.-M., Kuo, C., Nguyen, T. V., & Chuang, Y. (2022) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103412 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Impact of flipped classroom approach on undergraduate nursing student's critical thinking skills
Sezer, T. A., & Esenay, F. I. (2022) · Journal of Professional Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.07.002 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Paul, A. M., Leung, D. G., Salas, R. M. E., Cruz, T. E., Abras, C. N., Saylor, D. R., Gugliucciello, V., Nunn, J., Gamaldo, C. E., & Strowd, R. E., III (2022) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.1080/10872981.2022.2142358 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
An Experiment in “Flipped” Teaching in Freshman Calculus
Anderson, L. K., & Brennan, J. P. (2015) · PRIMUS · doi:10.1080/10511970.2015.1059916 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Zhong, J., Li, Z., Hu, X., et al. (2022) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03740-w · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Meng, X.-H., Xu, X.-Y., Chen, H.-L., & Zhang, L. (2022) · Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00062.2020 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Muzyk, A. J., Fuller, S. H., Jiroutek, M. R., Grochowski, C. O., Butler, A. C., & May, D. B. (2015) · Pharmacy Education · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Chien, C.-F., & Hsieh, L. C. (2018) · International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design · doi:10.4018/ijopcd.2018100102 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Innovative use of a flipped-classroom approach to teach fundamental nursing skills
Wilson, K. E., & Hobbs, J. R. (2022) · Teaching and learning in nursing · doi:10.1016/j.teln.2022.08.002 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
El-Senousy, H. A. S., & Alquda, J. (2017) · World Journal on Educational Technology Current Issues · doi:10.18844/wjet.v6i3.1974 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
J. Light, R., & B. Pillemer, D. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015008016 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Ng, E. K. L. (2023) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103567 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
A META-ANALYSIS ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FLIPPED CLASSROOM IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION
Algarni, B. (2018) · EDULEARN proceedings · doi:10.21125/edulearn.2018.1852 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Flipped classroom versus traditional lecture in training undergraduates in pediatric epilepsy
Arya, V., Gehlawat, V. K., Rana, R., et al. (2020) · Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care · doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_816_20 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Comparison of Flipped Model to Traditional Classroom Learning in a Professional Pharmacy Course
McCabe, C., Smith, M. G., & Ferreri, S. P. (2017) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci7030073 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Wıdodo, W. (2022) · Journal of Science Learning · doi:10.17509/jsl.v5i3.43107 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Hew, K. F., Bai, S., Huang, W., Du, J., Huang, G., Jia, C., & Khongjan, T. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-51968-1_22 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
New innovations and educational process in undergraduate neurology education in blended learning
Mu, S., Hu, J., Liu, F., Zhao, C., & Sun, Y. (2023) · Postgraduate Medicine · doi:10.1080/00325481.2023.2234273 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
A review of the literature on flipping the STEM classroom
Huber, E., & Werner, A. (2016) · ASCILITE Publications · doi:10.14742/apubs.2016.857 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flipped Learning Research Trends in English as a Foreign Language Classrooms: Systematic Reviews
Altun, H. K., & Lee, J. (2020) · doi:10.34226/gcl.2020.10.3.109 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P. (2019b). Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 793–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7 · DOI · Paper page
- DeSantis, J., Van Curen, R., Putsch, J., & Metzger, J. (2015). Do students learn more from a flip? An exploration of the efficacy of flipped and traditional lessons. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 26(1), 39–63.
- Etemi, B. P., & Uzunboylu, H. (2020). The effects of flipped learning method on students’ perception and learning of java programming. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(4), 1372–1382.
- Hattie, J. (2017). Visible learning plus: 250+ Influences on student achievement. Visible learning plus.
- Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2018b). Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: A meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z · DOI · Paper page
- Låg, T., & Sæle, R. G. (2019). Does the flipped classroom improve student learning and satisfaction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aera Open, 5(3), 1–17. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A meta-analysis of AI-enabled personalized STEM education in schools
Li, S., Zeng, C., Liu, H., Jia, J., Liang, M., Cha, Y., Lim, C. P., & Wu, X. (2025) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-025-00566-y · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“…traditional personalized learning approaches, such as flipped classrooms and differentiated instruction, can be effective in small-scale settings (Gong et al., 2024), they are often impractical in large-scale educational and self-directed learning contexts, particularly in settings with limited…”
Integrating learning theories and innovative pedagogies in STEM education: A comprehensive review
Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. Τ. (2025) · Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education · doi:10.30935/ejsee/16538 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Flipped learning: facilitating student engagement through repeated instruction and direct feedback
Masruddin, M., Hartina, S., Arifin, M. A., & Langaji, A. (2024) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2024.2412500 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“All the academic work conducted over the years has shown that flipped learning has a positive effect on students ’ learning outcomes, success, and/or academic achievement (Aybirdi et al., 2023; Gong et al., 2024).”
