Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 320Online and Blended LearningEvaluation of Teaching PracticesTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A professional development framework for online teaching

Baran, Evrim, Correia, Ana-Paula·2014·TechTrends

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11528-014-0791-0

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Correia, A.-P., & Yusop, F. (2010). Teaching Online: A Quick Reference for Online Instructors. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Seed Science Center.
  2. Oblinger, D., Barone, C., & Hawkins, B. (2001). Distributed education and its challenges: An overview. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.

Cited by

See all 320

Metadata

Authors
Baran, E., & Correia, A.-P.
Affiliations
  • Middle East Technical University (TR)
  • Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
Baran, Evrim
Venue
TechTrends
Published
2014-08-07
Volume
58
Issue
5
Pages
95-101
ISSN
  • 1559-7075 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-3894
OpenAlex
W2000581556
Cited by
261
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10
FWCI
51.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
TechTrends (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
online learning, teacher professional development, online pedagogy, higher education, online instructors, professional development framework, teacher support, online learning programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A professional development framework for online teaching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11528-014-0791-0
The paper
Baran, E., & Correia, A.-P. (2014). A professional development framework for online teaching. TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0791-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.