The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hybridization Promotes Evolvability in African Cichlids: Connections Between Transgressive Segregation and Phenotypic Integration
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Empirical studies show that transgression occurs in a wide range of hybridizing animal taxa, including sculpins (Czypionka et al. 2012), African cichlids (Parsons et al. 2011), land snails (Chiba 2005), bats (Larsen et al. 2010), salamander (Dittrich-Reed and Fitzpatrick 2013), dolphins (Amaral et al. 2014), and copepods (Pritchard et al. 2012).”
From Morphological Variation in Wild Marmosets (Callithrix penicillata and C. geoffroyi) and Their Hybrids (2014) · cites this paper as Parsons et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“These cichlid and mouse data show that release from evolutionary constraints of phenotypic traits can occur in the F2 generation and then continue in later hybrid generations.”
From Morphological Variation in Wild Marmosets (Callithrix penicillata and C. geoffroyi) and Their Hybrids (2014) · cites this paper as Parsons et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“It has been suggested and evidenced that hybridization may release evolutionary constraints on phenotypic integration, affecting not only variation in traits but also the relationship between traits (e.g., head shape in African cichlids, Parsons et al. 2011; modularity in mouse mandible, Renaud et al. 2012).”
From Morphological Variation in Wild Marmosets (Callithrix penicillata and C. geoffroyi) and Their Hybrids (2014) · cites this paper as Parsons et al. 2011
Citations
Cites
Extensions of the procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks
Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. (1990) · Systematic Zoology · doi:10.2307/2992207 · Cited by 4,289
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 74
- Ackermann, R. R., Rogers, J., & Cheverud, J. M. (2005). What it means morphologically to be a hybrid: Evidence from known-pedigree baboons. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, (Supp) 40, 65.
- Ackermann, R., Rogers, J., & Cheverud, J. (2006). Identifying the morphological signatures of hybridization in primate and human evolution. Journal of Human Evolution, 51, 632–645. · DOI · Paper page
- Albertson, R. C. (2008). Morphological divergence predicts habitat partitioning in a Lake Malawi cichlid species complex. Copeia, 2008, 690–699. · DOI
- Albertson, R. C., & Kocher, T. D. (2005). Genetic architecture sets limits on transgressive segregation in hybrid cichlid fishes. Evolution, 59, 686–690. · DOI
- Albertson, R. C., Streelman, J. T., & Kocher, T. D. (2003). Directional selection has shaped the oral jaw apparatus of Lake Malawi cichlid fishes. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 100, 5252–5257. · DOI
- Anderson, D. W., & Evans, B. J. (2009). Regulatory evolution of a duplicated heterodimer across species and tissues of allopolyploid clawed frogs (Xenopus). Journal of Molecular Evolution, 68, 236–247. · DOI
- Armbruster, W. S., Pelabon, C., Hansen, T. F., & Mulder, C. P. H. (2004). Floral integration, modularity, and accuracy: Distinguishing complex adaptations from genetic constraints. In M. Pigliucci & K. A. Preston (Eds.), Phenotypic integration: Studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes (pp. 23–49). Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI
- Berg, R. L. (1960). The ecological significance of correlation pleiades. Evolution, 14, 171–180. · DOI
- Bookstein, F. L. (1991). Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Bullini, L., & Nascetti, G. (1990). Speciation by hybridization in phasmids and other insects. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 68, 1747–1760. · DOI
- Cheverud, J. (1988). A comparison of genetic and phenotypic correlations. Evolution, 42, 958–968. · DOI
