Cited by 34Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and EducationHealthcare Quality and Management

Integration of improvement and implementation science in practice-based research networks: a longitudinal, comparative case study

Open access
Davis, Melinda M., Gunn, Rose, Kenzie, Erin, Dickinson, Caitlin, Conway, Cullen, Chau, Alex, Michaels, LeAnn, Brantley, Steven +2 more·2021·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Implementation science (IS) and quality improvement (QI) inhabit distinct areas of scholarly literature, but are often blended in practice. Because practice-based research networks (PBRNs) draw from both traditions, their experience could inform opportunities for strategic IS-QI alignment. Objective To systematically examine IS, QI, and IS/QI projects conducted within a PBRN over time to identify similarities, differences, and synergies. Design Longitudinal, comparative case study of projects conducted in the Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network (ORPRN) from January 2007 to January 2019. Approach We reviewed documents and conducted staff interviews. We classified projects as IS, QI, IS/QI, or other using established criteria. We abstracted project details (e.g., objective, setting, theoretical framework) and used qualitative synthesis to compare projects by classification and to identify the contributions of IS and QI within the same project. Key results Almost 30% (26/99) of ORPRN's projects included IS or QI elements; 54% (14/26) were classified as IS/QI. All 26 projects used an evidence-based intervention and shared many similarities in relation to objective and setting. Over half of the IS and IS/QI projects used randomized designs and theoretical frameworks, while no QI projects did. Projects displayed an upward trend in complexity over time. Project used a similar number of practice change strategies; however, projects classified as IS predominantly employed education/training while all IS/QI and most QI projects used practice facilitation. Projects including IS/QI elements demonstrated the following contributions: QI provides the mechanism by which the principles of IS are operationalized in order to support local practice change and IS in turn provides theories to inform implementation and evaluation to produce generalizable knowledge. Conclusions Our review of projects conducted over a 12-year period in one PBRN demonstrates key synergies for IS and QI. Strategic alignment of IS/QI within projects may help improve care quality and bridge the research-practice gap.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-021-06610-1

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, M. M., Gunn, R., Kenzie, E., Dickinson, C., Conway, C., Chau, A., Michaels, L., Brantley, S., Check, D. K., & Elder, N.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Davis, Melinda M.
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2021-04-14
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
1503-1513
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W3154145957
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
5.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  • Informed Medical Decisions Foundation
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R18 HS027080)
  • National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research
  • National Cancer Institute (K07CA211971)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
implementation science, quality improvement, practice-based research networks, rural primary care, research-practice gap, practice facilitation, education and training, evidence-based interventions, implementation theory
MeSH terms
Implementation Science, Humans, Oregon, Quality of Health Care, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review