Cited by 1,032Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesMinimally Invasive Surgical TechniquesBody Contouring and Surgery

IFSO Worldwide Survey 2016: Primary, Endoluminal, and Revisional Procedures

Angrisani, Luigi, Santonicola, A., Iovino, P., Vitiello, A., Higa, K., Himpens, J., Buchwald, H., Scopinaro, N.·2018·Obesity Surgery

Abstract

Background and aim The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO), being a Federation of 62 national societies, is the ideal network to monitor the number and type of procedures at a global level. The IFSO survey, enriched with a special section on revisional procedures, aims to report the number and types of bariatric procedures performed worldwide in 2016 and analyzes the surgical trends from 2008 to 2016.Methods The 2016 IFSO Survey form was emailed to all IFSO societies. Each Society was requested to indicate the number and type of bariatric procedures performed in the country. Trend analyses from 2008 to 2016 were also performed.Results The total number of bariatric/metabolic procedures performed in 2016 was 685,874; 634,897 (92.6%) of which were primary and 50,977 were revisional (7.4%). Among the primary interventions, 609,897 (96%) were surgical and 25,359 (4%) were endoluminal. The most performed primary surgical bariatric/metabolic procedure was sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (N = 340,550; 53.6%), followed by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (N = 191,326; 30.1%), and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (N = 30,563; 4.8%).Conclusions In 2016, there was an increase in the total number both of surgical and endoluminal bariatric/metabolic procedures. Revisional procedures represent about 7% of the total bariatric interventions. SG remains the most performed surgical procedure in the world.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11695-018-3450-2

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Angrisani, L., Santonicola, A., Iovino, P., Vitiello, A., Higa, K., Himpens, J., Buchwald, H., & Scopinaro, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Salerno (IT)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Genoa (IT)
Corresponding author
Angrisani, Luigi
Venue
Obesity Surgery
Published
2018-08-18
Volume
28
Issue
12
Pages
3783-3794
ISSN
  • 0960-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-0428
OpenAlex
W2886718561
Cited by
1,032
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 144 · 2021: 196 · 2020: 219 · 2019: 125 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
142.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
Keywords
bariatric surgery, metabolic surgery
MeSH terms
Obesity Management, Humans, Metabolic Diseases, Obesity, Morbid, Surveys and Questionnaires, Societies, Medical, Bariatric Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review