Cited by 40Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsAortic Thrombus and EmbolismAppendicitis Diagnosis and Management

Interpretation of Abdominal CT Findings in Patients Who Develop Acute on Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia

Kärkkäinen, Jussi M., Saari, Petri, Kettunen, Hannu-Pekka, Lehtimäki, Tiina T., Vanninen, Ritva, Paajanen, Hannu, Manninen, Hannu·2016·Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background We studied whether ischemia-specific computed tomography (CT) findings are consistently detectable in patients who develop acute on chronic mesenteric ischemia (AOCMI), whereas absent in chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI). Methods Consecutive patients with symptomatic angiography-verified atherosclerotic obstruction of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) were categorized as AOCMI (n = 27) or CMI (n = 20). Three experienced radiologists blindly evaluated the contrast-enhanced CTs for vascular and intestinal findings. Kappa statistics was used to test interobserver agreement. Results Two observers had substantial agreement (k = 0.66) that two thirds of AOCMI patients showed ischemia-specific CT findings (decreased bowel wall enhancement, pneumatosis, or thrombotic SMA clot); the third observer agreed only fairly regarding pneumatosis and thrombosis (k = 0.3-0.4). All observers had substantial agreement (k = 0.65-0.71) that most patients with AOCMI had unspecific intestinal findings such as mesenteric fat stranding in up to 96%, bowel lumen dilatation in 93%, and bowel wall thickening in 70%, while only few patients with CMI had such findings (due to chronic ischemic colitis) (P < 0.001). Conclusion One third of AOCMI patients presented without any ischemia-specific CT signs. However, any intestinal abnormality in CT together with SMA obstruction should raise suspicion of intestinal ischemia. Furthermore, clinicians need to be aware of the interobserver variability in the CT interpretation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11605-015-3013-y

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kärkkäinen, J. M., Saari, P., Kettunen, H.-P., Lehtimäki, T. T., Vanninen, R., Paajanen, H., & Manninen, H.
Affiliations
  • Kuopio University Hospital (FI)
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
Corresponding author
Kärkkäinen, Jussi M.
Venue
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
791-802
ISSN
1091-255X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2190682986
Cited by
40
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic Thrombus and Embolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
chronic mesenteric ischemia, contrast-enhanced CT findings, bowel wall enhancement, pneumatosis intestinalis, mesenteric thrombosis, mesenteric fat stranding, bowel dilatation, bowel wall thickening, interobserver agreement, intestinal ischemia
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Angiography, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Intestines, Male, Pneumatosis Cystoides Intestinalis, Retrospective Studies, Thrombosis, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Observer Variation, Mesenteric Artery, Superior, Atherosclerosis, Mesenteric Ischemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review