Cited by 178Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentPain Management and Opioid Use

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physicians’ Perspectives on Prescribing Benzodiazepines for Older Adults: A Qualitative Study

Open access
Cook, Joan M., Marshall, Randall, Masci, Christina, Coyne, James C.·2007·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background There is a continued high prevalence of benzodiazepine use by older community-residing adults and of their continued prescription by practitioners, despite well known adverse effects and the availability of safer, effective alternatives.Objectives To understand factors influencing chronic use of benzodiazepines in older adults.Design Qualitative study, semistructured interviews with physicians.Participants Thirty-three practicing primary care physicians around Philadelphia.Approach Qualitative interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and entered into a qualitative software program. A multidisciplinary team coded transcripts and developed themes.Results Physicians generally endorsed benzodiazepines as effective treatment for anxiety, citing quick action and strong patient satisfaction. The use of benzodiazepines in older adults was not seen to be problematic because they did not show drug-seeking or escalating dose behavior suggesting addiction. Physicians minimized other risks of benzodiazepines and did not view monitoring or restricting renewal of prescriptions as an important clinical focus relative to higher-priority medical issues. Many physicians expressed skepticism about risks of continued use and considerable pessimism in the successful taper/discontinuation in older patients with long-term use and prior failed attempts. Physicians also anticipated patient resistance to any such efforts, including switching physicians.Conclusions Primary care physicians are averse to addressing the public health problem of benzodiazepine overuse in the elderly. Their attitudes generally conflict with practice guidelines and they complain of a lack of training in constructive strategies to address this problem. A 2-pronged effort should focus on increasing skill level and preventing new cases of benzodiazepine dependency through improved patient education and vigilant monitoring of prescription renewal.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-006-0021-3

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Stewart S. The effects of benzodiazepines on cognition. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66 (suppl 2):9–13.
  2. National Health Service Management Executive. The health of the nation: first steps for the NHS. Londong: NHSME, 1992.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 178

Metadata

Authors
Cook, J. M., Marshall, R., Masci, C., & Coyne, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Cook, Joan M.
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2007-01-25
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
303-307
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W1972782221
Cited by
178
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH068565, K01MH070859)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
benzodiazepines, older adults, chronic benzodiazepine use, benzodiazepine overuse, benzodiazepine tapering, benzodiazepine discontinuation, anxiety treatment, physician training, primary care
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Attitude of Health Personnel, Benzodiazepines, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Physicians, Drug Prescriptions, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review