Fitrah, M., Sofroniou, A., Setiawan, C., Widihastuti, W., Yarmanetti, N., Jaya, M. P. S., Panuntun, J. G., Arfaton, A., Beteno, S., & Susianti, I. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15040448 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Dai, W.-A., & Kang, Q. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-87450-5 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Curriculums development for interdisciplinary STEM education: A review of models and approaches
Joseph, O. B., & Uzondu, N. C. (2024) · International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences · doi:10.51594/ijarss.v6i8.1371 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Wang, X.-M., Wang, J.-L., Xu, S.-Y., & Xu, S.-J. (2025) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-025-00554-2 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“…educational researchers and practitioners have consistently focused on finding more effective ways to enhance students’achievement and unlock their inherent potential for innovation and practical application in STEM education (Gong et al., 2024; Micari et al., 2010; Selcen Guzey et al., 2017).”
Sarı, U., Ulusoy, A., & Pektaş, H. M. (2025) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-024-10192-y · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Very few empirical studies have specifically investigated CT in the flipped classroom setting (Gong et al., 2024).”
Flipped learning in a molecular biology course: pre-service teachers’ performance and perceptions
Reinoso, R., Galindo, S., Iglesias, J. D., & Bobo‐Pinilla, J. (2024) · Journal of Turkish Science Education · doi:10.36681/tused.2024.013 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Cepeda-Argüelles, A., García-Vázquez, F., Miranda-Barreras, P. C., et al. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16010157 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Teachers’ Views on STEM Education in Bulgaria: A Qualitative Survey
Paunova-Hubenova, E., Bontchev, B., Terzieva, V. T., & Dankov, Y. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15091155 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Distributed Active Learning (DAL): An Approach to Reduce Class Size in Large Enrollment Courses
Clark, T. M., Ricciardo, R. A., & Turner, D. A. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00108 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The perceived importance of active learning techniques in online STEM courses
Wart, M. V., McIntyre, M., Zhang, J., Medina, P., Ni, A., & Njualem, L. (2025) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100309 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Combining Active Learning Methodologies in a STEM-Related Course: A Case Study
Roig, P. J., Alcaraz, S., Gilly, K., Bernad, C., & Juiz, C. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16050740 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Herrington, D. G., & Sweeder, R. D. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14020115 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Student comprehension of biochemistry in a flipped classroom format
Harris, E. N., Schroder, E. A., & Berks, T. J. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00356-z · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Others who have performed meta-studies to systematically and quantitatively assess the flipped model argue that student performance improves over the traditional lecture model in several disciplines (Gong et al., 2024; Låg & Sæle, 2019; Strelan et al., 2020; Vitta & Al-Hoorie, 2023).”
Comparative Analysis of Traditional, Flipped and Adaptive Learning Approaches in Higher Education
Benkhalifa, A., Kaneb, Y. E., & Kodad, M. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-88653-9_23 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Baylen, D. M., Marshall, G. H., & Cox, J. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-7718-5.ch002 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Ma, G. (2025) · Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1515/cjal-2025-0307 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Aquerón, J., & Nitodas, S. F. (2025) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.70130 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Results across science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines also demonstrate enhanced achievement and performance in flipped environments [11, 12].”
HOW DOES THE FLIPPED CLASSROOM MODEL AFFECT STUDENTS' MOTIVATION, PERFORMANCE AND ATTITUDE?
Yacı, Ş. N., Baran, B., & Siyez, D. M. (2024) · Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama · doi:10.17943/etku.1368027
Education of 21st century: A proposal of flipped classroom strategy to teach Soil Biology
de Araújo, A. S. F., de Medeiros, É. V., da Costa, D. P., Pereira, A. P. D. A., Mendes, L. W., & Lemos, L. N. (2024) · Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo · doi:10.36783/18069657rbcs20240062
Aras, Y. K., & Aydemir, M. (2025) · Educational Academic Research · doi:10.33418/education.1567607
WIP: Explore Before Explain: A Quantum Leap in Student Engagement in First-Year Engineering Classes
Draughon, G., Barron, M. J., Hamlin, B. H., et al. (2024) · 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie61694.2024.10893327
“It is well known that both active and flipped teaching enhance student performance [3] [4].”
