Cited by 17Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationUltrasound in Clinical Applications

Deep learning-based plane pose regression in obstetric ultrasound

Open access
Di Vece, Chiara, Dromey, Brian, Vasconcelos, Francisco, David, Anna L., Peebles, Donald, Stoyanov, Danail·2022·International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

Abstract

PURPOSE: In obstetric ultrasound (US) scanning, the learner's ability to mentally build a three-dimensional (3D) map of the fetus from a two-dimensional (2D) US image represents a major challenge in skill acquisition. We aim to build a US plane localisation system for 3D visualisation, training, and guidance without integrating additional sensors. METHODS: We propose a regression convolutional neural network (CNN) using image features to estimate the six-dimensional pose of arbitrarily oriented US planes relative to the fetal brain centre. The network was trained on synthetic images acquired from phantom 3D US volumes and fine-tuned on real scans. Training data was generated by slicing US volumes into imaging planes in Unity at random coordinates and more densely around the standard transventricular (TV) plane. RESULTS: With phantom data, the median errors are 0.90 mm/1.17[Formula: see text] and 0.44 mm/1.21[Formula: see text] for random planes and planes close to the TV one, respectively. With real data, using a different fetus with the same gestational age (GA), these errors are 11.84 mm/25.17[Formula: see text]. The average inference time is 2.97 ms per plane. CONCLUSION: The proposed network reliably localises US planes within the fetal brain in phantom data and successfully generalises pose regression for an unseen fetal brain from a similar GA as in training. Future development will expand the prediction to volumes of the whole fetus and assess its potential for vision-based, freehand US-assisted navigation when acquiring standard fetal planes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11548-022-02609-z

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 17

Authors
Di Vece, C., Dromey, B., Vasconcelos, F., David, A. L., Peebles, D., & Stoyanov, D.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (GB)
  • UCL Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
Venue
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
Published
2022-04-30
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
833-839
ISSN
  • 1861-6410 (ISSN-L)
  • 1861-6429
OpenAlex
W4225144609
Cited by
17
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (203145/Z/16/Z)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/P027938/1, EP/R004080/1, EP/P012841/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Keywords
prenatal ultrasound, fetal brain, synthetic ultrasound images, ultrasound phantoms
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Neural Networks, Computer, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review