Cited by 47Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesBody Contouring and SurgeryObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prediction of Long-term Outcome after Gastric Bypass Surgery

Abstract

Background To investigate the predictability and sustainability of weight loss in gastric bypass (GBP) surgery after the first year, we conducted a 3-year follow-up of patients who had already been comprehensively studied preoperatively and after 1 year.Methods Preoperative data had been obtained for 131 morbidly obese patients on a 273-item interview and five psychological assessment instruments, and some of these data had been obtained again after a mean of 12.8 months. For this study, weight data were obtained on 79 patients at a mean of 3.2 years postoperatively.Results Over the 1-3 year interval, mean simple weight loss and simple BMI decrease were essentially zero, compared with 45.61 kg and 16.52 respectively over the 0-1 year interval. Further, the 0-1 year and 1-3 year losses were uncorrelated. Optimal predictor variables for 1-3 year loss included three preoperative measures (expectation of increased self-confidence, amount of informational support, and total coping skills) plus functional eating behaviors after 1 year. Together they showed a multiple correlation of .55 with weight loss and .55 with BMI change. These predictors differed from the predictors of change over 0-1 year, and they continued to be significant after controlling for several preoperative characteristics.Conclusions The factors influencing long-term continuing weight loss after GBP are different from those influencing initial loss, and involve positive characteristics such as skills, information, and expectations. The results suggest the importance of actively teaching such skills during the first postoperative year.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11695-008-9740-3

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Butcher JN, Dahlstrom WG, Graham J, et al. MMPI-2: manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1989.
  2. Jackson DN. Basic Personality Inventory: manual. Port Huron: Sigma Assessment Systems; 1989.
  3. Ruehlman LS, Lanyon RI, Karoly P. Multidimensional Health Profile: professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1998.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 47

Metadata

Authors
Lanyon, R. I., Maxwell, B. M., & Kraft, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Phoenix Houses of New England (US)
Corresponding author
Lanyon, Richard I.
Venue
Obesity Surgery
Published
2008-10-11
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
439-445
ISSN
  • 0960-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-0428
OpenAlex
W1984087480
Cited by
47
References
11
Citations by year
2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
gastric bypass, bariatric surgery
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Time Factors, Gastric Bypass, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review