The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heavy metal-induced oxidative damage, defense reactions, and detoxification mechanisms in plants
Open accessAbstract
Heavy metal (HMs) contamination is widespread globally due to anthropogenic, technogenic, and geogenic activities. The HMs exposure could lead to multiple toxic effects in plants by inducing reactive oxygen species (ROS), which inhibit most cellular processes at various levels of metabolism. ROS being highly unstable could play dual role (1) damaging cellular components and (2) act as an important secondary messenger for inducing plant defense system. Cells are equipped with enzymatic and non-enzymatic defense mechanisms to counteract this damage. Some are constitutive and others that are activated only when a stress-specific signal is perceived. Enzymatic scavengers of ROS include superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione reductase, and peroxidase, while non-enzymatic antioxidants are glutathione, ascorbic acid, α-tocopherol, flavonoids, anthocyanins, carotenoids, and organic acids. The intracellular and extracellular chelation mechanisms of HMs are associated with organic acids such as citric, malic and oxalic acid, etc. The important mechanism of detoxification includes metal complexation with glutathione, amino acids, synthesis of phytochelatins and sequestration into the vacuoles. Excessive stresses induce a cascade, MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) pathway and synthesis of metal-detoxifying ligands. Metal detoxification through MAPK cascade and synthesis of metal-detoxifying ligands will be of considerable interest in the field of plant biotechnology. Further, the photoprotective roles of pigments of xanthophylls cycle under HMs stress were also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emerging MAP kinase pathways in plant stress signalling
Nakagami, H., Pitzschke, A., & Hirt, H. (2005) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2005.05.009 · Cited by 676
Cited by
Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants
Calvo, P., Nelson, L., & Kloepper, J. W. (2014) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8 · Cited by 2,294
Heavy Metal Stress and Some Mechanisms of Plant Defense Response
Emamverdian, A., Ding, Y., Mokhberdoran, F., & Xie, Y. (2015) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2015/756120 · Cited by 917
Colla, G., Hoagland, L., Ruzzi, M., Cardarelli, M., Bonini, P., Canaguier, R., & Rouphael, Y. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.02202 · Cited by 578
Alleviation of Heavy Metal Stress in Plants and Remediation of Soil by Rhizosphere Microorganisms
Mishra, J., Singh, R., & Arora, N. K. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01706 · Cited by 573
Phytohormone Priming: Regulator for Heavy Metal Stress in Plants
Sytar, O., Kumari, P., Yadav, S., Brestic, M., & Rastogi, A. (2019) · Journal of Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/s00344-018-9886-8 · Cited by 459
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sytar, O., Kumar, A., Latowski, D., Kuczynska, P., Strzałka, K., & Prasad, M. N. V.
- Venue
- Acta Physiologiae Plantarum
- Published
- 2012-12-13
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 985-999
- ISSN
- 0137-5881 (ISSN-L)
- 1861-1664
- OpenAlex
- W1979076111
- Cited by
- 581
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heavy metal-induced oxidative damage, defense reactions, and detoxification mechanisms in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11738-012-1169-6
- The paper
- Sytar, O., Kumar, A., Latowski, D., Kuczynska, P., Strzałka, K., & Prasad, M. N. V. (2013). Heavy metal-induced oxidative damage, defense reactions, and detoxification mechanisms in plants. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-012-1169-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.