Cited by 28Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHealthcare Systems and TechnologyPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Primary care provider attitudes and practices evaluating and managing patients with neurocognitive disorders

Open access
Bernstein, Alissa, Rogers, Kirsten M., Possin, Katherine L., Steele, Natasha Z. R., Ritchie, Christine S., Miller, Bruce L., Rankin, Katherine P.·2019·Journal of General Internal Medicine

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-019-05013-7

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most primary care providers report lacking time and confidence for the diagnostic process and prefer referring patients to specialists.

    “most PCPs cite a lack of time and confidence for the diagnostic process,7,8 preferring to refer patients to specialists.”

    From Review of Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Use in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (2026) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Results report low confidence in several diagnostic tasks and that 54% of surveyed PCPs referred at least 75% of patients with suspected neurocognitive disorders to specialists for a full workup. The Discussion mentions time as a commonly reported systems-level issue, but this study does not establish that most respondents cited lack of time as a reason for referral. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Many PCPs report low confidence disclosing a dementia diagnosis and providing post-diagnostic care.

    “Furthermore, the next steps following detection can be seen as a barrier as many PCPs report low confidence disclosing a dementia diagnosis and providing post‐diagnostic care.”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [718]

    The Results report that only 23% of surveyed PCPs were highly confident in providing a prognosis and stage-appropriate care, supporting the post-diagnostic care part of the claim. The paper does not report PCPs’ confidence in disclosing a dementia diagnosis; its findings about making a diagnosis do not establish confidence in communicating one. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernstein, A., Rogers, K. M., Possin, K. L., Steele, N. Z. R., Ritchie, C. S., Miller, B. L., & Rankin, K. P.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2019-05-01
Volume
34
Issue
9
Pages
1691-1692
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2943507290
Cited by
28
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Quest Diagnostics
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (T32HS022241)
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG056715)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (UH3NS105557, UG3NS105557)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
neurocognitive disorders, primary care providers, provider attitudes, clinical confidence, cognitive screening, specialist referral, neuropsychological assessment, MRI interpretation, diagnostic criteria, decision support system, older adults
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Disease Management, Neurocognitive Disorders, Physicians, Primary Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review