Cited by 592biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applicationsBone Tissue Engineering Materials

Synthetic biodegradable functional polymers for tissue engineering: a brief review

Open access
Guo, BaoLin, Ma, Peter X.·2014·Science China Chemistry

Abstract

Scaffolds play a crucial role in tissue engineering. Biodegradable polymers with great processing flexibility are the predominant scaffolding materials. Synthetic biodegradable polymers with well-defined structure and without immunological concerns associated with naturally derived polymers are widely used in tissue engineering. The synthetic biodegradable polymers that are widely used in tissue engineering, including polyesters, polyanhydrides, polyphosphazenes, polyurethane, and poly (glycerol sebacate) are summarized in this article. New developments in conducting polymers, photoresponsive polymers, amino-acid-based polymers, enzymatically degradable polymers, and peptide-activated polymers are also discussed. In addition to chemical functionalization, the scaffold designs that mimic the nano and micro features of the extracellular matrix (ECM) are presented as well, and composite and nanocomposite scaffolds are also reviewed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11426-014-5086-y

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fossil-based polymers usually have a controlled structure, no immunological reaction, and a higher degree of processing flexibility.

    “They usually have a controlled structure, no immunological reaction, and a higher degree of processing flexibility. They can also provide better control over the synthesis and design of the polymer itself [11].”

    From Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [11]

    Section 2.1 says synthetic polymers usually have controlled structure, greater processing flexibility, and no immunological concerns. It does not identify them specifically as fossil-based polymers, and ‘no immunological concerns’ does not establish that they cause no immunological reaction. The paper also discusses control over polymer properties through synthesis and design, but not as a comparative advantage of fossil-based polymers. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Fossil-based polymers can provide better control over the synthesis and design of the polymer itself.

    “They usually have a controlled structure, no immunological reaction, and a higher degree of processing flexibility. They can also provide better control over the synthesis and design of the polymer itself [11].”

    From Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [11]

    Section 2.1 describes synthetic polymers as having controlled structures and explains that their composition and properties can be tuned, supporting the point about control over polymer design. It does not identify these polymers as fossil-based or establish that the advantage applies specifically to fossil-based polymers. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some synthetic biodegradable polymers have attracted considerable attention because they present high biocompatibility, ease of processing, and tailored mechanical properties and degradation rates.

