CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 64

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Invariance and Meaningfulness in Phenotype spaces

Huttegger, Simon M., Mitteroecker, Philipp·2011·Evolutionary Biology
DOI 10.1007/s11692-011-9123-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11692-011-9123-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

  • On the Theory of Scales of Measurement

    Stevens, S. S. (1946) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.103.2684.677 · Cited by 4,761 · cited 1×

    “Stevens (1946) proposed a classification of psychological measurement scales that has immediate consequences for the problem of meaningfulness, for it identifies scales like ordinal scales or ratio scales with particular groups of transformations.”
    Background

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. Adams, D., Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. E. (2004). Geometric morphometrics: Ten years of progress following the “revolution”. Italian Journal of Zoology, 71(9), 5–16. · DOI
  2. Arnold, S. J., Bürger, R., Hohenlohe, P. A., Ajie, B. C., & Jones, A. G. (2008). Understanding the evolution and stability of the G-matrix. Evolution, 62, 2451–2461. · DOI
  3. Arnold, S. J., Pfrender, M. E., & Jones, A. G. (2001). The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution. Genetica, 112–113, 9–32. · DOI
  4. Blackith, R. E., & Reyment, R. A. (1971). Multivariate morphometrics. New York: Academic Press.
  5. Bookstein, F. L. (1991). Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and biology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Busemann, H. (1955). The geometry of geodesics. New York: Academic Press.
  7. Cain, A. J., & Harrison, G. A. (1960). Phyletic weighting. Proceedings of the Zoological Society London, 135, 1–31. · DOI
  8. Coquerelle, M., Bookstein, F. L., Braga, J., Halazonetis, D. J., Weber, G. W., & Mitteroecker, P. (in press). Sexual dimorphism of the human mandible and its association with dental development. American Journal of Physical Anthropology.
  9. Dryden, I. L., & Mardia, K. (1998). Statistical shape analysis. New York: Wiley.
  10. Falconer, D. S., & Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics. Essex, UK: Longman.
  11. Fontana, W., & Schuster, P. (1998a). Continuity in evolution: On the nature of transitions. Science, 280, 1451–1455. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Fontana, W., & Schuster, P. (1998b). Shaping space: The possible and the attainable in RNA genotype-phenotype mapping. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 194, 491–515. · DOI
  13. Foote, M. (1997). The evolution of morphological diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28, 129–152. · DOI
  14. Frank, S. A., & Smith, D. E. (2010). Measurement invariance, entropy, and probability. Entropy, 12, 289–303. · DOI
  15. Gunz, P., Bookstein, F. L., Mitteroecker, P., Stadlmayr, A., Seidler, H., & Weber, G. W. (2009). Early modern human diversity suggests subdivided population structure and a complex out-of-africa scenario. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106(15), 6094–6098. · DOI
  16. Hall, B. K. (2005). Bones and cartilage: Developmental skeletal biology. San Diego: Academic Press.
  17. Hallgrimsson, B., & Hall, B. K. (2005). Variation: A central concept in biology. New York: Elsevier.
  18. Hilbert, D. (1899). Grundlagen der Geometrie. Stuttgart: Teubner.
  19. Hölder, O. (1901). Die Axiome der Quantität und die Lehre vom Maß. Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig. Mathematisch-Physikalische Classe, 53, 1–64.
  20. Jolicoeur, P. (1963). The multivariate generalization of the allometry equation. Biometrics, 19, 497–499. · DOI
  21. Kendall, D. G. (1984). Shape manifolds, Procrustean metrics and complex projective spaces. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 16(2), 81–121. · DOI
  22. Klein, F. (1872). Vergleichende Betrachtungen über neuere geometrische Forschungen. Erlangen: Verlag von Andreas Deichert.
  23. Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1971). Foundations of measurement vol I. Additive and polynomial representations. San Diego, CA: Academic Press (reprinted by Dover 2007).
  24. Lande, R. (1979). Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain-body size allometry. Evolution, 33, 402–416. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Lele, S. R., & McCulloch, C. E. (2002). Invariance, identifiability, and morphometrics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 796–806. · DOI
  26. Luce, R. D., Krantz, D. H., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1990). Foundations of measurement vol III. Representation, axiomatization, and invariance. San Diego, CA: Academic Press (reprinted by Dover 2007).
  27. Lynch, M., & Walsh, B. (1998). Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
  28. Mahalanobis, P. C. (1936). On a generalised distance in statistics. Proceedings of the National Institute of Science, India, 2, 49–55.
  29. Marcus, L. F. (1990). Traditional morphometrics. In F. J. Rohlf & F. L. Bookstein (Eds.), Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop (pp. 77–122). Ann Arbor, Michigan: Univ. Michigan Museums.
  30. Marcus, L. F., Hingst-Zaher, E., & Zaher, H. (2000). Application of landmark morphometrics to skulls representing the orders of living mammals. Hystrix, Italian J. Mammology, 11(1), 27–47.
  31. Mardia, K. V., Kent, J. T., & Bibby, J. M. (1979). Multivariate analysis. London: Academic Press.