Rubric-Based Evaluation Method for Reporting Seminar Classroom Teaching
王, 家. (2025) · Creative Education Studies · doi:10.12677/ces.2025.134280
Students' Perceptions of and Experience With Online Test Preparation (Rehearsal) and Testing
Liu, Y., Zhang, J., McIntyre, M. M., Seferoğlu, G., & Wart, M. V. (2025) · International Journal of Adult Education and Technology · doi:10.4018/ijaet.375385 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“This has been confirmed in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) settings as well (Feudel & Unger, 2022; Gong et al., 2024; Larsen et al., 2008; Lavallard et al., 2023; Wenger et al., 2009).”
Arıkan, K. (2025) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2025.2567512
Jones, E. M., Jack, E., & Bock, M. (2025) · Teaching Mathematics and its Applications An International Journal of the IMA · doi:10.1093/teamat/hraf018
Romero, F., Alonso-Pinto, G., Agujetas, R., & Sánchez, F. J. A. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16020350 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flipping a science education course for pre-service teachers
Aljanazrah, A., Kinnunen, J., Kontkanen, J., Asikainen, M. A., Anjass, E., & Valtonen, T. (2026) · LUMAT International Journal on Math Science and Technology Education · doi:10.31129/lumat.14.2.3062
“Out of the 53 studies analyzed by Gong et al. (2024) only 17 studies had statistically significant effect sizes in favor of the flipped classroom model, while another 27 studies showed some modest gains.”
Han, D., & Leung, M. T. C. (2025) · International Conference on Modern Educational Technology (ICMET) · doi:10.1109/icmet67594.2025.11451946
“These outcomes align with global trends in active learning [9], [10].”
Effects of flipped learning on secondary students’ chemistry achievement and attitudes
Alsalhi, N. R. (2026) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education · doi:10.29333/ejmste/18504
“Research in the domain of STEM disciplines demonstrate that FL is more effective than traditional mode of teaching for enhancing learner ’ achievement, conceptual understanding, and motivation (Gong et al., 2024; Schultz et al., 2014; Su & Chen, 2018).”
Student Perceptions of Usefulness and Ease of Use of a Gamified Learning Platform in STEM Courses
Chans, G. M., Merino‐Soto, C., Valle-Arce, A. P., et al. (2026) · doi:10.1109/edunine62390.2026.11547060
“…emotional factors is key to improving retention and academic success Active learning strategies such as problem-based learning, group collaboration, and flipped classrooms help address low engagement in STEM education by promoting participation, critical thinking, and deeper understanding [5, 6].”
Student Perceptions of Flipped Learning in STEM Courses
Gopalan, C., Selvam, A. A. A., Blake, C., et al. (2026) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/14697874261457090
Impact of flipped classrooms on higher education student outcomes: A second-order meta-analysis
Uzun, A. M., Kaya, M., Ünal, E., & Bayraktar, D. M. (2026) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101653
Su, K.-D. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-32115-2_19
Flipped classroom and learning outcomes: a second-order meta-analysis
Wang, W., Wang, Y., Mo, J., & Shen, G. (2026) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-026-10686-z
Biswas, B., Biswas, S., Jha, M., et al. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-25446-7_7
Ritchie, B., & Chen, J.-P. (2026) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--61106
Academic procrastination and assignment submission patterns in a flipped programming course
Akkurt, O., & Somyürek, S. (2026) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-026-02111-7
“While prior research has extensively explored how the flipped classroom model improves engagement and problem-solving [39], limited studies have focused on the critical role of academic [80] procrastination in this specific pedagogical context [98].”
Efektivitas model flipped classroom berbantuan video pembelajaran terhadap hasil belajar mahasiswa
Arif, A., Hakim, A., Pebrianti, F., et al. (2026) · Jurnal Sains dan Edukasi Sains · doi:10.24246/juses.v9i2p96-103
Yuen, A. C. Y., 田畅, & Mo, C. (2026) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings16204049
- Authors
- Gong, J., Cai, S., & Cheng, M.
- Affiliations
- Tongji University (CN)
- Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gong, Jin
- ORCID
- Cai, Sanfa
- Venue
- Technology, Knowledge and Learning
- Published
- 2023-11-15
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1129-1150
- ISSN
- 2211-1662 (ISSN-L)
- 2211-1670
- OpenAlex
- W4388701437
- Semantic Scholar
- 0f5318edea82d0226510cdf7669ef2d6dfa5d37b
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 9
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- orcid.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Technology Knowledge and Learning (publishedVersion)
- SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- flipped classroom, STEM education, academic performance, higher education, active learning, pre-class activities, classroom activities, implementation strategies, conventional instruction comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-26.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-26.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review