Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field

Schoolman, Ethan D., Guest, Jeremy S., Bush, Kathleen F., Bell, Andrew R.·2012·Sustainability Science

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11625-011-0139-z

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Bäckstrand K (2003) Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Glob Environ Politics 3:24–41 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bailey KD (1983) Sociological entropy theory: toward a statistical and verbal congruence. Qual Quant 18:113–133 · DOI
  3. Becher T, Trowler PR (2001) Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Philadelphia, PA
  4. Bruhn JG (1995) Beyond discipline: creating a culture for interdisciplinary research. Integr Physiol Behav Sci 30:331–341 · DOI
  5. Butler D (1998) Interdisciplinary research ‘being stifled’. Nature 396:202 · doi:10.1038/24217
  6. Characklis GW, Adriaens P, Braden JB, Davis J, Hamilton B, Hughes JB, Small MJ, Wolfe J (2011) Increasing the role of economics in environmental research (or moving beyond the mindset that economics = accounting). Environ Sci Technol 45:6235–6236 · doi:10.1021/es202128s
  7. Clark WC (2007) Sustainability science: a room of its own. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(6):1737–1738 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8059–8061 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Costanza R, Stern D, Fisher B, He L, Ma C (2004) Influential publications in ecological economics: a citation analysis. Ecol Econ 50:261–292 · DOI
  10. Elkington J (1998) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of the 21st century. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island
  11. Elsevier (2010) Bibliometrics. Retrieved December 12, 2010, from http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/editors.editors/biblio
  12. Fujigaki Y, Leydesdorff L (2000) Quality control and validation boundaries in a triple helix of university-industry-government: “Mode 2” and the future of university research. Soc Sci Inform 39:635–655 · doi:10.1177/053901800039004004
  13. Gill J (2005) An entropy measure of uncertainty in vote choice. Elect Stud 24:371–392 · DOI
  14. Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4(5):390–405 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Janssen MA (2007) An update on the scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability, and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Ecol Soc 12:9 · DOI
  16. Janssen MA, Schoon ML, Ke W, Börner K (2006) Scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Glob Environ Change 16(3):240–252 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Jerneck A, Olsson L, Ness B, Anderberg S, Baier M, Clark E, Hickler T, Hornborg A, Kronsell A, Lövbrand E, Persson J (2011) Structuring sustainability science. Sustain Sci 6:69–82 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Kajikawa Y (2008) Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustain Sci 3:215–239 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Kajikawa Y, Ohno J, Takeda Y, Matsushima K, Komiyama H (2007) Creating an academic landscape of sustainability science: an analysis of the citation network. Sustain Sci 2(2):221–231 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Kastenhofer K, Rammel C (2005) Obstacles to and potentials of the societal implementation of sustainable development: a comparative analysis of two case studies. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 1(2):5–13
  21. Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC, Grübler A, Huntley B, Jäger J, Jodha NS, Kasperson RE, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H, Moore B III, O’Riordan T, Svedin U (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292(5517):641–642 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Kaufman S, Kwon E, Krishnan N, Castaldi M, Themelis N (2008) Use of statistical entropy and life cycle analysis to evaluate global warming potential of waste management systems. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual North American Waste-to-Energy Conference (NAWTEC 16), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, May 2008, pp 107–112 · doi:10.1115/nawtec16-1915
  23. Kim KH, Jeon BJ, Jung HS, Lu W, Jones J (2011) Effective employment brand equity through sustainable competitive advantage, marketing strategy, and corporate image. J Bus Res (in press) · DOI
  24. Koehler DA, Hecht AD (2006) Sustainability, well being, and environmental protection: perspectives and recommendations from an Environmental Protection Agency forum. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 2(2):22–28
  25. Komiyama H, Takeuchi K (2006) Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustain Sci 1:1–6 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Leydesdorff L, Schank T (2008) Dynamic animations of journal maps: indicators of structural changes and interdisciplinary developments. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 59:1810–1818 · DOI
  27. Leydesdorff L, Moya-Anegón FD, Guerrero-Bote VP (2010) Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data: a comparison with the Journal Citation Reports of the ISI. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 61:352–369 · DOI
  28. Ma C, Stern DI (2006) Environmental and ecological economics: a citation analysis. Ecol Econ 58:491–506 · DOI
  29. Metzger N, Zare RN (1999) Interdisciplinary research: from belief to reality. Science 283(5402):642–643 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Nakamura H, Suzuki S, Hironori T, Kajikawa Y, Sakata I (2011) Citation lag analysis in supply chain research. Scientometrics 87:221–232 · doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0341-x
  31. Nelson B (2011) Interdisciplinary studies: seeking the right toolkit. Nature 476:115–117 · doi:10.1038/nj7358-115a
  32. Nyhus PJ, Westley FR, Lacy RC, Miller PS (2002) A role for natural resource social science in biodiversity risk assessment. Soc Nat Resour 15(10):923–932 · doi:10.1080/08941920290107657
  33. Office of Government Commerce (OGC) (2007) Achieving excellence in construction procurement guide: sustainability. HM Treasury, London
  34. Paternoster R, Brame R, Mazerolle P, Piquero A (1998) Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology 36:859–866 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Porter AL, Chubin DE (1985) An indicator of cross-disciplinary research. Scientometrics 8(3–4):161–176 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Porter AL, Rafols I (2009) Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics 81:719–745 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Porter AL, Roessner JD, Cohen AS, Perreault M (2006) Interdisciplinary research: meaning, metrics and nurture. Res Eval 15:187–195 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Porter AL, Cohen AS, Roessner JD, Perreault M (2007) Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics 72:117–147 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Porter AL, Roessner JD, Heberger AE (2008) How interdisciplinary is a given body of research? Res Eval 17:273–282 · DOI
  40. Qian C, Chan C-Y, Yung K-L (2011) Reaching a destination earlier by starting later: revisited. Transport Res E Log Trans Rev 47:641–647 · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2011.01.002
  41. Rafols I, Meyer M (2010) Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics 82:263–287 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Sá CM (2008) ‘Interdisciplinary strategies’ in U.S. research universities. High Educ 55(5):537–552 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Swart RJ, Raskin P, Robinson J (2004) The problem of the future: sustainability science and scenario analysis. Glob Environ Chang 14:137–146 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Tomov DT, Mutafov HG (1996) Comparative indicators of interdisciplinarity in modern science. Scientometrics 37:267–278 · DOI
  45. van Leeuwen T, Tijssen R (2000) Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows. Res Eval 9:183–187 · doi:10.3152/147154400781777241
  46. Wiek A, Withycombe L, Redman C, Mills SB (2011) Moving forward on competence in sustainability research and problem solving. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 53:3–13 · DOI
  47. Willard B (2002) The sustainability advantage: seven business case benefits of a triple bottom line. New Society Publishers, New York
  48. Yarime M, Takeda Y, Kajikawa Y (2010) Towards institutional analysis of sustainability science: a quantitative examination of the patterns of research collaboration. Sustain Sci 5(1):115–125 · DOI

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Schoolman, E. D., Guest, J. S., Bush, K. F., & Bell, A. R.
Venue
Sustainability Science
Published
2011-10-08
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
67-80
ISSN
  • 1862-4057 (ISSN-L)
  • 1862-4065
OpenAlex
W2008024582
Cited by
258
References
3
FWCI
21.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11625-011-0139-z
The paper
Schoolman, E. D., Guest, J. S., Bush, K. F., & Bell, A. R. (2012). How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field. Sustainability Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0139-z

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.