- Cheverud, J. (2004). Modular pleiotropic effects of quantitative trait loci on morphological traits. In G. Schlosser & G. Wagner (Eds.), Modularity in development and evolution (pp. 132–153). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Cheverud, J. M., Wagner, G. P., & Dow, M. M. (1989). Methods for the comparative analysis of variation patterns. Systematic Zoology, 38, 201–213. · DOI
- Clausen, J., & Heisey, W. M. (1960). The balance between coherence and variation in evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 46, 494–506. · DOI
- Cohen, A. S., Stone, J. R., Beuning, K. R. M., Park, L. E., Reinthal, P. N., Dettman, D., et al. (2007). Ecological consequences of early Late Pleistocene megadroughts in tropical Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 104, 16422–16427. · DOI
- Conner, J. K. (2002). Genetic mechanisms of floral trait correlations in a natural population. Nature, 420, 407–410. · DOI
- Cooper, W. J., Parsons, K., McIntyre, A., Kern, B., McGee-Moore, A., & Albertson, R. C. (2010). Bentho—Pelagic divergence of cichlid feeding architecture was prodigious and consistent during multiple adaptive radiations within African rift-lakes. PLoS ONE, 5, e9551. · DOI
- Cooper, W. J., & Westneat, M. W. (2009). Form and function of damselfish skulls: Rapid and repeated evolution into a limited number of trophic niches. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 9, 24. · DOI
- Danley, P. D., & Kocher, T. D. (2001). Speciation in rapidly diverging systems: Lessons from Lake Malawi. Molecular Ecology, 10, 1075–1086. · DOI
- Dobzhansky, T. (1940). Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. American Naturalist, 74, 312–321. · DOI
- Ehrlich, P. R., & Wilson, E. O. (1991). Biodiversity studies: Science and policy. Science, 253, 758–762. · DOI · Paper page
- Futuyma, D. J. (2010). Evolutionary constraint and ecological consequences. Evolution, 64, 1865–1884. · DOI
- Genner, M. J., Knight, M. E., Haesler, M. P., & Turner, G. F. (2010). Establishment and expansion 25 of Lake Malawi rock fish populations after a dramatic Late Pleistocene lake level rise. Molecular Ecology, 19, 170–182. · DOI
- Gilliard, E. T. (1959). The ecology of hybridization in New Guinea Honeyeaters (Aves). American Museum Novitates, 1937, 1–26.
- Grant, B. R., & Grant, P. R. (1979). Darwin’s Finches: population variation and sympatric speciation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 76, 2359–2363. · DOI · Paper page
- Grant, P. R., & Grant, B. R. (1992). Hybridization in bird species. Science, 256, 193–197. · DOI
- Grant, P. R., & Grant, B. R. (1994). Phenotypic and genetic effects of hybridization in Darwin’s finches. Evolution, 48, 297–316. · DOI
- Hallgrimsson, B., Jamniczky, H., Young, N. M., Rolian, C., Parsons, T. E., Boughner, J. C., et al. (2009). Deciphering the palimpsest: Studying the relationship between morphological integration and phenotypic covariation. Evolutionary Biology, 36, 355–376. · DOI
- Herrera, C. M., Cerda, X., Garcia, M. B., Guitian, J., Medrano, M., Rey, P. J., et al. (2002). Floral integration, phenotypic covariance structure and pollinator variation in bumblebee-pollinated Helleborus foetidus. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 15, 108–121. · DOI
- Jastrebski, C. J., & Robinson, B. W. (2004). Natural selection and the evolution of replicated trophic polymorphisms in pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus). Evolutionary Ecology Research, 6, 285–305.
- Joyce, D. A., Lunt, D. H., Genner, M.J., Turner, G.F., Bills, R., & Seehausen, O. (2011). Repeated colonization and hybridization in Lake Malawi cichlids. Current Biology, 21, R108–R109. · DOI
- Lewontin, R. C., & Birch, L. C. (1966). Hybridization as a source of variation for adaptation to new environments. Evolution, 20, 315–336. · DOI
- Loh, Y. H. E., Katz, L. S., Mims, M. C., Kocher, T. D., Yi, S. V., et al. (2008). Comparative analysis reveals signatures of differentiation amid genomic polymorphism in Lake Malawi cichlids. Genome Biology, 9, 110. · DOI
- Manley, B. F. J. (1994). Multivariate statistical methods: A primer. St. Edmonds, Suffolk: Chapman and Hall, Bury.
