Cited by 106Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesBody Contouring and SurgeryObesity and Health Practices

Support Group Meeting Attendance is Associated with Better Weight Loss

Orth, Whitney S., Madan, Atul K., Taddeucci, Raymond J., Coday, Mace, Tichansky, David S.·2008·Obesity Surgery

Abstract

Background Support group meetings (SGM) are assumed to be an integral part of success after bariatric surgery. This investigation studies the effect of SGM on weight loss as well as factors associated with attendance of SGM. It is our hypothesis that patients who attend SGM (ASGM) lose more weight than those patients who do not attend SGM (NASGM). Methods Postoperative bariatric patients completed a questionnaire regarding their opinions of SGM. Change in body mass index (BMI) was computed for each patient. The patients were then divided into two groups: ASGM and NASGM for data comparison. Results There were 46 patients in the investigation. Patients in the NASGM group tended to feel that SGM are not needed after bariatric surgery compared to the ASGM group (5.29 vs. 7.06; p = 0.07). Patients in the NASGM group tended to feel that they would lose the same amount of weight with or without attending SGM compared to the ASGM group (5.67 vs. 7.38; p = 0.07). There were no differences in distance to clinic nor in time to clinic between both groups. Gastric bypass patients in the ASGM group had a statistically significantly higher percent decrease in BMI than the patients in the NASGM group (42% vs. 32%; p Conclusion Patients in the ASGM group lose more weight than patients in the NASGM group. The importance of attending SGM should be incorporated in preoperative patient counseling and encouraged during postoperative follow-up visits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11695-008-9444-8

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-attenders were marginally (p = 0.07) more likely than attenders to think that support groups would have no effect on weight loss and to think that support groups are not needed post-surgery.

    “although non‐attenders were marginally (p = 0.07) more likely than attenders to think that support groups would have no effect on weight loss and to think that support groups are not needed post‐surgery.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orth, W. S., Madan, A. K., Taddeucci, R. J., Coday, M., & Tichansky, D. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Lincoln University - California (US)
Corresponding author
Madan, Atul K.
Venue
Obesity Surgery
Published
2008-02-20
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
391-394
ISSN
  • 0960-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-0428
OpenAlex
W2077586890
Cited by
106
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
bariatric surgery
MeSH terms
Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Obesity, Morbid, Patient Compliance, Self-Help Groups, Cohort Studies, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Health Care Surveys, Bariatric Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review