Cited by 13Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesMinimally Invasive Surgical TechniquesBody Contouring and Surgery

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spanish Experience with Latero-Lateral Duodeno-Ileostomy + Sleeve Gastrectomy with Magnet Anastomosis System

Abstract

Background The partial diversion of intestinal contents facilitates achieving and maintaining weight loss and improving glycemic control in patients with obesity and with or without T2DM. The purpose of this study is to report our experience and 1-year follow-up with novel modification of SADI-S. Methods This study is a part of a multicentric trial of patients that underwent primary side-to-side duodeno-ileostomy and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with GT metabolic solutions magnetic anastomosis system. Feasibility, safety, and initial efficacy were evaluated. Results The mean age of the patients included was 48 ± 8.75 years and the preoperative BMI was 43.32 ± 2.82 kg/m 2. The complications were present in 30% of patients. The anastomosis patency was confirmed by the passage of radiological contrast under fluoroscopy at a mean of 17 days (17-29 days), and the mean expulsion time was 42 days (32-62). The mean diameter of the anastomosis after the magnet expulsion was 13.8 × 11.4 mm. The percentage of total weight lost at 1 year was 38.68 ± 8.48% (p < 0.001). The percentage of excess weight loss 82.5 ± 18.44% (p < 0.001) and improvements in glucose profiles were observed. Mean baseline HbA1c 5.77 ± 0.31% was reduced to 5.31 ± 0.26% (p < 0.024). Conclusions Latero-lateral duodeno-ileostomy + SG with magnetic duodenal bipartition is afeasible and reasonably safe technique and induces weight loss in patients with obesity and improvement of glycemic control. This modification could be considered as an option to standard SADI-S or as a first step in two stages procedure. However, larger studies are needed. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: #NCT05322122.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11695-024-07432-w

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Rubino F, Nathan DM, Eckel RH, et al. Metabolic Surgery in the Treatment Algorithm for Type 2 Diabetes: a Joint Statement by International Diabetes Organizations. Obes Surg. 2017;27(1):2–21. · DOI
  2. Schirra J, Göke B. The physiological role of GLP-1 in human: incretin, ileal brake or more? Regul Pept. 2005;128:109–15. · DOI
  3. Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Cabrerizo L, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) for obese diabetic patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(5):1092–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2015.01.024. · DOI
  4. Pereira SS, Guimarães M, Almeida R, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) and single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) result in distinct post-prandial hormone profiles. Int J Obes (Lond). 2019;43(12):2518–27. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-018-0282-z. · DOI
  5. Ryou M, Agoston AT, Thompson CC. Endoscopic intestinal bypass creation by using self-assembling magnets in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(4):821–5. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Schlottmann F, Ryou M, Lautz D, et al. Sutureless duodeno-ileal anastomosis with self-assembling magnets: safety and feasibility of a novel metabolic procedure. Obes Surg. 2021;31(9):4195–202. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Gagner M, Krinke T, Lapointe-Gagner M, et al. Side-to-side duodeno-ileal magnetic compression anastomosis: design and feasibility of a novel device in a porcine model. Surg Endosc. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10105-x. · DOI
  8. Gagner M, Cadiere GB, Sanchez-Pernaute A, et al. Side-to-side magnet anastomosis system duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy: early multi-center results. Surg Endosc. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10134-6. · DOI
  9. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–96. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Sánchez-Pernaute A, Herrera MÁR, Ferré NP, et al. Long-term results of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). Obes Surg. 2022;32(3):682–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05879-9. · DOI
  11. Verhoeff K, Mocanu V, Zalasky A, et al. Evaluation of metabolic outcomes following SADI-S: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2022;32(4):1049–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05824-w. · DOI
  12. Jamshidi R, Stephenson JT, Clay JG, et al. Harrison MR Magnamosis: magnetic compression anastomosis with comparison to suture and staple techniques. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44(1):222–8. · DOI
  13. Ryou M, Aihara H, Thompson CC. Minimally invasive entero-enteral dual-path bypass using self-assembling magnets. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(10):4533–8. · DOI
  14. Gagner M. Safety and efficacy of a side-to-side duodeno-ileal anastomosis for weight loss and type-2 diabetes: duodenal bipartition, a novel metabolic surgery procedure. Ann Surg Innov Res. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13022-015-0015-0. · DOI
  15. Gagner M, Abuladze D, Koiava L, et al. First-in-human side-to-side magnetic compression duodeno-ileostomy with the magnet anastomosis system. Obes Surg. 2023;33(8):2282–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06708-x. · DOI
  16. Santoro S, Castro LC, Velhote MC, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition: a potent intervention for metabolic syndrome and obesity. Ann Surg. 2012;256(1):104–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825370c0. · DOI
  17. Cadière GB, Poras M, Maréchal MT, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy with duodenoileal bipartition using linear magnets: feasibility and safety at 1-year follow-up. J Gastrointest Surg. 2024;28(5):640–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2024.02.001. · DOI
  18. Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio-Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre ME, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ideal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). One to three-year follow up. Obes Surg. 2010;20:1720–6. · DOI
  19. Uhe I, Douissard J, Podetta M, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, or one-anastomosis gastric bypass? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Obesity. 2022;30(3):614–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.23338. · DOI
  20. Balamurugan G, Leo SJ, Sivagnanam ST, et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety between Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) vs one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) vs single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S): a systematic review of bariatric and metabolic surgery. Obes Surg. 2023;33(7):2194–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06602-6. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dziakova, J., Torres, A., Odovic, M., Esteban, J. M., Vázquez-Romero, M., Castillo, A., Sánchez-Pernaute, A., & Gagner, M.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
  • Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES)
  • Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (CA)
Venue
Obesity Surgery
Published
2024-08-02
Volume
34
Issue
9
Pages
3569-3575
ISSN
  • 0960-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-0428
OpenAlex
W4401250605
Cited by
13
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1
FWCI
5.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
GT Metabolic Solutions
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
Keywords
sleeve gastrectomy
MeSH terms
Adult, Anastomosis, Surgical, Duodenum, Feasibility Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gastrectomy, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Spain, Weight Loss, Treatment Outcome, Magnets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review