- Maynard Smith, J. M., Burian, R., Kauffman, S., Alberch, P., Campbell, J., Goodwin, B., et al. (1985). Developmental constraints and evolution. Quarterly Review of Biology, 60, 265–287. · DOI
- Mayr, E. (1942). Systematics and the origin of species. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Mayr, E. (1963). Animal species and evolution. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press. · DOI · Paper page
- McElroy, D. M., & Kornfield, I. (1993). Novel jaw morphology in hybrids between Pseudotropheus zebra and Labeotropheus fuelleborni (Teleostei: Cichlidae) from Lake Malawi, Africa. Copeia, 1993, 933–945. · DOI
- Murren, C. J. (2002). Phenotypic integration in plants. Plant Species Biology, 17, 89–99. · DOI
- Neff, B. D. (2004). Stabilizing selection on genomic divergence in a wild fish population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 101, 2381–2385. · DOI
- Orr, H. A. (1998). Testing natural selection versus genetic drift in phenotypic evolution using quantitative trait locus data. Genetics, 149, 2099–2104. · DOI
- Parsons, K. J., & Robinson, B. W. (2006). Replicated evolution of integrated plastic responses during early adaptive divergence. Evolution, 60, 801–813. · DOI
- Parsons, K. J., & Robinson, B. W. (2007). Foraging performance of diet-induced morphotypes in pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus) favours resource polymorphism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 673–684. · DOI
- Pavlicev, M., Cheverud, J. M., & Wagner, G. P. (2011). Evolution of adaptive phenotypic variation patterns by direct selection for evolvability. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 278, 1903–1912. · DOI
- Pavlicev, M., Cheverud, J. M., & Wagner, G. P. (2009). Measuring morphological integration using eigenvalue variance. Evolutionary Biology, 36, 157–170. · DOI
- Pavličev, M., Kenney-Hun, J., Norgard, E., Roseman, C., Wolf, J., & Cheverud, J. (2008). Genetic variation in pleiotropy: Differential epistasis as a source of variation in the allometric relationship between long bone lengths and body weight. Evolution, 62, 199–213.
- Peres-Neto, P. R., & Jackson, D. A. (2001). How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test. Oecologia, 129, 169–178. · DOI
- Pigliucci, M. (2008). Is evolvability evolvable? Nature Reviews Genetics, 9, 75–82. · DOI
- Potts, B. M., & Reid, J. B. (1985). Analysis of a hybrid swarm between Eucalyptus risdonii Hook. f. and E. amygdalina Labill. Australian Journal of Botany, 33, 543–562. · DOI
- Ribbink, A. J., Marsh, A. C., Ribbink, C. C., & Sharp, B. J. (1983). A preliminary survey of the cichlid fishes of rocky habitats in Lake Malawi. South African Journal of Zoology, 18, 149–310. · DOI
- Rieseberg, L. H., Archer, M. A., & Wayne, R. K. (1999a). Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity, 83, 363–372. · DOI · Paper page
- Rieseberg, L. H., Whitton, J., & Gardner, K. (1999b). Hybrid zones and the genetic architecture of a barrier to gene flow between two sunflower species. Genetics, 152, 713–727. · DOI
- Rieseberg, L. H., Raymond, O., Rosenthal, D. M., Lai, Z., Livingstone, K., Nakazato, T., et al. (2003a). Major ecological transitions in wild sunflowers facilitated by hybridization. Science, 301, 1211–1216. · DOI
- Rieseberg, L. H., Widmer, A., Arntz, A. M., & Burke, J. M. (2003b). The genetic architecture necessary for transgressive segregation is common in both natural and domesticated populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, 358, 1141–1147. · DOI · Paper page
- Rohlf, F. J., & Marcus, L. F. (1993). A revolution in morphometrics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 8, 129–132. · DOI
- Ruber, L., Meyer, A., Sturmbauer, C., & Verheyen, E. (2001). Population structure in two sympatric species of the Tanganyika cichlid tribe Eretmodini: Evidence for introgression. Molecular Ecology, 10, 1207–1225. · DOI
