CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 62Educational Technology and E-LearningVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesSoftware Engineering Techniques and Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Software Engineering Design Principles Applied to Instructional Design: What can we Learn from our Sister Discipline?

Adnan, Nor Hafizah, Ritzhaupt, Albert D.·2018·TechTrends
DOI 10.1007/s11528-017-0238-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11528-017-0238-5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The disadvantages of ADDIE are directly related to the mistakes of educational designers.

    “In addition, the disadvantages of a model, namely, ADDIE, are directly related to the mistakes of educational designers (e.g., Adnan and Ritzhaupt [34]; and Reinbold [58]).”

    From A Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education (2022) · cites this paper as Adnan and Ritzhaupt [34]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 77

  1. Baldwin, C., & Clark, K. (2000). Design rules: The power of modularity. Cambridge: MIT Press. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Barak, M., & Ziv, S. (2013). Wandering: A web-based platform for the creation of location-based interactive learning objects. Computers & Education, 62, 159–170. · DOI
  3. Bauer, C., & Dey, A. K. (2016). Considering context in the design of intelligent systems: Current practices and suggestions for improvement. The Journal of Systems and Software, 112, 26–47. · DOI
  4. Biju, S. M. (2008). Agile software development. e-Learning, 5(1), 97–102.
  5. Booch, G., Maksimchuk, R. A., Engle, M. W., Young, B. J., Conallen, J., & Houston, K. A. (2007). Object-oriented analysis and design with applications (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
  6. Branson, R. K., Rayner, G. T., Cox, J. L., Furman, J. P., King, F. J., & Hannum, W. H. (1975). Interservice procedures for instructional systems development. (TRADOC pam 350–30, NAVEDTRA 106A). Ft Monroe, VA: U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command. · DOI
  7. Bruff, D. O., Fisher, D. H., McEwen, K. E., & Smith, B. E. (2013). Wrapping a MOOC: Student perceptions of an experiment in blended learning. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 187–199.
  8. Colburn, T. R., & Shute, G. M. (2008). Metaphor in computer science. Journal of Applied Logic, 6(4), 526–533. · DOI
  9. Dalal, N. (2012). Teaching tip: Using rapid game prototyping for exploring requirements discovery and modeling. Journal of Information Systems Education, 23(4), 341–344.
  10. Daugherty, J., Teng, Y. T., & Cornachione, E. (2007, Feb 28-Mar 4). Rapid prototyping instructional design: Revisiting the ISD model. Paper presented at International Research Conference in The Americas of the Academy of Human Resource Development, Indianapolis, IN.
  11. de Bettio, R. W., Pereira, D. A., Martins, R. X., & Heimfarth, T. (2013). The experience of using the scrum process in the production of learning objects for blended learning. Informatics in Education, 12(1), 29–41. · DOI
  12. de la Fuente-Valentin, L., Pardo, A., & Kloos, C. D. (2011). Generic service integration in adaptive learning experiences using IMS learning design. Computers & Education, 57, 1160–1170. · DOI
  13. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2009). The systematic design of instruction (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Merrill.
  14. Douglas, I. (2006). Issues in software engineering of relevance to instructional design. TechTrends, 50(5), 28–35. · DOI
  15. Douglas, I., & Schaffer, S. P. (2002). Object-oriented performance improvement. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 15(3), 81–93. · DOI
  16. Ericsson, A., & Erixon, G. (1999). Controlling design variants: Modular product platforms. Dearborn: Society of Manufacturing Engineers.
  17. Ertmer, P. A., Driscoll, M. P., & Wager, W. W. (2003). The legacy of Robert Mills Gagne. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational Psychology: A century of contributions: A project of division 15 (Educational Psychology) of the American psychology association (pp. 303–332). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  18. Farley, H., Murphy, A., Johnson, C., Carter, B., Lane, M., Midgley, W., Baig, A. H., Dekeyser, S., & Koronios, A. (2015). How do students use their mobile devices to support learning? A case study from an Australian regional university. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.ar · DOI
  19. Frimpon, M. F. (2012). A re-structuring of the critical success factors for e-learning deployment. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(3), 115–127.
  20. Fulton, C. D. (2010). Rapid prototyping in instructional design: Creating competencies (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Minneapolis: Capella University.
  21. Gamma, E., Helms, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1995). Design patterns: Elements of reusable object-oriented software. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
  22. Gardner, J. (2010). Applying Merrill’s first principles of instruction: Practical methods based on a review of the literature. Educational Technology Magazine, 50(2), 20–25.
