Cited by 214Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareHealthcare Policy and Management

Utilization of Primary and Obstetric Care After Medically Complicated Pregnancies: An Analysis of Medical Claims Data

Open access
Bennett, Wendy L., Chang, Hsien-Yen, Levine, David M., Wang, Lin, Neale, Donna, Werner, Erika F., Clark, Jeanne M.·2014·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Because pregnancy complications, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, are risk factors for diabetes and cardiovascular disease, post-delivery follow-up is recommended.Objective To determine predictors of post-delivery primary and obstetric care utilization in women with and without medical complications.Research design Five-year retrospective cohort study using commercial and Medicaid insurance claims in Maryland.Subjects 7,741 women with a complicated pregnancy (GDM, hypertensive disorders and pregestational diabetes mellitus [DM]) and 23,599 women with a comparison pregnancy.Measures We compared primary and postpartum obstetric care utilization rates in the 12 months after delivery between the complicated and comparison pregnancy groups. We conducted multivariate logistic regression to assess the association between pregnancy complications, sociodemographic predictor variables and utilization of care, stratified by insurance type.Results Women with a complicated pregnancy were older at delivery (p < 0.001), with higher rates of cesarean delivery (p < 0.0001) and preterm labor or delivery (p < 0.0001). Among women with Medicaid, 56.6% in the complicated group and 51.7% in the comparison group attended a primary care visit. Statistically significant predictors of receiving a primary care visit included non-Black race, older age, preeclampsia or DM, and depression. Among women with commercial health insurance, 60.0% in the complicated group and 49.5% in the comparison group attended a primary care visit. Pregnancy complication did not predict a primary care visit among women with commercial insurance.Conclusions Women with pregnancy complications were more likely to attend primary care visits post-delivery compared to the comparison group, but overall visit rates were low. Although Medicaid expansion has potential to increase coverage, innovative models for preventive health services after delivery are needed to target women at higher risk for chronic disease development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-013-2744-2

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attendance is lower among marginalized populations who may have limited resources.

    “Attendance is lower among marginalized populations who may have limited resources [64, 65]; these populations are also at increased risk for perinatal mental health conditions [9, 66].”

    From Factors associated with postpartum depression symptoms following antepartum hospitalization (2026) · cites this paper as [64]

    The ‘Utilization of Postpartum Obstetric Care’ section reports lower odds of attendance for Black women than for White or Hispanic women within the Medicaid group; the primary-care analysis shows a similar pattern. This supports an attendance disparity, but the study does not establish that marginalized populations generally have lower attendance or that limited resources explain the disparity. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bennett, W. L., Chang, H.-Y., Levine, D. M., Wang, L., Neale, D., Werner, E. F., & Clark, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Bennett, Wendy L.
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2014-01-29
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
636-645
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2015833610
Cited by
214
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL098476)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
complicated pregnancy, postpartum care utilization, primary care visits, obstetric care, gestational diabetes mellitus, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preeclampsia, pregestational diabetes, Medicaid, commercial health insurance, cesarean section, preterm labor, postpartum depression, racial disparities, Medicaid expansion, preventive medicine
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Insurance Claim Review, Insurance, Health, Maryland, Medicaid, Obstetrics, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Primary Health Care, Retrospective Studies, United States, Cohort Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review