  32. Maynard Smith, J. (1970). Natural selection and the concept of a protein space. Nature, 225, 563–564. · DOI
  33. McGhee, G. R. (1999). Theoretical morphology: The concept and its applications. New York: Columbia University Press.
  34. Mitteroecker, P. (2009). The developmental basis of variational modularity: Insights from quantitative genetics, morphometrics, and developmental biology. Evolutionary Biology, 36, 377–385. · DOI
  35. Mitteroecker, P., & Bookstein, F. (2009). The ontogenetic trajectory of the phenotypic covariance matrix, with examples from craniofacial shape in rats and humans. Evolution, 63(3), 727–737. · DOI
  36. Mitteroecker, P., & Bookstein, F. (2011). Classification, linear discrimination, and the visualization of selection gradients in modern morphometrics. Evolutionary Biology, 38, 100–114. · DOI
  37. Mitteroecker, P., & Bookstein, F. L. (2007). The conceptual and statistical relationship between modularity and morphological integration. Systematic Biology, 56(5), 818–836. · DOI
  38. Mitteroecker, P., & Gunz, P. (2009). Advances in geometric morphometrics. Evolutionary Biology, 36, 235–247. · DOI
  39. Mitteroecker, P., Gunz, P., & Bookstein, F. L. (2005). Heterochrony and geometric morphometrics: A comparison of cranial growth in pan paniscus versus pan troglodytes. Evolution & Development, 7(3), 244–258. · DOI
  40. Mitteroecker, P., Gunz, P., Bernhard, M., Schaefer, K., & Bookstein, F. L. (2004). Comparison of cranial ontogenetic trajectories among great apes and humans. Journal of Human Evolution, 46, 679–697. · DOI
  41. Mitteroecker, P., & Huttegger, S. M. (2009). The concept of morphospaces in evolutionary and developmental biology: Mathematics and metaphors. Biological Theory, 4(1), 54–67. · DOI
  42. Narens, L. (2002). Theories of meaningfulness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  43. Pie, M. R. & Weitz, J. S. (2005). A null model of morphospace occupation. American Naturalist, 166(1), E1–13. · DOI
  44. Polly, P. D., & McLeod, N. (2008). Locomotion in fossil carnivora: An application of eigensurface analysis for morphometric comparison of 3D surfaces. Palaeontologia Electronica, 11(2), 10A:13p.
  45. Raup, D. M. (1966). Geometric analysis of shell coiling: General problems. Journal of Paleontology, 40, 1178–1190.
  46. Raup, D. M., & Michelson, A. (1965). Theoretical morphology of the coiled shell. Science, 147, 1294–1295. · DOI
  47. Rohlf, F. J. (1999). Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. Journal of Classification, 16, 197–223. · DOI
  48. Rohlf, F. J., & Sokal, R. (1965). Coefficients of correlation and distance in numerical taxonomy. University of Kansas Science Bulletin, 45, 3–27.
  49. Roy, K., & Foote, M. (1997). Morphological approaches to measuring biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 12(7), 277–281. · DOI
  50. Schaefer, K., Lauc, T., Mitteroecker, P., Gunz, P., & Bookstein, F. L. (2006). Dental arch asymmetry in an isolated Adriatic community. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 129(1), 132–142. · DOI
  51. Schindel, D. E. (1990). Unoccupied morphospace and the coiled geometry of gastropods: Architectural constraints or geometric covariation? In R. A. Ross, & W. D. Allmon (Eds.), Causes of Evolution (pp. 270–304). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  52. Slice, D. E. (2001). Landmark coordinates aligned by Procrustes analysis do not lie in Kendall’s shape space. Systematic Biology, 50(1), 141–149. · DOI
  53. Sneath, P. H. A., & Sokal, R. R. (1973). Numerical taxonomy: The principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
  54. Sokal, R. (1961). Distance as a measure of taxonomic similarity. Systematic Zoology, 10, 70–79. · DOI
  55. Sokal, R. R., & Sneath, P. H. A. (1963). Principles of numerical taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
  56. Stadler, B. M. R., Stadler, P. F., Shpak, M., & Wagner, G. P. (2002). Recombination spaces, metrics, and pretopologies. Zeitschrift für physikalische Chemie, 216, 217–274. · DOI
  57. Stadler, B. M. R., Stadler, P. F., Wagner, G. P., & Fontana, W. (2001). The topology of the possible: Formal spaces underlying patterns of evolutionary change. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 213, 241–274. · DOI
  58. Suppes, P., Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., & Tversky, A. (1989). Foundations of measurement Vol II. Geometrical, threshold and probabilistic representations. San Diego, CA: Academic Press (reprinted by Dover 2007).
  59. von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  60. Wills, M. A. (2001). Morphological disparity: A primer. In J. M. Adrain, G. D. Edgecombe, & B. S. Lieberman (Eds.), Fossils, phylogeny, and form—An analytical approach. New York: Kluwer.
  61. Wright, S. (1932). The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proceedings of the sixth international congress of genetics, 1, 356–366.
  62. Zelditch, M. L., Swiderski, D., Sheets, D. S., & Fink, W. L. (2004). Geometric morphometrics for biologists. San Diego: Elsevier.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Huttegger, S. M., & Mitteroecker, P.
Venue
Evolutionary Biology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2011-05-14
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
335-351
ISSN
  • 0071-3260
  • 1934-2845
DOI
10.1007/s11692-011-9123-x
Cited by
64
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review