CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 148

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transgressive Hybrids as Hopeful Monsters

Dittrich-Reed, Dylan R., Fitzpatrick, Benjamin M.·2013·Evolutionary Biology
DOI 10.1007/s11692-012-9209-0PMC PMC3655218
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11692-012-9209-0

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transgressive segregation drives the appearance of phenotypic novelty in hybridizing animal populations.

    “This type of research supports the hypothesis that transgressive segregation drives the appearance of phenotypic novelty in hybridizing animal populations (Dittrich-Reed and Fitzpatrick 2013), which in turn may fuel new adaptations and hybrid speciation (Seehausen 2004; Rieseberg et al. 2003).”

    From Morphological Variation in Wild Marmosets (Callithrix penicillata and C. geoffroyi) and Their Hybrids (2014) · cites this paper as Dittrich-Reed and Fitzpatrick 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Abbott, R. J., Hegarty, M. J., Hiscock, S. J., & Brennan, A. C. (2010). Homoploid hybrid speciation in action. Taxon, 59(5), 1375–1386. · DOI
  2. Arnold, M. L. (1997). Natural hybridization and evolution (p. 215). New York: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  3. Arnold, M. L. (2006). Evolution through genetic exchange. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Arnold, M. L., Ballerini, E. S., & Brothers, A. N. (2012). Hybrid fitness, adaptation and evolutionary diversification: Lessons learned from Louisiana Irises. Heredity, 108(3), 159–166. · DOI
  5. Arnold, M. L., Bulger, M. R., Burke, J. M., Hempel, A. L., & Williams, J. H. (1999). Natural hybridization: How low can you go and still be important? Ecology, 80, 371–381. · DOI
  6. Arnold, M. L., & Hodges, S. A. (1995). Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10, 67–71. · DOI
  7. Bateson, W. (1909). Heredity and variation in modern lights. In A. C. Seward (Ed.), Darwin and modern science (pp. 85–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Bateson, P. (1984). Sudden changes in ontogeny and phylogeny (pp. 155–166). Hillsdale, New Jersey & London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  9. Bateson, P. (2002). William Bateson: A biologist ahead of his time. Journal of Genetics, 81(2), 49–58. · DOI
  10. Brigandt, I., & Love, A. C. (2012). Conceptualizing evolutionary novelty: Moving beyond definitional debates. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B-Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 318B(6), 417–427. · DOI
  11. Burke, J. M., & Arnold, M. L. (2001). Genetics and the fitness of hybrids. Annual Review of Genetics, 35, 31–52. · DOI
  12. Charlesworth, B., Lande, R., & Slatkin, M. (1982). A neo-Darwinian commentary on macroevolution. Evolution, 36(3), 474–498. · DOI
  13. Coyne, J. A., & Orr, H. A. (2004). Speciation (p. 545). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Ass.
  14. Dobzhansky, T. (1937). Genetics and the origin of species. New York: Columbia University Press.
  15. Fitzpatrick, B. M. (2008). Hybrid dysfunction: Population genetic and quantitative genetic perspectives. American Naturalist, 171(4), 491–498. · DOI
  16. Fitzpatrick, B. M., Johnson, J. R., Kump, D. K., Smith, J. J., Voss, S. R., & Shaffer, H. B. (2010). Rapid spread of invasive genes into a threatened native species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(8), 3606–3610. · DOI
  17. Gavrilets, S. (1999). A dynamical theory of speciation on holey adaptive landscapes. American Naturalist, 154(1), 1–22. · DOI
  18. Gavrilets, S. (2004). Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton: Princeton University Press. · DOI
  19. Goldschmidt, R. (1933). Some aspects of evolution. Science, 78, 539–547. · DOI
  20. Goldschmidt, R. (1940). The material basis of evolution. London: Yale University Press, New Haven and Oxford University Press, p. xi + 436.
  21. Gompert, Z., Fordyce, J. A., Forister, M. L., Shapiro, A. M., & Nice, C. C. (2006). Homoploid hybrid speciation in an extreme habitat. Science, 314, 1923–1925. · DOI
  22. Grant, V. (1975). Genetics of flowering plants. New York: Columbia University Press, p. xiv + 514.
  23. Hill, W. G, (Ed.). (1984). Quantitative genetics. Part I. Explanation and analysis of continuous variation. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc., p. xi + 345.
  24. Johnson, J. R., Fitzpatrick, B. M., & Shaffer, H. B. (2010). Retention of low-fitness genotypes over six decades of admixture between native and introduced tiger salamanders. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10. · DOI
  25. Karrenberg, S., Lexer, C., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2007). Reconstructing the history of selection during homoploid hybrid speciation. American Naturalist, 169(6), 725–737. · DOI
