Cited by 111Food Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsHealth disparities and outcomesHomelessness and Social Issues

Linking neighborhood characteristics to food insecurity in older adults: The role of perceived safety, social cohesion, and walkability

Open access
Chung, Wai Ting, Gallo, William T., Giunta, Nancy, Canavan, Maureen E., Parikh, Nina S., Fahs, Marianne C.·2012·Journal of Urban Health

Abstract

Among the 14.6% of American households experiencing food insecurity, approximately 2 million are occupied by older adults. Food insecurity among older adults has been linked to poor health, lower cognitive function, and poor mental health outcomes. While evidence of the association between individual or household-level factors and food insecurity has been documented, the role of neighborhood-level factors is largely understudied. This study uses data from a representative sample of 1,870 New York City senior center participants in 2008 to investigate the relationship between three neighborhood-level factors (walkability, safety, and social cohesion) and food insecurity among the elderly. Issues relating to food security were measured by three separate outcome measures: whether the participant had a concern about having enough to eat this past month (concern about food security), whether the participant was unable to afford food during the past year (insufficient food intake related to financial resources), and whether the participant experienced hunger in the past year related to not being able to leave home (mobility-related food insufficiency). Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression was performed for each measure of food insecurity. Results indicate that neighborhood walkability is an important correlate of mobility-related food insufficiency and concern about food insecurity, even after controlling the effects of other relevant factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11524-011-9633-y

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chung et al. [45] found that people living in walkable communities had a lower risk of food insecurity due to physical limitations.

    “Chung et al. [45] found that people living in walkable communities had a lower risk of food insecurity due to physical limitations.”

    From Food Insecurity, Walkability, and Social Determinants of Health: A Cross-Sectional, County-Level Study of Associations with Maternal and Infant Mortality in the United States (2025) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Mobility-Related Food Insufficiency results report that greater neighborhood walkability was associated with lower odds of hunger because participants could not leave home, including after adjustment. But the survey question did not establish that physical limitations caused their inability to leave home; physical disability was measured separately as a covariate. The study concerned New York City senior center participants, not people generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]19. Frongillo EA, Valois P, Wolfe WS. Using a concurrent events approach to understand social support and food insecurity among elders. Fam Econ Nutr Rev. 2003; 15: 25-32.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chung, W. T., Gallo, W. T., Giunta, N., Canavan, M. E., Parikh, N. S., & Fahs, M. C.
Affiliations
  • CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy (US)
  • City University of New York (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Gallo, William T.
Venue
Journal of Urban Health
Published
2011-12-13
Volume
89
Issue
3
Pages
407-418
ISSN
  • 0028-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-3460
  • 1468-2869
OpenAlex
W2046599094
Cited by
111
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Urban Health (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
Keywords
food insecurity, older adults, neighborhood characteristics, perceived safety, social cohesion, walkability, hunger, senior centers, New York City
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Food Supply, Humans, Hunger, Male, Middle Aged, New York City, Surveys and Questionnaires, Residence Characteristics, Safety, Social Support, Walking, Mobility Limitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review