  23. Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Catrambone, R. (2004). Designing instructional examples to reduce intrinsic cognitive load: Molar versus modular presentation of solution procedures. Instructional Science, 32, 33–58. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Gibbons, A. S. (2010). A contextual framework for identifying instructional design patterns. In P. Goodyear & S. Retalis (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning: Design patterns and pattern languages (pp. 29–47). Rotterdam: Sense Publisher. · DOI
  25. Gibbons, A. S. (2014). An architectural approach to instructional design. New York: Routledge.
  26. Gordon, J., & Zemke, R. (2000). The attack on ISD. Training, 37(4), 42–53.
  27. Gren, L., Torkar, R., & Feldt, R. (2017). Group development and group maturity when building agile teams: A qualitative and quantitative investigation at eight large companies. The Journal of Systems and Software, 124, 104–119. · DOI
  28. Gustafson, K. L. (2002). The future of instructional design. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 333–343). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
  29. Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). Survey of instructional development models (4th ed.). Syracuse: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology.
  30. Hartmann, B. (2009). Gaining design insight through interaction prototyping tools (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Stanford University Publications.
  31. Hummel, H., Manderveld, J., Tattersall, C., & Koper, R. (2004). Educational modeling language and learning design: New opportunities for instructional reusability and personalised learning. International Journal of Learning Technology, 1(1), 111–126. · DOI
  32. Ikeda, T. (2013). Pedagogical reflections on the role of modelling in mathematics instruction. In G. A. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum, & J. P. Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modelling: Connecting to research and practice (pp. 255–276). Dordretcht: Springer. · DOI
  33. Jeremic, Z., Jovanovic, J., & Gasevic, D. (2009). Evaluating an intelligent tutoring system for design patterns: The DEPTHS experience. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 111–130.
  34. Johnson, D. L. (2006). Designing to learn: Using agile software engineering methods for participatory instructional design. Ann Arbor: ProQuest.
  35. Jones, P., & Davis, R. (2008). Instructional design methods integrating instructional technology. In T. T. Kidd & H. Song (Eds.), Handbook of research on instructional systems and technology (pp. 15–27). Hershey: IGI Global. · DOI
  36. Jones, T. S., & Richey, R. C. (2000). Rapid prototyping methodology in action: A developmental study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 63–80. · DOI
  37. Kaminski, J. A., Sloutsky, V. M., & Heckler, A. F. (2008). The advantage of abstract examples in learning math. Science 320(5874), 454-455. · DOI
  38. Knowlton, D. S. (2006). Rapid prototyping as method for developing instructional strategies for supporting computer-mediated communication among university students. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 75–87.
  39. Kohls, C., & Uttecht, J. G. (2009). Lessons learnt in mining and writing design patterns for educational interactive graphics. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1040–1055. · DOI
  40. Laws, D., Howell, S., & Lindsay, N. (2003). Scalability in distance education: “Can we have our cake and eat it too?”. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 6(4). Retrieved from: https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter64/laws64.htm
  41. Lim, G. (2007). Instructional design and pedagogical considerations for the ins-and-outs of learning objects. In A. Koohang & K. Harman (Eds.), Learning objects and instructional design (pp. 89–138). Santa Rosa: Information Science Press.
  42. Mahnic, V. (2012). A capstone course on agile software development using scrum. IEEE Transactions on Education, 55(1), 99–106. · DOI
  43. Manning, K., Kinzie, J., & Schuh, J. H. (2014). One size does not fit all: Traditional and innovative models of student affairs practice (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.
  44. Martin, F., Hoskins, O. J., Brooks, R., & Bennett, T. (2013). Development of an interactive multimedia instructional module. Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 3(3), 5–17.
  45. McAndrew, P., Goodyear, P., & Dalziel, J. (2006). Patterns, designs and activities: Unifying descriptions of learning structures. International Journal of Learning Technology, 2(2), 216–242. · DOI
  46. Merrill, M. D. (2009). First principles of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. Carr (Eds.), Instructional design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. III, pp. 41–56). New York: Routledge.
  47. Merrill, M. D., & ID2 Research Group. (1998). ID expert: A second generational instructional development system. Instructional Science, 26, 243–262. · DOI
  48. Molenda, M., & Boling, E. (2008). Creating. In A. Januszewski & M. Molenda (Eds.), Educational technology: A definition with commentary (pp. 81–140). New York: Taylor & Francis.
