The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attention to Inpatients’ Religious and Spiritual Concerns: Predictors and Association with Patient Satisfaction
Open accessAbstract
Background Little is known about how often patients desire and experience discussions with hospital personnel regarding R/S (religion and spirituality) or what effects such discussions have on patient satisfaction. OBJECTIVE, DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: We examined data from the University of Chicago Hospitalist Study, which gathers sociodemographic and clinical information from all consenting general internal medicine patients at the University of Chicago Medical Center. Main measures Primary outcomes were whether or not patients desired to have their religious or spiritual concerns addressed while hospitalized, whether or not anyone talked to them about religious and spiritual issues, and which member of the health care team spoke with them about these issues. Primary predictors were patients' ratings of their religious attendance, their efforts to carry their religious beliefs over into other dealings in life, and their spirituality. Key results Forty-one percent of inpatients desired a discussion of R/S concerns while hospitalized, but only half of those reported having such a discussion. Overall, 32% of inpatients reported having a discussion of their R/S concerns. Religious patients and those experiencing more severe pain were more likely both to desire and to have discussions of spiritual concerns. Patients who had discussions of R/S concerns were more likely to rate their care at the highest level on four different measures of patient satisfaction, regardless of whether or not they said they had desired such a discussion (odds ratios 1.4-2.2, 95% confidence intervals 1.1-3.0). Conclusions These data suggest that many more inpatients desire conversations about R/S than have them. Health care professionals might improve patients' overall experience with being hospitalized and patient satisfaction by addressing this unmet patient need.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“it appears to foster a positive relationship between health professionals and patients, enhancing treatment satisfaction27,28”
From Brazilian Psychiatric Association guidelines on the integration of spirituality into mental health clinical practice: Part 1. Spiritual history and differential diagnosis (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Notably, those who had discussed R/S concerns were much more likely to report the highest level of patient satisfaction.28”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“A study of 3,141 general internal medicine inpatients at the University of Chicago Medical Center found that 41% were open to discussing R/S issues while hospitalized, although only half reported having had such discussions.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & MacKenzie, C. R. (1987) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 · Cited by 49,742
Balboni, T. A., Vanderwerker, L. C., Block, S. D., Paulk, M. E., Lathan, C. S., Peteet, J. R., & Prigerson, H. G. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.07.9046 · Cited by 959
Religion index for psychiatric research
Koenig, H. G., Parkerson, G. R., & Meador, K. G. (1997) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.154.6.885b · Cited by 714
Through the Patientʼs Eyes: Understanding and Promoting Patient-Centered Care
Gerteis, M., Edgman‐Levitan, S., Daley, J., & Delbanco, T. L. (1997) · Journal for Healthcare Quality · doi:10.1097/01445442-199705000-00012 · Cited by 562
Patients Evaluate Their Hospital Care: A National Survey
Cleary, P. D., Edgman‐Levitan, S., Roberts, M. J., Moloney, T. W., McMullen, W., Walker, J. D., & Delbanco, T. L. (1991) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.10.4.254 · Cited by 556
Ehman, J. W., Ott, B. B., Short, T. H., Ciampa, R. C., & Hansen-Flaschen, J. (1999) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.159.15.1803 · Cited by 503
Religion, Spirituality, and Medicine: Research Findings and Implications for Clinical Practice
Koenig, H. G. (2004) · Southern Medical Journal · doi:10.1097/01.smj.0000146489.21837.ce · Cited by 441
Beliefs and attitudes of hospital inpatients about faith healing and prayer.
King, D. E., & Bushwick, B. (1994) · PubMed · Cited by 425
Moadel, A. B., Morgan, C., Fatone, A., Grennan, J., Carter, J., LaRuffa, G. M., Skummy, A., & Dutcher, J. P. (1999) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1611(199909/10)8:5 · Cited by 413
Johnson, K. S., Elbert‐Avila, K., & Tulsky, J. A. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53224.x · Cited by 341
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Handbook of Religion and Health
Koenig, H. G., VanderWeele, T. J., & Peteet, J. R. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190088859.001.0001 · Cited by 1,160
Determinants of patient satisfaction: a systematic review
Batbaatar, E., Dorjdagva, J., Luvsannyam, A., Savino, M. M., & Amenta, P. (2016) · Perspectives in Public Health · doi:10.1177/1757913916634136 · Cited by 872
Balboni, M. J., Sullivan, A., Amobi, A., Phelps, A. C., Gorman, D. P., Zollfrank, A., Peteet, J. R., Prigerson, H. G., VanderWeele, T. J., & Balboni, T. A. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.44.6443 · Cited by 457
Unmet spiritual care needs impact emotional and spiritual well-being in advanced cancer patients
Pearce, M. J., Coan, A., Herndon, J. E. I., Koenig, H., & Abernethy, A. (2012) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-011-1335-1 · Cited by 290
Do patients want doctors to talk about spirituality? A systematic literature review
Best, M., Butow, P., & Olver, I. (2015) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.04.017 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, J. A., Meltzer, D., Arora, V., Chung, G., & Curlin, F. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Venue
- Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Published
- 2011-07-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1265-1271
- ISSN
- 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-1497
- PMC
- PMC3208457
- OpenAlex
- W2013429201
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 17.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (U18HS016967, R03HS018278)
- National Institute on Aging (T35AG029795, K24AG031326)
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K23AT002749)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Keywords
- religion and spirituality, spiritual care, hospitalized patients, patient satisfaction, hospital care, religious service attendance, pain intensity, unmet patient needs, health care team communication, general internal medicine
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chicago, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Physician-Patient Relations, Psychometrics, Quality of Health Care, Religion, Residence Characteristics, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Patient Satisfaction, Spirituality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review