- Salzburger, W., Baric, S., & Sturmbauer, C. (2002). Speciation via introgression hybridization in African cichlids? Molecular Ecology, 11, 619–625. · DOI
- Schlichting, C. D. (1989). Phenotypic integration and environmental change. BioScience, 39, 460–464. · DOI
- Schlichting, C. D., & Pigliucci, M. (1998). Phenotypic evolution: A reaction norm perspective. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
- Schluter, D. (1996). Ecological causes of adaptive radiation. American Naturalist, 148(Supplement), S40–S64. · DOI
- Seehausen, O. (2004). Hybridization and adaptive radiation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 198–207. · DOI · Paper page
- Sites, J. W., Peccinini-Seale, D. M., Moritz, C., Wright, J. W., & Brown, W. M. (1990). The evolutionary history of parthenogenetic Cnemidophorus lem- niscatus (Sauria: Teiidae). I. Evidence for hybrid origin. Evolution, 44, 906–921. · DOI
- Smith, P. F., Konings, A., & Kornfield, I. (2003). Hybrid origin of a cichlid population in Lake Malawi: Implications for genetic variation and species diversity. Molecular Ecology, 12, 2497–2507. · DOI
- Stebbins, G. L., Jr. (1959). The role of hybridization in evolution. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 103, 231–251.
- Stelkens, R. B., Schmid, C., Selz, O., & Seehausen, O. (2009). Phenotypic novelty in experimental hybrids is predicted by the genetic distance between species of cichlid fish. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 9, 283. · DOI
- Sturmbauer, C. (1998). Explosive speciation in cichlid fishes of the African Great Lakes: A dynamic model of adaptive radiation. Journal of Fish Biology, 53, 18–36. · DOI
- Sturmbauer, C., Baric, S., Salzburger, W., Rüber, L., & Verheyen, E. (2001). Lake level fluctuations synchronize genetic divergences of cichlid fishes in African lakes. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 18, 144–154. · DOI
- Via, S. (2009). Natural selection in action during speciation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 9939–9946. · DOI
- Vrijenhoek, R. C., Dawley, R. M., Cole, C. J., & Bogart, J. P. (1989). A list of the known unisexual vertebrates. In R. M. Dawley & J. P. Bogart (Eds.), Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates (pp. 19–23). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
- Wagner, G. P., & Altenberg, L. (1996). Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution, 50, 967–976. · DOI
- Young, K. A., Snoeks, J., & Seehausen, O. (2009). Morphological diversity and the roles of contingency, chance and determinism in African cichlid radiations. PLoS ONE, 4, e4740. · DOI
- Young, N. M., Wagner, G. P., & Hallgrimsson, B. (2010). Development and the evolvability of human limbs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107, 3401–3405.
- Zelditch, M. L., Swiderski, D. L., Sheets, H. D., & Fink, W. L. (2004). Geometric morphometrics for biologists: A primer. NY: Elsevier.
- Zelditch, M. L., Wood, A. R., & Swiderski, D. L. (2009). Building developmental integration into functional systems: Function-induced integration of mandibular shape. Evolutionary Biology, 36, 71–87. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rapid hybrid speciation in Darwin’s finches
Lamichhaney, S., Han, F., Webster, M. T., Andersson, L., Grant, B. R., & Grant, P. R. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao4593 · Cited by 440
Fuzessy, L. F., Silva, I. D. O., Malukiewicz, J., Silva, F. F. R., Pônzio, M. D. C., Boere, V., & Ackermann, R. R. (2014) · Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1007/s11692-014-9284-5 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Parsons, K. J., Son, Y. H., & Craig Albertson, R.
- Venue
- Evolutionary Biology
- Published
- 2011-06-14
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 306-315
- ISSN
- 0071-3260
- 1934-2845
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review