Cited by 6Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementVascular anomalies and interventions

Development of a Novel Scoring Model to Estimate the Severity Grade of Mesenteric Artery Stenosis

Open access
Omran, Safwan, Konietschke, Frank, Mueller, Verena, de Bucourt, Maximilian, Frese, Jan Paul, Greiner, Andreas·2022·Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to derive a new scoring model from estimating the severity grade of mesenteric artery stenosis. We sought to analyze the relationship between the new scoring model and the development, treatment, and mortality of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI). Methods: This retrospective study included 242 patients (128 (53%) women and 114 (47%) men) with suspected CMI from January 2011 to December 2020. A weighted sum six-point score (CSI-score; the celiac artery is abbreviated by “C”, superior mesenteric artery by “S”, and inferior mesenteric artery by “I”) based on the number of affected vessels and the extent and grade of the stenosis or occlusion of the involved visceral arteries was derived by maximizing the area under the ROC curve. The calculated CSI-score ranged from 0 to 22. The patients were divided according to the best cut-off point into low-score (CSI-score < 8) and high-score (CSI-score ≥ 8) groups. Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the CSI-score was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82–0.91). The best cut-off point of “8” represented the highest value of Youden’s index (0.58) with a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 72%. The cohort was divided according to the cut-off point into a low-score group (n = 100 patients, 41%) and high-score group (n = 142 patients, 59%) and according to the clinical presentation into a CMI group (n = 109 patients, 45%) and non-CMI group (n = 133 patients, 55%). The median CSI-score for all patients was 10 (range: 0 -22). High-scoring patients showed statistically significant higher rates of coronary artery disease (54% vs. 36%, p = 0.007), chronic renal insufficiency (50% vs. 30%, p = 0.002), and peripheral arterial disease (57% vs. 16%, p < 0.001). A total of 109 (45%) patients underwent invasive treatment of the visceral arteries and were more often in the high-score group (69% vs. 11%, p < 0.001). Of those, 79 (72%) patients underwent primary endovascular treatment, and 44 (40%) patients underwent primary open surgery or open conversion after endovascular treatment. Sixteen (7%) patients died during the follow-up, with a statistically significant difference between high- and low-scoring patients (9% vs. 0%, p = 0.008). The score stratification showed that the percentage of patients treated with endovascular and open surgical methods, the recurrence of the stenosis or failure of the endovascular treatment, the need for a bypass procedure, and the mortality rates significantly increased in the subgroups. The CSI-score demonstrated an excellent ability to discriminate between patients who needed treatment and those who did not, with an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82–0.91). Additionally, the CSI-score’s ability to predict the patients’ mortality was moderate, with an AUC of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.62–0.83). Conclusions: The new scoring model can estimate the severity grade of the stenosis of the mesenteric arteries. Our study showed a strong association of the score with the presence of chronic mesenteric ischemia, the need for treatment, the need for open surgery, and mortality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jcm11247420

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CSI score has excellent ability to predict degree of mesenteric artery stenosis and strong association with need for treatment, open surgery, and mortality.

    “The CSI score has shown an excellent ability to predict the degree of mesenteric artery stenosis and a strong association with the need for treatment, open surgery, and mortality [80].”

    From Revascularization Strategies for Acute and Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia: A Narrative Review (2024) · cites this paper as [80]

    The Abstract and Results §3.4 report strong associations with the need for treatment, open surgery, and mortality, and excellent discrimination for whether patients needed treatment (AUC 0.87). The paper says the score can estimate stenosis severity, but it does not report excellent predictive performance for the degree of stenosis; the cited excellent-performance result concerns treatment need. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Having a 50-70% stenosis of multiple mesenteric arteries is associated with a higher risk of CMI.

    “Moreover, different studies classifying stenosis grade as &lt; 50%, 50 e 70%, and &gt; 70% demonstrated that having a 50 e 70% stenosis of multiple mesenteric arteries was associated with a higher risk of CMI. 15,16”

    From Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2025 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Diseases of the Mesenteric and Renal Arteries and Veins. (2025) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Results (§3.1; page unavailable) show that two- and three-vessel stenosis was more common among CMI patients than non-CMI patients. The Discussion (§4; page unavailable) mentions 50–70% stenosis as a category used in another scoring model, but does not show that stenosis in that specific range across multiple arteries is associated with higher CMI risk. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Higher CSI-score patients show statistically higher rates of coronary artery disease, chronic renal insufficiency, and peripheral artery disease.

    “The study found higher-scoring patients to show statistically higher rates of coronary artery disease, chronic renal insufficiency, and peripheral artery disease [80].”
  • CSI-score stratification showed many high-score participants underwent endovascular, open surgical, or open conversion after endovascular treatment for chronic mesenteric ischemia.

    “The score stratification showed that many high-score participants underwent endovascular, open surgical, or open conversion after endovascular treatment for chronic mesenteric ischemia [80].”
  • Patients with higher CSI scores demonstrated a significantly higher mortality rate.

    “Patients with higher scores also demonstrated a significantly higher mortality rate [80].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Omran, S., Konietschke, F., Mueller, V., de Bucourt, M., Frese, J. P., & Greiner, A.
Affiliations
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Department of Radiology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 12203 Berlin, Germany
Corresponding author
Omran, Safwan
Venue
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-12-14
Volume
11
Issue
24
Pages
7420
ISSN
2077-0383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4311791441
Cited by
6
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Universitätsbibliothek der FU Berlin Hochschulschriftenstelle u. Dokumentenserver (cc-by)
Funders
  • German Research Foundation (DFG)
  • Open Access Publication Funds of Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Vascular anomalies and interventions
Keywords
mesenteric artery stenosis, chronic mesenteric ischemia, scoring system, severity classification, visceral artery occlusion, celiac artery, superior mesenteric artery, inferior mesenteric artery, coronary artery disease, chronic renal insufficiency, peripheral arterial disease, mortality, revascularization, risk stratification, prognostic model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review