The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554
Qualitative Data Analysis for Health Services Research: Developing Taxonomy, Themes, and Theory
Bradley, E. H., Curry, L. A., & Devers, K. J. (2007) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x · Cited by 3,437
Cited by
Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice
Esmail, L., Moore, E., & Rein, A. (2015) · Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research · doi:10.2217/cer.14.79 · Cited by 502
Manafo, E., Petermann, L., Mason-Lai, P., & Vandall-Walker, V. (2018) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-018-0282-4 · Cited by 482
Patient apprehensions about the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare
Richardson, J. P., Smith, C., Curtis, S., Watson, S., Zhu, X., Barry, B., & Sharp, R. R. (2021) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00509-1 · Cited by 424
O. B. O. T. C.-S. G., Grant, S., Mayo-Wilson, E., Montgomery, P., Macdonald, G., Michie, S., Hopewell, S., & Moher, D. (2018) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2735-z · Cited by 348
Frank, L., Forsythe, L., Ellis, L., Schrandt, S., Sheridan, S., Gerson, J., Konopka, K., & Daugherty, S. (2015) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0893-3 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Concannon, T. W., Fuster, M., Saunders, T., Patel, K., Wong, J. B., Leslie, L. K., & Lau, J.
- Venue
- Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Published
- 2014-06-04
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1692-1701
- ISSN
- 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-1497
- OpenAlex
- W2055243789
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11606-014-2878-x
- The paper
- Concannon, T. W., Fuster, M., Saunders, T., Patel, K., Wong, J. B., Leslie, L. K., & Lau, J. (2014). A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. Journal of General Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-2878-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
