Cited by 515Homelessness and Social IssuesUrban and Rural Development ChallengesPsychiatric care and mental health services

Public service reductions associated with placement of homeless persons with severe mental illness in supportive housing

Open access
Culhane, Dennis P., Metraux, Stephen, Hadley, Trevor·2002·Housing Policy Debate

Abstract

This article assesses the impact of public investment in supportive housing for homeless persons with severe mental disabilities. Data on 4,679 people placed in such housing in New York City between 1989 and 1997 were merged with data on the utilization of public shelters, public and private hospitals, and correctional facilities. A series of matched controls who were homeless but not placed in housing were similarly tracked. Regression results reveal that persons placed in supportive housing experience marked reductions in shelter use, hospitalizations, length of stay per hospitalization, and time incarcerated. Before placement, homeless people with severe mental illness used about $40,451 per person per year in services (1999 dollars). Placement was associated with a reduction in services use of $16,281 per housing unit per year. Annual unit costs are estimated at $17,277, for a net cost of $995 per unit per year over the first two years.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10511482.2002.9521437

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Supportive housing initiatives specific to people leaving prison have been shown to be effective in reducing reincarceration.

    “Supportive housing initiatives specific to people leaving prison have been shown to be effective in reducing reincarceration (14).”

    From Behavioral Health and Social Correlates of Reincarceration Among Hispanic, Native American, and White Rural Women (2013) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Outpatient services section reports fewer people jailed and fewer incarceration days after supportive-housing placement. But the initiative studied housed homeless people with severe mental illness, not specifically people leaving prison; the reported outcome is incarceration after placement, not a measured reincarceration rate for prison leavers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Burt, Martha R., Laudan Y. Aron, and Edgar Lee. 2001. Helping America's Homeless: Emergency Shelter or Affordable Housing? Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
  2. Carling, Paul J. 1993. Housing and Supports for Persons with Mental Illness: Emerging Approaches to Research and Practice. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 44(5): 439-49.
  3. Dickey, Barbara, Olinda Gonzalez, Eric Latimer, Karen Powers, Russell K. Schutt, and Stephen M. Goldfinger. 1996. Use of Mental Health Services by Formerly Homeless Adults Residing in Group and Independent Housing. Psychiatric Services 47(2):152-58.
  4. Drake, Robert E., Nancy A. Yovetich, Richard R. Bebout, Maxine Harris, and Gregory J. McHugo. 1997. Integrated Treatment for Dually Diagnosed Homeless Adults. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 185(5):298-305.
  5. Hevesi, Dennis. 1999. Building Homes for the Single Homeless. New York Times, April 28, Sec. 11, p. 1. Hurlburt, Michael S., Patricia A. Wood, and Richard L. Hough. 1996. Providing Inde- pendent Housing for the Mentally Ill Homeless: A Novel Approach to Evaluating Long- Term Housing Patterns. Journal of Community Psychology 24:291-310.
  6. Kuhn, Randall S., and Dennis P. Culhane. 1998. Applying Cluster Analysis to Test a Typology of Homelessness by Pattern of Shelter Utilization: Results from the Analysis of Administrative Data. American Journal of Community Psychology 26(2):207-32.
  7. Lipton, Frank R., Carol Siegel, Anthony Hannigan, Judith Samuels, and Sherryl Baker. 2000. Tenure in Supportive Housing for Homeless Persons with Severe Mental Illness. Psychiatric Services 51(4):479-86.
  8. Murray, Ruth, Marjorie Baier, Carol North, Mary Lato, and Cary Eskew. 1997. One-Year Status of Homeless Mentally Ill Clients Who Completed a Transitional Residential Pro- gram. Community Mental Health Journal 33(1):43-50.
  9. Pollio, David E., Edward L. Spitznagel, Carol S. North, Sanna Thompson, and Douglas A. Foster. 2000. Service Use over Time and Achievement of Stable Housing in a Men- tally Ill Homeless Population. Psychiatric Services 51(12):1536-43.
  10. Rosenheck, Robert. 2000. Cost-Effectiveness of Services for Mentally Ill Homeless Peo- ple: The Application of Research to Policy and Practice. American Journal of Psychiatry 157(10):1563-70.
  11. Salit, Sharon A., Evelyn M. Kuhn, Arthur J. Hartz, Jade M. Vu, and Andrew L. Mosso. 1998. Hospitalization Costs Associated with Homelessness in New York City. New Eng- land Journal of Medicine 338(24):1734-40.
  12. Shern, David L., Chip J. Felton, Richard L. Hough, Anthony F. Lehman, Stephen M. Goldfinger, Elie Valencia, Deborah Dennis, Roger Straw, and Patricia A. Wood. 1997. Housing Outcomes for Homeless Adults with Mental Illness: Results from the Second- Round McKinney Program. Psychiatric Services 48(2):239-41.
  13. Tsemberis, Sam. 1999. From Streets to Homes: An Innovative Approach to Supported Housing for Homeless Adults with Psychiatric Disabilities. Journal of Community Psy- chology 27(2):225-41.
  14. Tsemberis, Sam, and Rhonda F. Eichenberg. 2000. Pathways to Housing: Supported Housing for Street-Dwelling Homeless Individuals with Psychiatric Disabilities. Psychi- atric Services 51(4):487-93.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Culhane, D. P., Metraux, S., & Hadley, T.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Housing Policy Debate
Published
2002-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
107-163
ISSN
  • 1051-1482 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-050X
OpenAlex
W2118672011
Cited by
515
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 33
FWCI
34.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Housing Policy Debate (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
  • ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
homeless people, severe mental illness, supported housing, public service utilization, shelter use, hospitalization, incarceration, cost-benefit analysis, public investment, New York City

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review