Cited by 83Animal Behavior and ReproductionAvian ecology and behaviorAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior

Darwin's finches: population variation and sympatric speciation

Open access
Grant, B. R., Grant, P. R.·1979·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The classical model of the adaptive radiation of Darwin's finches is one of repeated speciation in allopatry. Evidence presented here suggests that sympatric specification may have contributed to the radiation. On Isla Genovesa Geospiza conirostris displays several features that are consistent with a model of sympatric speciation. Males are polymorphic in song type. Those singing song A have significantly longer bills than those singing song B. The two groups of males forage in different ways that are functionally associated with the bill differences, particularly in the nonbreeding season when food is probably limiting. Territories of mated song A and song B males alternate in space, whereas territories of unmated males do not. This suggests that females can discriminate between males on the basis of song and position, and the pattern is consistent with a hypothesis of assortative mating within song groups. The population is therefore polymorphic; the morphs occupy different niches in which they may be separately regulated and they could be on the way to achieving full reproductive isolation through assortive mating. It is suggested that the population may oscillate between fission and fusion tendencies due to a changing selection regime in this variable and unpredictable environment. There is no evidence that one of the morphs originated allopatrically and then immigrated to Genovesa. The possibility of sympatric speciation being partly responsible for the adaptive radiatio…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.76.5.2359

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In most theoretical models of sympatric and parapatric speciation, divergent natural selection plays a dominant role.

    “In most theoretical models of sympatric and parapatric speciation, divergent natural selection plays a dominant role (Genner et al., 2007; Grant and Grant, 1979; Schluter, 2001; Wu, 2001; Wu and Ting, 2004).”

    From The molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae: a phenotypic perspective (2008) · cites this paper as Grant and Grant, 1979

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grant, B. R., & Grant, P. R.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1979-05
Volume
76
Issue
5
Pages
2359-2363
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2090460036
Cited by
83
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • University of Michigan
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Keywords
Darwin's finches, sympatric speciation, adaptive radiation, assortative mating, territoriality, foraging behavior, reproductive isolation, population cycles, allopatric speciation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review