    “some synthetic biodegradable polymers have attracted considerable attention over the past decades since the present high biocompatibility, ease of processing, as well as tailored mechanical properties and degradation rates [21][22][23][24][25][26]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. [1]Couch N Wtlson R Hager E Murray J Transplantatton of cadaver kidneys experience with 21 cases Surgery 1966 59 183 188 5330493
  2. [2]Langer R Vacanti JP Tissue engineering Science 1993 260 920 926 8493529
  3. [4]Ma PX Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering Adv Drug Delivery Rev 2008 60 184 198 PMC2271038 18045729
  4. [5]Liu XH Holzwarth JM Ma PX Functionalized synthetic biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering Macromol Biosci 2012 12 911 919 22396193
  5. [7]Yang SF Leong KF Du ZH Chua CK The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part 1. Traditional factors Tissue Eng 2001 7 679 689 11749726
  6. [11]Van Vlierberghe S Dubruel P Schacht E Biopolymer-based hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: a review Biomacromolecules 2011 12 1387 1408 21388145
  7. [12]Tate MLK Falls TD McBride SH Atit R Knothe UR Mechanical modulation of osteochondroprogenitor cell fate Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2008 40 2720 2738 18620888 PMC4427832
  8. [14]Cameron DJA Shaver MP Aliphatic polyester polymer stars: synthesis, properties and applications in biomedicine and nanotechnology Chem Soc Rev 2011 40 1761 1776 21082079
  9. [17]Seyednejad H Ghassemi AH van Nostrum CF Vermonden T Hennink WE Functional aliphatic polyesters for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications J Controlled Release 2011 152 168 176 21223989
  10. [20]Labet M Thielemans W Synthesis of polycaprolactone: a review Chem Soc Rev 2009 38 3484 3504 20449064
  11. [23]McNeil SE Griffiths HR Perrie Y Polycaprolactone fibres as a potential delivery system for collagen to support bone regeneration Curr Drug Deliv 2011 8 448 455 21235468
  12. [24]Torres MP Vogel BM Narasimhan B Mallapragada SK Synthesis and characterization of novel polyanhydrides with tailored erosion mechanisms J Biomed Mater Res A 2006 76A 102 110 16138330
  13. [25]Jain JP Chitkara D Kumar N Polyanhydrides as localized drug delivery carrier: an update Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2008 5 889 907 18712998
  14. [26]Jain JP Modi S Domb AJ Kumar N Role of polyanhydrides as localized drug carriers J Controlled Release 2005 103 541 563 15820403
  15. [29]Teasdale I Bruggemann O Polyphosphazenes: multifunctional, biodegradable vehicles for drug and gene delivery Polymers 2013 5 161 187 24729871 PMC3982046
  16. [30]Krogman NR Weikel AL Kristhart KA Nukavarapu SP Deng M Nair LS Laurencin CT Allcock HR The influence of side group modification in polyphosphazenes on hydrolysis and cell adhesion of blends with PLGA Biomaterials 2009 30 3035 3041 19345410 PMC2693372
  17. [34]Guelcher SA Biodegradable polyurethanes: synthesis and applications in regenerative medicine Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2008 14 3 17 18454631
  18. [35]Zhang JY Doll BA Beckman EJ Hollinger JO Three-dimensional biocompatible ascorbic acid-containing scaffold for bone tissue engineering Tissue Eng 2003 9 1143 1157 14670102
  19. [36]Rai R Tallawi M Grigore A Boccaccini AR Synthesis, properties and biomedical applications of poly(glycerol sebacate) (PGS): a review Prog Polym Sci 2012 37 1051 1078
  20. [38]Pomerantseva I Krebs N Hart A Neville CM Huang AY Sundback CA Degradation behavior of poly(glycerol sebacate) J Biomed Mater Res A 2009 91A 1038 1047 19107788
  21. [39]Patel A Gaharwar AK Iviglia G Zhang HB Mukundan S Mihaila SM Demarchi D Khademhosseini A Highly elastomeric poly (glycerol sebacate)-co-poly(ethylene glycol) amphiphilic block copolymers Biomaterials 2013 34 3970 3983 23453201 PMC4507745
  22. [40]Masoumi N Johnson KL Howell MC Engelmayr GC Valvular interstitial cell seeded poly(glycerol sebacate) scaffolds: toward a biomimetic in vitro model for heart valve tissue engineering Acta Biomater 2013 9 5974 5988 23295404
  23. [41]Ravichandran R Venugopal JR Sundarrajan S Mukherjee S Ramakrishna S Poly(glycerol sebacate)/gelatin core/shell fibrous structure for regeneration of myocardial infarction Tissue Eng Part A 2011 17 1363 1373 21247338
  24. [42]Sun ZJ Chen C Sun MZ Ai CH Lu XL Zheng YF Yang BF Dong DL The application of poly(glycerol-sebacate) as biodegradable drug carrier Biomaterials 2009 30 5209 5214 19560817
  25. [43]Slaughter BV Khurshid SS Fisher OZ Khademhosseini A Peppas NA Hydrogels in regenerative medicine Adv Mater 2009 21 3307 3329 20882499 PMC4494665
