Cited by 144Homelessness and Social IssuesUrban and Rural Development ChallengesFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Health Status, Quality of Life, Residential Stability, Substance Use, and Health Care Utilization among Adults Applying to a Supportive Housing Program

Open access

Abstract

Supportive housing, defined as subsidized housing in conjunction with site-based social services, may help improve the health and residential stability of highly disadvantaged individuals. This study examined changes in health status, quality of life, substance use, health care utilization, and residential stability among 112 homeless and vulnerably housed individuals who applied to a supportive housing program in Toronto, Canada, from December 2005 to June 2007. Follow-up interviews were conducted every 6 months for 18 months. Comparisons were made between individuals who were accepted into the program (intervention) and those who were wait-listed (usual care) using repeated-measures analyses. Individuals who were accepted into the housing program experienced significantly greater improvements in satisfaction with living situation compared with individuals in the usual care group (time, F(3,3,261) = 47.68, p < 0.01; group × time, F(3,3,261) = 14.60, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in other quality of life measures, health status, health care utilization, or substance use between the two groups over time. Significant improvement in residential stability occurred over time, independent of assigned housing group (time, F(3,3,261) = 9.96, p < 0.01; group × time, F(3,3,261) = 1.74, p = 0.17). The ability to examine the effects of supportive housing on homeless individuals was limited by the small number of participants who were literally homeless at baseline and by the large number of participants who gained stable housing during the study period regardless of their assigned housing status. Nonetheless, this study shows that highly disadvantaged individuals with a high prevalence of poor physical and mental health and substance use can achieve stable housing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11524-011-9592-3

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Goering P, Boydell K, Butterill D, et al. Review of Best Practices in Mental Health Reform. Ottawa, ON: Health Canada; 1997.
  2. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller D. SF-12: How to Score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1995.
  3. Detailed review of the drug abuse screening test (DAST). In: Directory of Client Outcome Measures for Addiction Treatment Programs. Ontario, Canada: Addiction Research Foundation; 1993.
  4. Kee R, Sadowski L, Buchanan D, Garcia D. Validity of Self-Reported Health Service Utilization Data in the Homeless. 135th APHA Annual Meeting & Exposition; November 3–7, 2007; Washington, DC. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 2007.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–144 of 144

Metadata

Authors
Hwang, S. W., Gogosis, E., Chambers, C., Dunn, J. R., Hoch, J. S., & Aubry, T.
Affiliations
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Hwang, Stephen W.
Venue
Journal of Urban Health
Published
2011-06-03
Volume
88
Issue
6
Pages
1076-1090
ISSN
  • 0028-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-3460
  • 1468-2869
OpenAlex
W2032315396
Cited by
144
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
11.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Urban Health (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Keywords
supported housing, homelessness, residential stability, quality of life, health status, substance use, health care utilization, subsidized housing, mental health, physical health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alcoholism, Canada, Educational Status, Female, Health Services, Health Status, Ill-Housed Persons, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Public Housing, Quality of Life, Social Work, Substance-Related Disorders, Racial Groups, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review