Cited by 47Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsMedical Imaging and Analysis

Automated measurement network for accurate segmentation and parameter modification in fetal head ultrasound images

Li, Peixuan, Zhao, Huaici, Liu, Pengfei, Cao, Feidao·2020·Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing

Abstract

Measurement of anatomical structures from ultrasound images requires the expertise of experienced clinicians. Moreover, there are artificial factors that make an automatic measurement complicated. In this paper, we aim to present a novel end-to-end deep learning network to automatically measure the fetal head circumference (HC), biparietal diameter (BPD), and occipitofrontal diameter (OFD) length from 2D ultrasound images. Fully convolutional neural networks (FCNNs) have shown significant improvement in natural image segmentation. Therefore, to overcome the potential difficulties in automated segmentation, we present a novelty FCNN and add a regression branch for predicting OFD and BPD in parallel. In the segmentation branch, a feature pyramid inside our network is built from low-level feature layers for a variety of fetal head in ultrasound images, which is different from traditional feature pyramid building methods. In order to select the most useful scale and reduce scale noise, attention mechanism is taken for the feature's filter. In the regression branch, for the accurate estimation of OFD and BPD length, a new region of interest (ROI) pooling layer is proposed to extract the elliptic feature map. We also evaluate the performance of our method on large dataset: HC18. Our experimental results show that our method can achieve better performance than the existing fetal head measurement methods. Graphical Abstract Deep Neural Network for Fetal Head Measurement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11517-020-02242-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 47

Authors
Li, P., Zhao, H., Liu, P., & Cao, F.
Affiliations
Shenyang Institute of Automation (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Huaici
Venue
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Published
2020-09-25
Volume
58
Issue
11
Pages
2879-2892
ISSN
  • 0140-0118 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-0444
OpenAlex
W3088355951
Cited by
47
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
fetal head measurement, fetal head circumference, biparietal diameter, occipitofrontal diameter, fetal head segmentation, ultrasound image segmentation, fully convolutional network, feature pyramid, attention mechanism
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Female, Head, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography, Prenatal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review