Cited by 72Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPain Management and Opioid Use

Opioid agonist therapy during hospitalization within the Veterans Health Administration: a pragmatic retrospective cohort analysis.

Open access
Priest, Kelsey C., Lovejoy, Travis I., Englander, Honora, Shull, Sarah, McCarty, Dennis·2020·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Hospitalization of patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) is increasing, yet little is known about opioid agonist therapy (OAT: methadone and buprenorphine) administration during admission.Objective Describe and examine patient- and hospital-level characteristics associated with OAT receipt during hospitalization in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).Participants A total of 12,407 unique patients, ≥ 18 years old, with an OUD-related ICD-10 diagnosis within 12 months prior to or during index hospitalization in fiscal year 2017 from 109 VHA hospitals in the continental U.S.Main measure OAT received during hospitalization.Key results Few admissions received OAT (n = 1914; 15%) and when provided it was most often for withdrawal management (n = 834; 7%). Among patients not on OAT prior to admission who survived hospitalization (n = 10,969), 2.0% (n = 203) were newly initiated on OAT with linkage to care after hospital discharge. Hospitals varied in the frequency of OAT delivery (range, 0 to 43% of qualified admissions). Patients with pre-admission OAT (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 15.30; 95% CI [13.2, 17.7]), acute OUD diagnosis (AOR = 2.3; 95% CI [1.99, 2.66]), and male gender (AOR 1.52; 95% CI [1.16, 2.01]) had increased odds of OAT receipt. Patients who received non-OAT opioids (AOR 0.53; 95% CI [0.46, 0.61]) or surgical procedures (AOR 0.75; 95% CI [0.57, 0.99]) had decreased odds of OAT receipt. Large-sized (AOR = 2.0; 95% CI [1.39, 3.00]) and medium-sized (AOR = 1.9; 95% CI [1.33, 2.70]) hospitals were more likely to provide OAT.Conclusions In a sample of VHA inpatient medical admissions, OAT delivery was infrequent, varied across the health system, and was associated with specific patient and hospital characteristics. Policy and educational interventions should promote hospital-based OAT delivery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-020-05815-0

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Few hospital patients receive SUD treatment services.

    “yet few hospital patients receive SUD treatment services.4,21,22”

    From Assessment of Annual Cost of Substance Use Disorder in US Hospitals (2021) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Discussion reports that only 15% of hospitalized VHA patients with OUD received opioid agonist therapy during admission. This supports low receipt of one SUD treatment in that group, but the claim extends to SUD treatment services generally and to hospital patients beyond the studied population. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Car [computer program]. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Priest, K. C., Lovejoy, T. I., Englander, H., Shull, S., & McCarty, D.
Affiliations
  • Portland State University (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Portland VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Priest, Kelsey C.
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2020-04-14
Volume
35
Issue
8
Pages
2365-2374
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W3015890779
Cited by
72
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3
FWCI
6.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (F30 DA044700UG, R33 DA035640, UG1 DA015815)
  • Greenlick Family Scholarship Fund
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (IK2HX001516)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
opioid substitution therapy, opioid use disorder, methadone, buprenorphine, hospitalization, Veterans Health Administration, opioid withdrawal management, linkage to care, hospital size, opioid prescribing, veterans, surgical procedures, gender differences, hospital-level variation, substance use disorder treatment access
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Analgesics, Opioid, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Opioid-Related Disorders, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Veterans Health, Opiate Substitution Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review