The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Achieving Gender Equity in Physician Compensation and Career Advancement: A Position Paper of the American College of Physicians
Abstract
Women comprise more than one third of the active physician workforce, an estimated 46% of all physicians-in-training, and more than half of all medical students in the United States. Although progress has been made toward gender diversity in the physician workforce, disparities in compensation exist and inequities have contributed to a disproportionately low number of female physicians achieving academic advancement and serving in leadership positions. Women in medicine face other challenges, including a lack of mentors, discrimination, gender bias, cultural environment of the workplace, imposter syndrome, and the need for better work-life integration. In this position paper, the American College of Physicians summarizes the unique challenges female physicians face over the course of their careers and provides recommendations to improve gender equity and ensure that the full potential of female physicians is realized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Race, Gender, and Partnership in the Patient-Physician Relationship
Cooper-Patrick, L. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.6.583 · Cited by 2,148
Mentoring in Academic Medicine: A Systematic Review
Sambunjak, D., Straus, S. E., & Marušić, A. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.9.1103 · Cited by 1,689
Physician Gender Effects in Medical Communication: A Meta-analytic Review
Roter, D. L., Hall, J. A., & Aoki, Y. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.6.756 · Cited by 1,427
Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention
Devine, P. G., Forscher, P. S., Austin, A. J., & Cox, W. T. L. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.06.003 · Cited by 1,259
Tsugawa, Y., Jena, A. B., Figueroa, J. F., Orav, E. J., Blumenthal, D. M., & Jha, A. K. (2017) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7875 · Cited by 1,063
The “Gender Gap” in Authorship of Academic Medical Literature — A 35-Year Perspective
Jagsi, R., Guancial, E. A., Worobey, C. C., Henault, L. E., Chang, Y., Starr, R., Tarbell, N. J., & Hylek, E. M. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa053910 · Cited by 870
Jolly, S., Griffith, K. A., DeCastro, R., Stewart, A., Ubel, P., & Jagsi, R. (2014) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m13-0974 · Cited by 812
Sex Differences in Physician Salary in US Public Medical Schools
Jena, A. B., Olenski, A. R., & Blumenthal, D. M. (2016) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3284 · Cited by 641
"Unlearning" automatic biases: The malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes.
Rudman, L. A., Ashmore, R. D., & Gary, M. L. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.856 · Cited by 508
Preventive Care for Women -- Does the Sex of the Physician Matter?
Lurie, N., Slater, J., McGovern, P., Ekstrum, J., Quam, L., & Margolis, K. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199308123290707 · Cited by 503
Cited by
Disrupting gender norms in health systems: making the case for change
Hay, K., McDougal, L., Percival, V., Henry, S., Klugman, J., Wurie, H., Raven, J., Shabalala, F., Fielding-Miller, R., Dey, A., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30648-8 · Cited by 442
Eliminating Explicit and Implicit Biases in Health Care: Evidence and Research Needs
Vela, M. B., Erondu, A. I., Smith, N. A., Peek, M. E., Woodruff, J. N., & Chin, M. H. (2022) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052620-103528 · Cited by 426
“Gender inequalities in salaries have been well documented (12, 62, 71).”
BackgroundMentorship of Women in Academic Medicine: a Systematic Review
Farkas, A. H., Bonifacino, E., Turner, R., Tilstra, S. A., & Corbelli, J. A. (2019) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-019-04955-2 · Cited by 298
Mamtani, M., Shofer, F., Mudan, A., Khatri, U., Walker, R., Perrone, J., & Aysola, J. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034056 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Butkus, R., Serchen, J., Moyer, D. V., Bornstein, S. S., Hingle, S. T., & for the Health and Public Policy Committee of the American College of Physicians*
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 2018-05-15
- Volume
- 168
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 721-723
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2802385597
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 88.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Achieving Gender Equity in Physician Compensation and Career Advancement: A Position Paper of the American College of Physicians. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/m17-3438
- The paper
- Butkus, R., Serchen, J., Moyer, D. V., Bornstein, S. S., Hingle, S. T., & for the Health and Public Policy Committee of the American College of Physicians*. (2018). Achieving Gender Equity in Physician Compensation and Career Advancement: A Position Paper of the American College of Physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/m17-3438
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
