Cited by 310Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyWorkplace Spirituality and LeadershipPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Attention to Inpatients’ Religious and Spiritual Concerns: Predictors and Association with Patient Satisfaction

Open access
Williams, Joshua A., Meltzer, David, Arora, Vineet, Chung, Grace, Curlin, Farr A.·2011·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Little is known about how often patients desire and experience discussions with hospital personnel regarding R/S (religion and spirituality) or what effects such discussions have on patient satisfaction. OBJECTIVE, DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: We examined data from the University of Chicago Hospitalist Study, which gathers sociodemographic and clinical information from all consenting general internal medicine patients at the University of Chicago Medical Center. Main measures Primary outcomes were whether or not patients desired to have their religious or spiritual concerns addressed while hospitalized, whether or not anyone talked to them about religious and spiritual issues, and which member of the health care team spoke with them about these issues. Primary predictors were patients' ratings of their religious attendance, their efforts to carry their religious beliefs over into other dealings in life, and their spirituality. Key results Forty-one percent of inpatients desired a discussion of R/S concerns while hospitalized, but only half of those reported having such a discussion. Overall, 32% of inpatients reported having a discussion of their R/S concerns. Religious patients and those experiencing more severe pain were more likely both to desire and to have discussions of spiritual concerns. Patients who had discussions of R/S concerns were more likely to rate their care at the highest level on four different measures of patient satisfaction, regardless of whether or not they said they had desired such a discussion (odds ratios 1.4-2.2, 95% confidence intervals 1.1-3.0). Conclusions These data suggest that many more inpatients desire conversations about R/S than have them. Health care professionals might improve patients' overall experience with being hospitalized and patient satisfaction by addressing this unmet patient need.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-011-1781-y

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 29 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Williams, J. A., Meltzer, D., Arora, V., Chung, G., & Curlin, F. A.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2011-07-01
Volume
26
Issue
11
Pages
1265-1271
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2013429201
Cited by
310
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
FWCI
17.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (U18HS016967, R03HS018278)
  • National Institute on Aging (T35AG029795, K24AG031326)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K23AT002749)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
religion and spirituality, spiritual care, hospitalized patients, patient satisfaction, hospital care, religious service attendance, pain intensity, unmet patient needs, health care team communication, general internal medicine
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chicago, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Physician-Patient Relations, Psychometrics, Quality of Health Care, Religion, Residence Characteristics, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Patient Satisfaction, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review