Cited by 33Medication Adherence and ComplianceHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementPain Management and Placebo Effect

Placebo Adherence and Its Association with Morbidity and Mortality in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Open access
Avins, Andrew L., Pressman, Alice, Ackerson, Lynn, Rudd, Peter, Neuhaus, John, Vittinghoff, Eric·2010·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A provocative finding from several double-blind clinical trials has been the association between greater adherence to placebo study medication and better health outcomes. We used data from the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) Treatment Trial (SOLVD-TT) and the SOLVD Prevention Trial (SOLVD-PT) to examine whether such associations could be validated and to examine several sources of bias and potential confounding. METHODS: Survival analytic methods were used to estimate the association between placebo adherence and several health outcomes, employing a number of modeling techniques to test for the existence of alternative explanations for the association. Higher adherence was defined as having taken ≥75% of prescribed study medication. RESULTS: Higher placebo adherence was associated with improved overall survival in both SOLVD-TT and SOLVD-PT [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.35 to 0.79 and HR = 0.52, 95%CI: 0.38 to 0.71, respectively]. Associations were similar for fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular or coronary heart disease events. Adjustment for both modifiable and non-modifiable cardiac risk factors (including age, gender, diabetes, blood pressure, smoking, weight, alcohol use, and levels of education) had minimal effect on the strength of the association. Little evidence of bias was found as an explanation for this relationship. CONCLUSIONS: In these two trials, better adherence to placebo was associated with markedly superior health outcomes, including total in-study mortality and incident cardiovascular events. No important confounders were identified. These data suggest there may exist strong but unrecognized determinants of health outcomes for which placebo adherence is a marker.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-010-1477-8

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Medical studies have shown that adherence is associated with better outcomes, regardless of whether patients received placebo or active interventions.

    “Medical studies have shown that adherence is associated with better outcomes, regardless of whether patients received placebo or active interventions [78,79].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Avins, A. L., Pressman, A., Ackerson, L., Rudd, P., Neuhaus, J., & Vittinghoff, E.
Affiliations
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Avins, Andrew L.
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2010-08-13
Volume
25
Issue
12
Pages
1275-1281
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2073244283
Cited by
33
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL081195)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
placebo effect, left ventricular dysfunction, overall survival, cardiovascular events, coronary artery disease, confounding, bias in clinical trials, SOLVD trial
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Double-Blind Method, Enalapril, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Morbidity, Patient Compliance, Placebo Effect, Treatment Outcome, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review