Cited by 16Neurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 289 of the 289 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mouse models of neurodegenerative disease: preclinical imaging and neurovascular component

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases represent great challenges for basic science and clinical medicine because of their prevalence, pathologies, lack of mechanism-based treatments, and impacts on individuals. Translational research might contribute to the study of neurodegenerative diseases. The mouse has become a key model for studying disease mechanisms that might recapitulate in part some aspects of the corresponding human diseases. Neurodegenerative disorders are very complicated and multifactorial. This has to be taken in account when testing drugs. Most of the drugs screening in mice are very difficult to be interpretated and often useless. Mouse models could be condiderated a 'pathway models', rather than as models for the whole complicated construct that makes a human disease. Non-invasive in vivo imaging in mice has gained increasing interest in preclinical research in the last years thanks to the availability of high-resolution single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET), high field Magnetic resonance, Optical Imaging scanners and of highly specific contrast agents. Behavioral test are useful tool to characterize different animal models of neurodegenerative pathology. Furthermore, many authors have observed vascular pathological features associated to the different neurodegenerative disorders. Aim of this review is to focus on the different existing animal models of neurodegenerative disorders, describe behavioral tests and preclini…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11682-017-9770-3

Cites

289 of 289 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 289 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dehghan, S., Mohajeri, M., & Javan, M. (2016). Animal models of multiple sclerosis. 5th Tehran IBRO School of Neuroscience, Chap. 1, pp. 3–16.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 16

Metadata

Authors
Albanese, S., Greco, A., Auletta, L., & Mancini, M.
Affiliations
  • CEINGE Biotecnologie Avanzate Franco Salvatore (Italy) (IT)
  • Institute of Biostructure and Bioimaging (IT)
Corresponding author
Greco, Adelaide
Venue
Brain Imaging and Behavior
Published
2017-10-26
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
1160-1196
ISSN
  • 1931-7557 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-7565
OpenAlex
W2766657139
Cited by
16
References
289
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Imaging and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research in the framework of PRIN (2010XE5L2R_004)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
neurodegenerative diseases, mouse model, small animal imaging, vascular pathology, behavioral tests, drug screening, in vivo imaging, contrast media, translational research
MeSH terms
Neurovascular Coupling, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review