  26. [45]Peyton SR Raub CB Keschrumrus VP Putnam AJ The use of poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels to investigate the impact of ECM chemistry and mechanics on smooth muscle cells Biomaterials 2006 27 4881 4893 16762407
  27. [46]Mann BK JLW Cell adhesion peptides alter smooth muscle cell adhesion, proliferation, migration, and matrix protein synthesis on modified surfaces and in polymer scaffolds J Biomed Mater Res A 2002 60 86 93 11835163
  28. [47]Abebe DG Fujiwara T Controlled thermoresponsive hydrogels by stereocomplexed PLA-PEG-PLA prepared via hybrid micelles of pre-mixed copolymers with different PEG lengths Biomacromolecules 2012 13 1828 1836 22537225
  29. [49]Yang JY Jacobsen MT Pan HZ Kopecek J Synthesis and characterization of enzymatically degradable PEG-based peptide-containing hydrogels Macromol Biosci 2010 10 445 454 20146210 PMC4608387
  30. [50]Lutolf MP Lauer-Fields JL Schmoekel HG Metters AT Weber FE Fields GB Hubbell JA Synthetic matrix metalloproteinase-sensitive hydrogels for the conduction of tissue regeneration: engineering cell-invasion characteristics Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003 100 5413 5418 12686696 PMC154359
  31. [52]Schmidt CE Shastri VR Vacanti JP Langer R Stimulation of neurite outgrowth using an electrically conducting polymer Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997 94 8948 8953 9256415 PMC22977
  32. [53]Wong JY Langer R Ingber DE Electrical conducting polymers can nonnvasively control the shape and growth of mammalian-cells Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994 91 3201 3204 8159724 PMC43543
  33. [55]Shi GX Rouabhia M Wang ZX Dao LH Zhang Z A novel electrically conductive and biodegradable composite made of polypyrrole nanoparticles and polylactide Biomaterials 2004 25 2477 2488 14751732
  34. [56]Richardson RT Wise AK Thompson BC Flynn BO Atkinson PJ Fretwell NJ Fallon JB Wallace GG Shepherd RK Clark GM O’Leary SJ Polypyrrole-coated electrodes for the delivery of charge and neurotrophins to cochlear neurons Biomaterials 2009 30 2614 2624 19178943 PMC3563695
  35. [57]Xu H Holzwarth JM Yan Y Xu P Zheng H Yin Y Li S Ma PX Conductive PPY/PDLLA conduit for peripheral nerve regeneration Biomaterials 2014 35 225 235 24138830 PMC3884072
  36. [58]Jeong SI Jun ID Choi MJ Nho YC Lee YM Shin H Development of electroactive and elastic nanofibers that contain polyaniline and poly(L-lactide-co-epsilon-caprolactone) for the control of cell adhesion Macromol Biosci 2008 8 627 637 18401867
  37. [61]Huang LH Zhuang XL Hu J Lang L Zhang PB Wang Y Chen XS Wei Y Jing XB Synthesis of biodegradable and electroactive multiblock polylactide and aniline pentamer copolymer for tissue engineering applications Biomacromolecules 2008 9 850 858 18260636
  38. [63]Guo BL Finne-Wistrand A Albertsson AC Molecular architecture of electroactive and biodegradable copolymers composed of polylactide and carboxyl-capped aniline trimer Biomacromolecules 2010 11 855 863 20201489
  39. [69]Guo BL Finne-Wistrand A Albertsson AC Facile synthesis of degradable and electrically conductive polysaccharide hydrogels Biomacromolecules 2011 12 2601 2609 21574634
  40. [71]Guo BL Sun Y Finne-Wistrand A Mustafa K Albertsson AC Electroactive tubular porous scaffolds with degradability and non-cytotoxicity for neural tissue regeneration Acta Biomater 2012 8 144 153 21985870
  41. [76]Peng K Tomatsu I Kros A Light controlled protein release from a supramolecular hydrogel Chem Commun 2010 46 4094 4096 20464018
  42. [77]Altunbas A Pochan DJ Peptide-based and polypeptide-based hydrogels for drug delivery and tissue engineering Top Curr Chem 2012 310 135 167 21809190
  43. [79]Li LQ Charati MB Kiick KL Elastomeric polypeptide-based biomaterials Polym Chem 2010 1 1160 1170 PMC3104281 21637725
  44. [80]Kopecěk J Rejmanová P Enzymatically degradable bonds in synthetic polymers Bruck SD Controlled Drug Delivery I Boca Raton, FL CRC Press 1983 81
  45. [81]Brandl FP Seitz AK Tessmar JKV Blunk T Gopferich AM Enzymatically degradable poly(ethylene glycol) based hydrogels for adipose tissue engineering Biomaterials 2010 31 3957 3966 20170951
  46. [84]Barnes CP Sell SA Boland ED Simpson DG Bowlin GL Nano-fiber technology: designing the next generation of tissue engineering scaffolds Adv Drug Delivery Rev 2007 59 1413 1433 17916396
  47. [85]Wei GB Ma PX Partially nanofibrous architecture of 3D tissue engineering scaffolds Biomaterials 2009 30 6426 6434 19699518 PMC2763581
  48. [86]Wei GB Ma PX Nanostructured biomaterials for regeneration Adv Funct Mater 2008 18 3568 3582 PMC2701700 19946357
