Cited by 90Electronic Health Records SystemsHospital Admissions and OutcomesMedical Coding and Health Information

Pajama time: working after work in the electronic health record

Open access
Saag, Harry S., Shah, Kanan, Jones, Simon A., Testa, Paul A., Horwitz, Leora I.·2019·Journal of General Internal Medicine

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-019-05055-x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Outside office hours, physicians spend an additional 1 to 2 hours of personal time doing computer and clerical work.

    “Outside office hours, physicians spend another 1 to 2 hours of personal time doing additional computer and clerical work, giving rise to the term “pajama time.””

    From Effect of an Electronic Health Record-Based Intervention on Documentation Practices (2024) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Results report that 573 ambulatory physicians averaged 83.3 minutes in the EHR on days without appointments, but only 17.3 minutes after hours on days with appointments. The paper supports the existence of work outside scheduled hours, not an unqualified claim that physicians spend another 1–2 hours after office hours. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saag, H. S., Shah, K., Jones, S. A., Testa, P. A., & Horwitz, L. I.
Affiliations
NYU Langone Health (US)
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2019-05-09
Volume
34
Issue
9
Pages
1695-1696
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2944454852
Cited by
90
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5
FWCI
7.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
  • School of Medicine, New York University
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
electronic health records, physician work hours
MeSH terms
Burnout, Professional, Humans, Physicians, Work Schedule Tolerance, Workload, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review