Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 298

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mentorship of Women in Academic Medicine: a Systematic Review

Open access
Farkas, Amy H., Bonifacino, Eliana, Turner, Rose, Tilstra, Sarah A., Corbelli, Jennifer A.·2019·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-019-04955-2

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 298

Metadata

Authors
Farkas, A. H., Bonifacino, E., Turner, R., Tilstra, S. A., & Corbelli, J. A.
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2019-04-29
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
1322-1329
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2942953461
Cited by
298
References
27
FWCI
5.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mentorship of Women in Academic Medicine: a Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11606-019-04955-2
The paper
Farkas, A. H., Bonifacino, E., Turner, R., Tilstra, S. A., & Corbelli, J. A. (2019). Mentorship of Women in Academic Medicine: a Systematic Review. Journal of General Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-04955-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.