  26. Lexer, C., Welch, M. E., Raymond, O., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2003). The origin of ecological divergence in Helianthus paradoxus (Asteraceae): Selection on transgressive characters in a novel hybrid habitat. Evolution, 57(9), 1989–2000. · DOI
  27. Lynch, M. (2007). The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 8597–8604. · DOI
  28. Mallet, J. (2007). Hybrid speciation. Nature, 446(7133), 279–283. · DOI
  29. Mayr, E. (1942). Systematics and the origin of species from the viewpoint of a zoologist (p. 334). New York: Columbia University Press.
  30. Mayr, E. (1954). Change of genetic environment and evolution. In J. S. Huxley, A. C. Hardy, & E. B. Ford (Eds.), Evolution as a process (pp. 157–180). London: Allen & Unwin.
  31. Meyer, A. (2002). Viewing life as cooperation. Nature, 418(6895), 275–276. · DOI
  32. Moczek, A. P. (2008). On the origins of novelty in development and evolution. BioEssays, 30(5), 432–447. · DOI
  33. Muller, H. J. (1942). Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biological Symposia, 6, 71–125.
  34. Muller, G. B., & Wagner, G. P. (1991). Novelty in evolution: Restructuring the concept. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 22, 229–256. · DOI
  35. Orr, H. A., & Turelli, M. (2001). The evolution of postzygotic isolation: Accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. Evolution, 56, 1085–1094. · DOI
  36. Parsons, K. J., Son, Y. H., & Albertson, R. C. (2011). Hybridization promotes evolvability in African Cichlids: Connections between transgressive segregation and phenotypic integration. Evolutionary Biology, 38(3), 306–315. · DOI · Paper page
  37. Pigliucci, M. (2008). What, if anything, is an evolutionary novelty? Philosophy of Science, 75(5), 887–898. · DOI
  38. Rieseberg, L. H., Archer, M. A., & Wayne, R. K. (1999). Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity, 83, 363–372. · DOI · Paper page
  39. Rieseberg, L. H., Kim, S. C., Randell, R. A., Whitney, K. D., Gross, B. L., Lexer, C., et al. (2007). Hybridization and the colonization of novel habitats by annual sunflowers. Genetica, 129(2), 149–165. · DOI
  40. Rieseberg, L. H., Raymond, O., Rosenthal, D. M., Lai, Z., Livingstone, K., Nakazato, T., et al. (2003). Major ecological transitions in wild sunflowers facilitated by hybridization. Science, 301(5637), 1211–1216. · DOI
  41. Rolfe, R. A., & Hurst, C. C. (1909). The orchid stud-book: An enumeration of hybrid orchids of artificial origin, with their parents, raisers, date of first flowering, references to descriptions and figures, and synonymy. With an historical introduction and 120 figures and a chapter on hybridising and raising orchids from seed. Kew, F. Leslie & co. · DOI
  42. Rosenthal, D. M., Rieseberg, L. H., & Donovan, L. A. (2005). Re-creating ancient hybrid species’ complex phenotypes from early-generation synthetic hybrids: Three examples using wild sunflowers. American Naturalist, 166(1), 26–41. · DOI
  43. Scascitelli, M., Cognet, M., & Adams, K. L. (2010). An Interspecific plant hybrid shows novel changes in parental splice forms of genes for splicing factors. Genetics, 184(4), 975–983. · DOI
  44. Schwarz, D., Matta, B. M., Shakir-Botteri, N. L., & McPheron, B. A. (2005). Host shift to an invasive plant triggers rapid animal hybrid speciation. Nature, 436(7050), 546–549. · DOI
  45. Shahid, M., Han, S., Yoell, H., & Xu, J. P. (2008). Fitness distribution and transgressive segregation across 40 environments in a hybrid progeny population of the human-pathogenic yeast Cryptococcus neoformans. Genome, 51(4), 272–281. · DOI
  46. Stelkens, R. B., Schmid, C., Selz, O., & Seehausen, O. (2009). Phenotypic novelty in experimental hybrids is predicted by the genetic distance between species of cichlid fish. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 9, 283–295. · DOI
  47. Stelkens, R., & Seehausen, O. (2009). Genetic distance between species predicts novel trait expression in their hybrids. Evolution, 63(4), 884–897. · DOI
  48. Turelli, M., & Orr, H. A. (2000). Dominance, epistasis, and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics, 154, 1663–1679. · DOI
  49. Ungerer, M. C., Baird, S. J. E., Pan, J., & Rieseberg, L. H. (1998). Rapid hybrid speciation in wild sunflowers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95(20), 11757–11762. · DOI
  50. Wagner, G. P., & Lynch, V. J. (2010). Evolutionary novelties. Current Biology, 20(2), R48–R52. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dittrich-Reed, D. R., & Fitzpatrick, B. M.
Venue
Evolutionary Biology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2012-11-20
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
310-315
ISSN
  • 0071-3260
  • 1934-2845
DOI
10.1007/s11692-012-9209-0
PMC
PMC3655218
Cited by
148
References
2
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review