Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 79Education and Critical Thinking DevelopmentOnline and Blended LearningDigital Education and Society

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Taking critical thinking, creativity and grit online

Open access
Nussbaum, Miguel, Barahona, Camila, Rodriguez, Fernanda, Guentulle, Victoria, Lopez, Felipe, Vazquez-Uscanga, Enrique, Cabezas, Veronica·2021·Educational Technology Research and Development

Abstract

Technology has the potential to facilitate the development of higher-order thinking skills in learning. There has been a rush towards online learning by education systems during COVID-19; this can therefore be seen as an opportunity to develop students' higher-order thinking skills. In this short report we show how critical thinking and creativity can be developed in an online context, as well as highlighting the importance of grit. We also suggest the importance of heuristic evaluation in the design of online systems to support twenty-first century learning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11423-020-09867-1

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Haderer, A. M. (2020). Exploring the relationship between teacher efficacy and grit. Doctoral dissertation, Shenandoah University.
  2. OECD. (2020). A framework to guide an education response to the COVID-19 Pandemic of 2020. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=126_126988-t63lxosohs&title=A-framework-to-guide-an-education-response-to-the-Covid-19-Pandemic-of-2020

Cited by

See all 79

Metadata

Authors
Nussbaum, M., Barahona, C., Rodriguez, F., Guentulle, V., Lopez, F., Vazquez-Uscanga, E., & Cabezas, V.
Affiliations
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
Venue
Educational Technology Research and Development
Published
2020-11-09
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
201-206
ISSN
  • 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6501
OpenAlex
W3101768292
Cited by
79
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2
FWCI
19.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Educational Technology Research and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
CONICYT (FONDECYT 1180024)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Digital Education and Society
Keywords
critical thinking, creativity, grit, online learning, higher-order thinking skills, COVID-19 pandemic, heuristic evaluation, 21st century learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Taking critical thinking, creativity and grit online. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11423-020-09867-1
The paper
Nussbaum, M., Barahona, C., Rodriguez, F., Guentulle, V., Lopez, F., Vazquez-Uscanga, E., & Cabezas, V. (2021). Taking critical thinking, creativity and grit online. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09867-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.