Cited by 19Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesRegulation of Appetite and ObesityAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fasting Circulating Glicentin Increases After Bariatric Surgery

Open access

Abstract

Introduction Bariatric surgery including the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a well-established therapeutic option for patients with morbid or severe obesity. Metabolic modifications observed after bariatric surgery are thought to be, at least partly, linked to hormonal changes. While variation of several proglucagon-derived peptides during bariatric surgery is well documented, little is known about glicentin. The aim of this study was to investigate circulating glicentin variations after bariatric surgery.Material and methods Thirty patients eligible for bariatric surgery (18 RYGB and 12 LSG procedures) were prospectively included in the University Hospital of Nice. Clinical data and fasting biological parameters were recorded preoperatively, at 3, 6, and 12 months after bariatric surgery.Results The median age of patients was 51 years (35-56) with 33.3% men. Fasting glicentin concentration increased progressively after bariatric surgery from 6 months and was more marked at 12 months (14 ± 3.6 pmol/L at baseline vs 19.7 ± 2.7 pmol/L at 12 months for RYGB and 12.5 ± 1.4 vs 16.4 ± 1.8 pmol/L for LSG, respectively). Compared to preoperative values, the fold increase of glicentin at 12 months was 2 ± 0.2 in the RYGB group and 1.6 ± 0.3 in the LSG group. Glicentin variation after surgery did not correlate with anthropometric, glycemic, or lipid parameter modifications.Conclusion Fasting glicentin level increases after bariatric surgery suggesting the potential interest of this peptide as a player and/or a marker of physiological changes after bariatric surgery.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11695-016-2493-5

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Raffort, J., Panaïa-Ferrari, P., Lareyre, F., Bayer, P., Staccini, P., Fénichel, P., & Chinetti, G.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Université Côte d'Azur (FR)
Corresponding author
Chinetti, Giulia
Venue
Obesity Surgery
Published
2016-12-16
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
1581-1588
ISSN
  • 0960-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-0428
OpenAlex
W2563230223
Cited by
19
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Université Côte d'Azur
  • University Hospital of Nice
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
glicentin, bariatric surgery
MeSH terms
Adult, Fasting, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Prospective Studies, Bariatric Surgery, Glicentin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review