  49. [87]Vasita R Katti DS Nanofibers and their applications in tissue engineering Int J Nanomed 2006 1 15 30 PMC2426767 17722259
  50. [88]Wei GB Ma PX Macroporous and nanofibrous polymer scaffolds and polymer/bone-like apatite composite scaffolds generated by sugar spheres J Biomed Mater Res A 2006 78A 306 315 16637043
  51. [89]Ma PX Zhang RY Synthetic nano-scale fibrous extracellular matrix J Biomed Mater Res 1999 46 60 72 10357136
  52. [90]Chen VJ Ma PX Nano-fibrous poly(L-lactic acid) scaffolds with interconnected spherical macropores Biomaterials 2004 25 2065 2073 14741621
  53. [91]Liu XH Ma PX Phase separation, pore structure, and properties of nanofibrous gelatin scaffolds Biomaterials 2009 30 4094 4103 19481080 PMC2744837
  54. [92]Liu XH Jin XB Ma PX Nanofibrous hollow microspheres self-assembled from star-shaped polymers as injectable cell carriers for knee repair Nat Mater 2011 10 398 406 21499313 PMC3080435
  55. [93]Kang SW Yang HS Seo SW Han DK Kim BS Apatite-coated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres as an injectable scaffold for bone tissue engineering J Biomed Mater Res A 2008 85A 747 756 17896763
  56. [94]Lee TJ Kang SW Bhang SH Kang JM Kim BS Apatite-coated porous poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres as an injectable bone substitute J Biomater Sci, Polym Ed 2010 21 635 645 20338097
  57. [95]Holzwarth JM Ma PX Biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering Biomaterials 2011 32 9622 9629 21944829 PMC3195926
  58. [96]Zhang R Ma PX Poly(alpha-hydroxyl acids)/hydroxyapatite porous composites for bone tissue engineering. I. Preparation and morphology J Biomed Mater Res 1999 44 446 455 10397949
  59. [97]Boccaccini AR Blaker JJ Bioactive composite materials for tissue engineering scaffolds Expert Rev Med Devices 2005 2 303 317 16288594
  60. [98]Dorozhkin SV Nanosized and nanocrystalline calcium orthophosphates Acta Biomater 2010 6 715 734 19861183
  61. [99]Chou YF Dunn JCY Wu BM In vitro response of MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts within three-dimensional apatite-coated PLGA scaffolds J Biomed Mater Res B 2005 75B 81 90 16001421
  62. [100]Zhang RY Ma PX Porous poly(L-lactic acid)/apatite composites created by biomimetic process J Biomed Mater Res 1999 45 285 293 10321700
  63. [101]Liao S Watari F Zhu Y Uo M Akasaka T Wang W Xu G Gui F The degradation of the three layered nano-carbonated hydroxyapatite/collagen/PLGA composite membrane in vitro Dent Mater 2007 23 1120 1128 17095082
  64. [102]Ngiam M Liao SS Patil AJ Cheng ZY Chan CK Ramakrishna S The fabrication of nano-hydroxyapatite on PLGA and PLGA/collagen nanofibrous composite scaffolds and their effects in osteoblastic behavior for bone tissue engineering Bone 2009 45 4 16 19358900
  65. [103]Wei GB Ma PX Structure and properties of nano-hydroxyapatite/polymer composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering Biomaterials 2004 25 4749 4757 15120521
  66. [105]Liu X Smith LA Hu J Ma PX Biomimetic nanofibrous gelatin/apatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering Biomaterials 2009 30 2252 2258 19152974 PMC2679864
  67. [106]He CL Xiao GY Jin XB Sun CH Ma PX Electrodeposition on nanofibrous polymer scaffolds: rapid mineralization, tunable calcium phosphate composition and topography Adv Funct Mater 2010 20 3568 3576 21673827 PMC3111928
  68. [107]He C Jin X Ma PX Calcium phosphate deposition rate, structure and osteoconductivity on electrospun poly(L-lactic acid) matrix using electrodeposition or simulated body fluid incubation Acta Biomater 2014 10 419 427 24012605 PMC3840094

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, B., & Ma, P. X.
Affiliations
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Ma, Peter X.
Venue
Science China Chemistry
Published
2014-03-01
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
490-500
ISSN
  • 1001-652X (ISSN-L)
  • 1674-7291
  • 1869-1870
OpenAlex
W2252957247
Cited by
592
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 4
FWCI
11.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science China Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE017689, R01DE022327, R01DE015384)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Keywords
tissue engineering scaffolds, polyesters, polyanhydrides, polyphosphazenes, polyurethane, polyglycolic acid, conducting polymers, photoresponsive polymers, amino acid-based polymers, chemical functionalization, extracellular matrix mimicry, nanocomposite scaffolds, composite scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review