The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhancing the Trustworthiness of Qualitative Research in International Business
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
(1994) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80231-2 · Cited by 48,420
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 45,910
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.
Ellis, C., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074814 · Cited by 29,249
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
Case study research: design and methods
Phelan, S. (2011) · Evaluation & Research in Education · doi:10.1080/09500790.2011.582317 · Cited by 21,763
(1998) · Cited by 18,576
Hartley, J. (2004) · Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research · doi:10.4135/9781446280119.n26 · Cited by 15,461
Review of Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).
SITGREAVES, R. (1979) · Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.1037/018882 · Cited by 11,425
Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/bf00988593 · Cited by 11,133
Cited by
Qualitative research: deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis
Azungah, T. (2018) · Qualitative Research Journal · doi:10.1108/qrj-d-18-00035 · Cited by 1,262
Triangulation in industrial qualitative case study research: Widening the scope
Farquhar, J., Michels, N., & Robson, J. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.001 · Cited by 253
Qualitative research in marketing: what can academics do better?
Crick, J. M. (2021) · Journal of Strategic Marketing · doi:10.1080/0965254x.2020.1743738 · Cited by 172
Global networks as a mode of balance for exploratory innovations in a late liberalizing economy
Khan, Z., Rao-Nicholson, R., & Tarba, S. Y. (2018) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2016.10.002 · Cited by 93
Daniel, B. K. (2018) · Qualitative Research Journal · doi:10.1108/qrj-d-17-00012 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Sinkovics, R. R., Penz, E., & Ghauri, P. N.
- Venue
- Management International Review
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 689-714
- ISSN
- 0938-8249 (ISSN-L)
- 1861-8901
- OpenAlex
- W2070349754
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 77
- FWCI
- 65.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancing the Trustworthiness of Qualitative Research in International Business. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11575-008-0103-z
- The paper
- Sinkovics, R. R., Penz, E., & Ghauri, P. N. (2008). Enhancing the Trustworthiness of Qualitative Research in International Business. Management International Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-008-0103-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.