Automated measurement network for accurate segmentation and parameter modification in fetal head ultrasound images
Abstract
Measurement of anatomical structures from ultrasound images requires the expertise of experienced clinicians. Moreover, there are artificial factors that make an automatic measurement complicated. In this paper, we aim to present a novel end-to-end deep learning network to automatically measure the fetal head circumference (HC), biparietal diameter (BPD), and occipitofrontal diameter (OFD) length from 2D ultrasound images. Fully convolutional neural networks (FCNNs) have shown significant improvement in natural image segmentation. Therefore, to overcome the potential difficulties in automated segmentation, we present a novelty FCNN and add a regression branch for predicting OFD and BPD in parallel. In the segmentation branch, a feature pyramid inside our network is built from low-level feature layers for a variety of fetal head in ultrasound images, which is different from traditional feature pyramid building methods. In order to select the most useful scale and reduce scale noise, attention mechanism is taken for the feature's filter. In the regression branch, for the accurate estimation of OFD and BPD length, a new region of interest (ROI) pooling layer is proposed to extract the elliptic feature map. We also evaluate the performance of our method on large dataset: HC18. Our experimental results show that our method can achieve better performance than the existing fetal head measurement methods. Graphical Abstract Deep Neural Network for Fetal Head Measurement.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Five studies used the freely available 'HC18' data set for training and testing algorithms, which contained 1334 2D images from 551 women of the standard fetal head plane.
“Five studies used the freely available ‘HC18’ data set [45] for training and testing the algorithms, which contained 1334 2D images from 551 women of the standard fetal head plane [18,34,37,38,40].”
AI models designed for automatic biometric measurements are usually restricted to a specific range of GA and can fail in images of different GA.
“AI models designed for automatic biometric measurements are usually restraint to a specific range of GA and can fail in images of different GA [34,40,78].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- Li, P., Zhao, H., Liu, P., & Cao, F.
- Affiliations
- Shenyang Institute of Automation (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhao, Huaici
- Venue
- Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
- Published
- 2020-09-25
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2879-2892
- ISSN
- 0140-0118 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-0444
- OpenAlex
- W3088355951
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 2.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
- Keywords
- fetal head measurement, fetal head circumference, biparietal diameter, occipitofrontal diameter, fetal head segmentation, ultrasound image segmentation, fully convolutional network, feature pyramid, attention mechanism
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Female, Head, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography, Prenatal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review