  49. Morris, E. (2009). Engineering reusable learning objects. In P. F. Tiako (Ed.), Software applications: Concepts, methodologies, tools and applications (pp. 718–735). Hershey: Information Science Reference. · DOI
  50. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kalman, H. K., & Kemp, J. E. (2013). Designing effective instruction (7th ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
  51. Natale, S. M., Libertella, A. F., Sora, S. A., & Ulin, J. (2007). Raising the level of abstraction in online education: The context. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 4(12), 27–32.
  52. Njenga, J. K. (2005). Instructional design process in a web-based learning management system: Design, implementation and evaluation issues (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from University of the Western Cape Electronic Theses and Dissertations Repository.
  53. Opt, S., & Sims, C. L. (2015). Scrum: Enhancing student team organization and collaboration. Communication Teacher, 29(1), 55–62. · DOI
  54. Parmaxi, A., Zaphiris, P., & Ioannou, A. (2016). Enacting artifact-based activities for social technologies in language learning using a design-based research approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 556–567. · DOI
  55. Piotrowski, M. (2009). Document-oriented e-learning components (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ERIC database.
  56. Polsani, P. R. (2003). Use and abuse of reusable learning objects. Journal of Digital Information, 3(4), 164.
  57. Pressman, R. S. (2005). Software engineering: A practitioner’s approach (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  58. Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). What is instructional design theory? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 5–29). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  59. Retbi, A., Merrouch, F., Idrissi, M. K., & Bennani, S. (2012). Towards a visual educational modeling language for effective learning. International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 9(3), 382–390.
  60. Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2010). Learning object systems and strategy: A description and discussion. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 6, 217–238. · DOI
  61. Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Kumar, S. (2015). Knowledge and skills needed by instructional designers in higher education. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 28(3), 51–69. · DOI · Paper page
  62. Rockley, A., Kostur, P., & Manning, S. (2003). Managing enterprise content: A unified content strategy. Indiana: New Riders.
  63. Romiszowski, A. J. (2004). How’s the e-learning baby? Factors leading to success or failure of an educational technology innovation. Educational Technology, 44(1), 5–27.
  64. Roytek, M. A. (2010). Enhancing instructional design efficiency: Methodologies employed by instructional designers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 170–180. · DOI
  65. Scott, E., Rodriguez, G., Soria, A., & Campo, M. (2016). Towards better scrum learning using learning styles. The Journal of Systems and Software, 111, 242–253. · DOI
  66. Sela, E., & Sivan, Y. Y. (2009). Enterprise e-learning success factors: An analysis of practitioners’ perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 5, 335–343. · DOI
  67. Shor, R. M. (2012). ADDIE +: Adopting proven practices from the IT industry. T+D, 66(5), 56.
  68. Spector, J. M. (2001). A philosophy of instructional design for the 21st century? Journal of Structural Learning and Intelligent Systems, 14(4), 307–318.
  69. Stare, A. (2014). Agile project management in product development projects. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 295–304. · DOI
  70. Tabak, F., & Rampal, R. (2014). Synchronous e-learning: Reflections and design considerations. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 10(4), 80–92.
  71. Tezcan, M. (2013). Cost estimation in e-learning design project management. In G. Eby & T. V. Yuzer (Eds.), Project management approaches for online learning design (pp. 334–247). Hershey: IGI Global.
  72. van Gurp, J. (1999). Design principles for reusable, composable and extensible fameworks (unpublished master thesis). Sweden: University of Karlskrona/Ronneby.
  73. Wiley, D. A. (2002). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc .
  74. Willis, J. W. (2008). Qualitative research methods in education and educational technology. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing Inc..
  75. Yelon, S. (2006). Face-to-face or online? Choosing the medium in blended training. Performance Improvement, 45(3), 22–26. · DOI
  76. Zemke, R., & Rossett, A. (2002). A hard look at ISD. Training, 39(2), 27–33.
  77. Zhang, X., & Dorn, B. (2012). Accelerating software development through agile practices: A case study of a small-scale, time-intensive web development project at a college-level IT competition. Journal of Information Technology Education, 11, 25–37.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Adnan, N. H., & Ritzhaupt, A. D.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Ritzhaupt, Albert D.
ORCID
Venue
TechTrends
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-12-08
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
77-94
ISSN
  • 1559-7075 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-3894
DOI
10.1007/s11528-017-0238-5
OpenAlex
W2773794555
Cited by
62
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
correction (2018-10-16)
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
TechTrends (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Keywords
instructional design, online learning, instructional design model, abstraction, modularity, reusability, maintainability, scalability, extensibility, compatibility, instructional design process, teaching quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review