The Effect of Deep Breathing Exercise and 4–7-8 Breathing Techniques Applied to Patients After Bariatric Surgery on Anxiety and Quality of Life
Abstract
Background This study aims to determine the effects of the deep breathing exercise and the 4-7-8 breathing technique applied to patients after bariatric surgery on their anxiety and quality of life. Methods The research was carried out using the pre-test post-test randomized controlled experimental research design with a control group. A total of 90 patients (30 patients in the deep breathing group, 30 patients in the 4-7-8 breathing group, and 30 patients in the control group) who met the research inclusion criteria were included in the study. While routine care was applied to the control group, 1 group was given deep breathing training, and the other group was given 4-7-8 breathing training. Personal Information Form, the Obesity-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, Status, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory were used for data collection. Results There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of descriptive characteristics (p > 0.05). It was found that the post-test State Anxiety levels of the 4-7-8 breathing group were lower than the mean scores of the deep breathing group and the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p Conclusion The 4-7-8 breathing technique was found to be beneficial in reducing the anxiety level of patients in clinical practice after bariatric surgery. It was found that deep breathing exercise was also effective in improving the quality of life. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05492…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing literature confirms widespread benefits of slow breathing practices for stress/anxiety reduction, but null or negative results are reported in some studies.
“Although existing literature confirms the widespread benefits of slow breathing practices for stress/anxiety reduction [23,24,25,35,36,37,38], null or negative results are reported in some studies [39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50].”
Of the four effective interventions lacking human-guided training, three included multiple sessions [39,80,106], and the other [79] may have incorporated unreported and unintentional human guidance due to investigator presence.
“Of the four effective interventions that lacked such training, three included multiple sessions [39,80,106], and the other [79] may have incorporated some unreported and unintentional human guidance due to the investigator’s presence during the practice.”
Stress reduction may have been hindered by fast-only breathing in Watson et al. and by discomfort of deep diaphragmatic breathing after abdominal surgery in Aktas et al.
“Regarding the latter, stress reduction may have also been hindered by fast-only breathing in Watson and colleague’s intervention and by the discomfort of doing deep diaphragmatic breathing after abdominal surgery in Aktas and colleagues’ intervention [39,105].”
The presence of core components in the three effective <5 min interventions suggests that short sessions may be particularly sensitive to practice implementation, requiring human guidance, multiple sessions, or long-term practice for effective stress reduction.
“The presence of core components in the three effective interventions [39,105,106] suggests that such short sessions may be particularly sensitive to practice implementation, such that human guidance, multiple sessions, or long-term practice are required for effective stress reduction.”
Significant associations between effectiveness, intervention duration, and number of sessions suggest that breathing practices are more beneficial when performed repeatedly.
“Three of the four effective unguided interventions included multiple sessions [39,80,106]; and significant associations between effectiveness, intervention duration, and number of sessions suggest that breathing practices are more beneficial when performed repeatedly.”
Three ineffective interventions with at-home practice [39,50] reported either inconsistent or unknown practice compliance.
“Nonetheless, interventions incorporating at-home practices should motivate and assess practice compliance, as our three ineffective interventions with at-home practice [39,50] reported either inconsistent or unknown practice compliance.”
Three of four effective unguided interventions included multiple sessions [39,80,106].
“Three of the four effective unguided interventions included multiple sessions [39,80,106]; and significant associations between effectiveness, intervention duration, and number of sessions suggest that breathing practices are more beneficial when performed repeatedly.”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 38 · Cited by 29
- Authors
- Aktaş, G. K., & İlgin, V. E.
- Affiliations
- Atatürk University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- İlgin, Vesile Eskici
- ORCID
- İlgin, Vesile Eskici
- Venue
- Obesity Surgery
- Published
- 2022-12-08
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 920-929
- ISSN
- 0960-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1708-0428
- OpenAlex
- W4310937722
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 3.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Obesity Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
- Keywords
- deep breathing exercises
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety, Breathing Exercises, Humans, Obesity, Morbid, Quality of Life, Bariatric Surgery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review